|
Post by potterfox1011 on Sept 29, 2018 20:53:16 GMT
difference is allen gets picked no matter how shit be plays.bojan seems to have to prove himself with the odd minutes he vets on the pitch.hardly litely to build anyones confidence.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 29, 2018 20:54:43 GMT
I've no agenda against any player so I've no idea what you're on about there. Allen played OK, not well. He missed an open goal from 6 yards. Bojan was on the pitch for a lot less time and scored a great goal that rescued a point for our sorry asses. Like I say, it's a ridiculous comparison. Is that how we judge players yeah? Suppose if Allen had been wank for 80 minutes and scored his goal then you’d say he had a blinder. And if Bojan had come on looking like Messi but fluffed his chance you’d want him nowhere near the team? How short sighted are people on this forum that judgements on players are made entirely on the back of their goals and assists record. Not to mention one is a forward and the other a midfielder.Thanks for confirming what a ridiculous comparison you made. Bojan came on for an ineffective player on the day and rescued a point for us.
|
|
wokka59
Academy Starlet
Posts: 168
Member is Online
|
Post by wokka59 on Sept 29, 2018 20:56:58 GMT
i dunna waste words
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Sept 29, 2018 20:59:13 GMT
The goal from Bojan will blind a lot of people, and there are enough foolish enough to fall for it. I thought he was average goal aside, which was a superb finish. Too much time in ridiculous positions, slow on the ball, weak on the ball and gifted a lot of possession away in key areas. The one player in midfield that was rank average was Etebo. What did you expect? Not long after he came on we decided to bring crouch on and lump it meaning bojan was simply ignored. I thought he did pretty well with what bit of the ball he saw. Edit...and How the fuck did Allen miss that chance?
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 29, 2018 21:01:05 GMT
Bojan did more in 25 mins than Allens 2 good passes to Afobe in 80 odd mins. Had more runs and a fucking goal in 1/3 of the time. But hey, Agendas and all that. Certainly no agenda from my part. I have nothing against Bojan and i think Allen has been an absolute horro show so far this season. I don't think it's an agenda to say Allen played well and because i refuse to be bound by this pathetic and polemic idea that permeates on here, that you HAVE to slag off Allen and unless you say Bojan is god then you're wrong. No one has said Bojan was shit, no one has said anything about his goal other than it being a very good finish, but as per usual Pugs has gone off on one on his initial post on here slagging off people for things that literally no one at all has said on this thread (but if he shouts it loud enough then in his mind he's right and everyone else is beneath him. Bit puerile and tedious really) Says the king of tedium.... And you're making shit up, but carry on.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2018 21:01:13 GMT
Overall Allen was good tonight. Ok he should score but he was actually decent. Bojan came on and everything he did he rushed but that’s becaise the situation we were in. However his goal was outstanding. For me Bojan starts Tuesday night with Etebo missing out. Get Bojan on the ball around berahino and afobe and let’s see fireworks.
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 29, 2018 21:04:13 GMT
Bojan did more in 25 mins than Allens 2 good passes to Afobe in 80 odd mins. Had more runs and a fucking goal in 1/3 of the time. But hey, Agendas and all that. Certainly no agenda from my part. I have nothing against Bojan and i think Allen has been an absolute horror show so far this season. I don't think it's an agenda to say Allen played well and because i refuse to be bound by this pathetic and polemic idea that permeates on here, that you HAVE to slag off Allen and unless you say Bojan is god then you're wrong. No one has said Bojan was shit, no one has said anything about his goal other than it being a very good finish, but as per usual Pugs has gone off on one on his initial post on here slagging off people for things that literally no one at all has said on this thread (but if he shouts it loud enough then in his mind he's right and everyone else is beneath him. Bit puerile and tedious really). I'd say that insisting people believe your opinion based on telling people what others have said (when they quite clearly haven't said what he claims they have anywhere at all on this thread), is far more agenda driven. Especially when all people are doing is giving 1 player credit where it's due and he somehow then manages to turn it into an Allen vs Bojan battle that never existed beforehand. People arent' slagging bojan? "he didn't do much" is pretty much that tbh not sure what you're reading into but whew. And for the record, Allen has been shit all season and has only slightly become average today, yet still will most likely keep his place. I'm not saying it's Bojans role over Allen in the slightest, I just want the most in form player who has earned the shirt i.e. Woods. Form should dictate not bias to be playing irrespective of seniority, or previous results and with that. He did it with Ryan who has been poor for Williams. Allen doesn't deserve his start, nor Etebo, Woods does and Bojan should be in contention. Is that so hard to fathom? That is the gods honest the truth. We all know Rowett doesn't operate that way because if he did, we wouldn't of had Fletcher for weeks for no reason or Allen for weeks being horseshit for no reason, half the season already!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2018 21:06:24 GMT
The goal from Bojan will blind a lot of people, and there are enough foolish enough to fall for it. I thought he was average goal aside, which was a superb finish. Too much time in ridiculous positions, slow on the ball, weak on the ball and gifted a lot of possession away in key areas. The one player in midfield that was rank average was Etebo. Bojan likely won't start performing above average until the manager shows him some faith and plays him on a regular basis, from the start every game for a stretch. But that appears beyond GR.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2018 21:08:42 GMT
The goal from Bojan will blind a lot of people, and there are enough foolish enough to fall for it. I thought he was average goal aside, which was a superb finish. Too much time in ridiculous positions, slow on the ball, weak on the ball and gifted a lot of possession away in key areas. The one player in midfield that was rank average was Etebo. What did you expect? Not long after he came on we decided to bring crouch on and lump it meaning bojan was simply ignored. I thought he did pretty well with what bit of the ball he saw. Edit...and How the fuck did Allen miss that chance? Bojan came on in the 66th minute - Crouch 82. He scored from a good cross into the box in the 85th minute, that wasn't aimed at Crouch. I'm not buying the excuses Dave.
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 29, 2018 21:08:42 GMT
The goal from Bojan will blind a lot of people, and there are enough foolish enough to fall for it. I thought he was average goal aside, which was a superb finish. Too much time in ridiculous positions, slow on the ball, weak on the ball and gifted a lot of possession away in key areas. The one player in midfield that was rank average was Etebo. Bojan likely won't start performing above average until the manager shows him some faith and plays him on a regular basis, from the start every game for a stretch. But that appears beyond GR. There is alot beyond Mr. Rowett. Form, consistency, praise, media accumen and well defensive structure. To be honest I don't see what people see in him that makes them think he's the next fucking Mourinho or Bersa.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:10:22 GMT
Certainly no agenda from my part. I have nothing against Bojan and i think Allen has been an absolute horro show so far this season. I don't think it's an agenda to say Allen played well and because i refuse to be bound by this pathetic and polemic idea that permeates on here, that you HAVE to slag off Allen and unless you say Bojan is god then you're wrong. No one has said Bojan was shit, no one has said anything about his goal other than it being a very good finish, but as per usual Pugs has gone off on one on his initial post on here slagging off people for things that literally no one at all has said on this thread (but if he shouts it loud enough then in his mind he's right and everyone else is beneath him. Bit puerile and tedious really) Says the king of tedium.... And you're making shit up, but carry on. Well thought out and reasoned response Pugs...as ever from you when someone has the sheer audacity to question your strawman arguments. You're this board's equivalent of bloody Crapslinger at times. Can't address points actually put across by people, so you pretend they said something else and argue against that instead. Then you just think that if you shout loud enough people will agree with you and if they don't (despite you rarely backing your ideas up with...well, anything other than your own sheer arrogance) then they're wrong. Bore off you arrogant tart until you're actually willing to validate what you say as otherwise mate, pretty much no one bloody listens to you anyway. You may not like to hear that as i appreciate it may damage that massive ego of yours, but it's true nonetheless. Everyone's copped onto it and it's wearing a bit thin nowadays
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 29, 2018 21:10:44 GMT
Why does praising one player have to be weighted by criticising another player?
Allen played well
Bojan came on was OK without being amazing,then showed his class when it mattered.
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Sept 29, 2018 21:15:44 GMT
Here we fucking go, yet again. There was nothing wrong with Bojan's performance, it was better than a lot of performances we've seen from others recently, and he rescued a point with hardly any time to get really involved.
But because he didn't nutmeg every Rotherham player and score a halfway-line perfect hat trick he's being criticised.
Fucking beggars belief.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:19:05 GMT
Certainly no agenda from my part. I have nothing against Bojan and i think Allen has been an absolute horror show so far this season. I don't think it's an agenda to say Allen played well and because i refuse to be bound by this pathetic and polemic idea that permeates on here, that you HAVE to slag off Allen and unless you say Bojan is god then you're wrong. No one has said Bojan was shit, no one has said anything about his goal other than it being a very good finish, but as per usual Pugs has gone off on one on his initial post on here slagging off people for things that literally no one at all has said on this thread (but if he shouts it loud enough then in his mind he's right and everyone else is beneath him. Bit puerile and tedious really). I'd say that insisting people believe your opinion based on telling people what others have said (when they quite clearly haven't said what he claims they have anywhere at all on this thread), is far more agenda driven. Especially when all people are doing is giving 1 player credit where it's due and he somehow then manages to turn it into an Allen vs Bojan battle that never existed beforehand. People arent' slagging bojan? "he didn't do much" is pretty much that tbh not sure what you're reading into but whew. And for the record, Allen has been shit all season and has only slightly become average today, yet still will most likely keep his place. I'm not saying it's Bojans role over Allen in the slightest, I just want the most in form player who has earned the shirt i.e. Woods. Form should dictate not bias to be playing irrespective of seniority, or previous results and with that. He did it with Ryan who has been poor for Williams. Allen doesn't deserve his start, nor Etebo, Woods does and Bojan should be in contention. Is that so hard to fathom? That is the gods honest the truth. We all know Rowett doesn't operate that way because if he did, we wouldn't of had Fletcher for weeks for no reason or Allen for weeks being horseshit for no reason, half the season already! Saying that a player who's barely played for a long time other than for 2 minutes here or there didn't do much isn't slagging him off, no. I don't think anyone would expect anything else. And the fact is that other than his goal, he didn't do much! That isn't slagging someone off, it's an honest assessment of a player who barely gets on the pitch so is going to be rusty for a while (hence me saying on another thread i'd sling him in and give him a bit of a run simply because we fuck all to lose and he may lose that rust). If you're that fucking precious about the little fella that you deem that to be "slagging him off" then i wonder who's got the agenda....oh that's right, it'd be the person insisting on picking players based on form rather than bias, and also somehow insisting that a player who has literally no form whatoever at all as he's barely fucking played for anyone for about 2 and a half years should be in contention. Genius mate
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:21:08 GMT
Why does praising one player have to be weighted by criticising another player? Allen played well Bojan came on was OK without being amazing,then showed his class when it mattered. Spot on mate but as usual on here, if you mention Allen's name without it being an insult,you're a cunt...if you mention Bojan's name without saying he's god and everything he shits is made of gold, you're a cunt...if you mention both on the same thread then you MUST take sides and it's one or the other. I said earlier, it's bloody pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:24:20 GMT
Here we fucking go, yet again. There was nothing wrong with Bojan's performance, it was better than a lot of performances we've seen from others recently, and he rescued a point with hardly any time to get really involved. But because he didn't nutmeg every Rotherham player and score a halfway-line perfect hat trick he's being criticised. Fucking beggars belief. Fallen into the same trap as Pugs there haven't you? Who's said Bojan was shit exactly? Oh, that's right literally NO ONE but because they haven't held him aloft praising him and then had the nerve to say someone may have been better today then somehow, mystically that equates to people saying he's wank. Bit fucking special aren't you fella?
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 29, 2018 21:25:48 GMT
People arent' slagging bojan? "he didn't do much" is pretty much that tbh not sure what you're reading into but whew. And for the record, Allen has been shit all season and has only slightly become average today, yet still will most likely keep his place. I'm not saying it's Bojans role over Allen in the slightest, I just want the most in form player who has earned the shirt i.e. Woods. Form should dictate not bias to be playing irrespective of seniority, or previous results and with that. He did it with Ryan who has been poor for Williams. Allen doesn't deserve his start, nor Etebo, Woods does and Bojan should be in contention. Is that so hard to fathom? That is the gods honest the truth. We all know Rowett doesn't operate that way because if he did, we wouldn't of had Fletcher for weeks for no reason or Allen for weeks being horseshit for no reason, half the season already! Saying that a player who's barely played for a long time other than for 2 minutes here or there didn't do much isn't slagging him off, no. I don't think anyone would expect anything else. And the fact is that other than his goal, he didn't do much! That isn't slagging someone off, it's an honest assessment of a player who barely gets on the pitch so is going to be rusty for a while (hence me saying on another thread i'd sling him in and give him a bit of a run simply because we fuck all to lose and he may lose that rust). If you're that fucking precious about the little fella that you deem that to be "slagging him off" then i wonder who's got the agenda....oh that's right, it'd be the person insisting on picking players based on form rather than bias, and also somehow insisting that a player who has literally no form whatoever at all as he's barely fucking played for anyone for about 2 and a half years should be in contention. Genius mate Bojan had more touches, runs and passes than allen in 80'min who had two good passes. Mind you in only 25 mins Bojan produced more going forward and a fucking goal. How are those facts for you irrelevant? So yea, I don't care about what you think tbh. He played for 15 mins the other day also and offered more then, to also not get a look. In today's 25mins he did more than allen in 8 weeks, so I don't care if Allen has played "longer" this season and to boot he did more than our other two midfielders on the pitch and Allen combined in 25 fucking mins! So yea, it's pretty much a factual agenda driven argument, unlike Rowett's continued biased selection, I'll give you that. We shall see if the "lil fella" gets the same treatment as Bera, or Woods who got a start after similar appearances. How's that? Fair? Or shall we see Fletcher, Adam and Allen trouncing around doing fuck all each week? Carry on.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Sept 29, 2018 21:25:53 GMT
What did you expect? Not long after he came on we decided to bring crouch on and lump it meaning bojan was simply ignored. I thought he did pretty well with what bit of the ball he saw. Edit...and How the fuck did Allen miss that chance? Bojan came on in the 66th minute - Crouch 82. He scored from a good cross into the box in the 85th minute, that wasn't aimed at Crouch. I'm not buying the excuses Dave. Up to crouch coming on he was getting himself on the ball and feeding woods, ince and Martina with ease. After that, pretty much his only touch was to score.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 29, 2018 21:29:34 GMT
Says the king of tedium.... And you're making shit up, but carry on. Well thought out and reasoned response Pugs...as ever from you when someone has the sheer audacity to question your strawman arguments. You're this board's equivalent of bloody Crapslinger at times. Can't address points actually put across by people, so you pretend they said something else and argue against that instead. Then you just think that if you shout loud enough people will agree with you and if they don't (despite you rarely backing your ideas up with...well, anything other than your own sheer arrogance) then they're wrong. Bore off you arrogant tart until you're actually willing to validate what you say as otherwise mate, pretty much no one bloody listens to you anyway. You may not like to hear that as i appreciate it may damagenl that massive ego of yours, but it's true nonetheless. Everyone's copped onto it and it's wearing a bit thin nowadays You said he contributed VERY VERY little. I have disagreed with that view by saying he scored a goal that rescued us a point, which by any stretch isn't contributing very little. It's also a stone wall fact. I've also disagreed with you about Allen's performance being good. I said he played OK nothing more. He did miss an absolute sitter, which is another stonewall fact. Whenever anyone disagrees with you out comes the 'reasoned response' line usually followed by a diatribe of abuse. As for arrogance, you've told me what I'm actually thinking and took it on yourself to be the spokesman of the board. Go get yourself a cranberry juice you melt.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:30:21 GMT
Saying that a player who's barely played for a long time other than for 2 minutes here or there didn't do much isn't slagging him off, no. I don't think anyone would expect anything else. And the fact is that other than his goal, he didn't do much! That isn't slagging someone off, it's an honest assessment of a player who barely gets on the pitch so is going to be rusty for a while (hence me saying on another thread i'd sling him in and give him a bit of a run simply because we fuck all to lose and he may lose that rust). If you're that fucking precious about the little fella that you deem that to be "slagging him off" then i wonder who's got the agenda....oh that's right, it'd be the person insisting on picking players based on form rather than bias, and also somehow insisting that a player who has literally no form whatoever at all as he's barely fucking played for anyone for about 2 and a half years should be in contention. Genius mate Bojan had more touches, runs and passes than allen in 80'min who had two good passes. Mind you in only 25 mins Bojan produced more going forward and a fucking goal. How are those facts for you irrelevant? So yea, I don't care about what you think tbh. He played for 15 mins the other day also and offered more then, to also not get a look. In today's 25mins he did more than allen in 8 weeks, so I don't care if Allen has played "longer" this season and to boot he did more than our other two midfielders on the pitch and Allen combined in 25 fucking mins! So yea, it's pretty much a factual agenda driven argument, unlike Rowett's continued biased selection, I'll give you that. We shall see if the "lil fella" gets the same treatment as Bera, or Woods who got a start after similar appearances. How's that? Fair? Or shall we see Fletcher, Adam and Allen trouncing around doing fuck all each week? Carry on. What part of "I've said on another thread i'd sling him in for a run" did you miss? You're still banging on some agenda bullshit i have despite the fact i actually said i'd play him Did you watch the game or have you just looked up some stats and think that's the be all and end all? Because as i'm sure you'll know about football, stats in general on their own mean quite little overall. If you watched it, it was very very clear that we far better and far more threatening in general in the first half than the second.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:34:39 GMT
Well thought out and reasoned response Pugs...as ever from you when someone has the sheer audacity to question your strawman arguments. You're this board's equivalent of bloody Crapslinger at times. Can't address points actually put across by people, so you pretend they said something else and argue against that instead. Then you just think that if you shout loud enough people will agree with you and if they don't (despite you rarely backing your ideas up with...well, anything other than your own sheer arrogance) then they're wrong. Bore off you arrogant tart until you're actually willing to validate what you say as otherwise mate, pretty much no one bloody listens to you anyway. You may not like to hear that as i appreciate it may damagenl that massive ego of yours, but it's true nonetheless. Everyone's copped onto it and it's wearing a bit thin nowadays You said he contributed VERY VERY little. I have disagreed with that view by saying he scored a goal that rescued us a point, which by any stretch isn't contributing very little. It's also a stone wall fact. I've also disagreed with you about Allen's performance being good. I said he played OK nothing more. He did miss an absolute sitter, which is another stonewall fact. Whenever anyone disagrees with you out comes the 'reasoned response' line usually followed by a diatribe of abuse. As for arrogance, you've told me what I'm actually thinking and took it on yourself to be the spokesman of the board. Go get yourself a cranberry juice you melt. If you're going to validate Pugs you really need to try harder than that mate...you disagreed with me saying he did "Very, very little" because he scored you say? Go back to that post and see the rest of that sentence BEFORE the "very,very little" part you've decided to pick out and quote here. Go on, in your own time And to be called out for being abusive to other posters by you of all people? Are you for fucking real mate? All ANYONE has said on here is that Bojan scored a good goal, Allen played well and overall some think he was better than Bojan today. Not as a player in general, not in every game they've ever played but just today. Is that ok with you or should we all bow down to you because you created a Bojan vs Allen battle that didn't even bloody exist before you came on and went off on one for literally no fucking reason, saying people were saying and thinking things that literally no one actually had?
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Sept 29, 2018 21:37:07 GMT
People arent' slagging bojan? "he didn't do much" is pretty much that tbh not sure what you're reading into but whew. And for the record, Allen has been shit all season and has only slightly become average today, yet still will most likely keep his place. I'm not saying it's Bojans role over Allen in the slightest, I just want the most in form player who has earned the shirt i.e. Woods. Form should dictate not bias to be playing irrespective of seniority, or previous results and with that. He did it with Ryan who has been poor for Williams. Allen doesn't deserve his start, nor Etebo, Woods does and Bojan should be in contention. Is that so hard to fathom? That is the gods honest the truth. We all know Rowett doesn't operate that way because if he did, we wouldn't of had Fletcher for weeks for no reason or Allen for weeks being horseshit for no reason, half the season already! Saying that a player who's barely played for a long time other than for 2 minutes here or there didn't do much isn't slagging him off, no. I don't think anyone would expect anything else. And the fact is that other than his goal, he didn't do much! That isn't slagging someone off, it's an honest assessment of a player who barely gets on the pitch so is going to be rusty for a while (hence me saying on another thread i'd sling him in and give him a bit of a run simply because we fuck all to lose and he may lose that rust). If you're that fucking precious about the little fella that you deem that to be "slagging him off" then i wonder who's got the agenda....oh that's right, it'd be the person insisting on picking players based on form rather than bias, and also somehow insisting that a player who has literally no form whatoever at all as he's barely fucking played for anyone for about 2 and a half years should be in contention. Genius mate "other than his goal he didn't do much". He dropped deep pulling players out of position, he drifted wide pulling players out of position and kept the ball. He didn't nutmeg every Rotherham player and go on mazy runs but popped up in an improbable position to score a goal that rescued us a point. I've said on a different thread that Bojan is judged far higher than other Stoke players.
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 29, 2018 21:37:42 GMT
Bojan had more touches, runs and passes than allen in 80'min who had two good passes. Mind you in only 25 mins Bojan produced more going forward and a fucking goal. How are those facts for you irrelevant? So yea, I don't care about what you think tbh. He played for 15 mins the other day also and offered more then, to also not get a look. In today's 25mins he did more than allen in 8 weeks, so I don't care if Allen has played "longer" this season and to boot he did more than our other two midfielders on the pitch and Allen combined in 25 fucking mins! So yea, it's pretty much a factual agenda driven argument, unlike Rowett's continued biased selection, I'll give you that. We shall see if the "lil fella" gets the same treatment as Bera, or Woods who got a start after similar appearances. How's that? Fair? Or shall we see Fletcher, Adam and Allen trouncing around doing fuck all each week? Carry on. What part of "I've said on another thread i'd sling him in for a run" did you miss? You're still banging on some agenda bullshit i have despite the fact i actually said i'd play him Did you watch the game or have you just looked up some stats and think that's the be all and end all? Because as i'm sure you'll know about football, stats in general on their own mean quite little overall. If you watched it, it was very very clear that we far better and far more threatening in general in the first half than the second. I don't give a shit what you said on another thread, what you said above is fucking unfactual and dumb. He wasn't on for 2min here or there, he got 25 mins tonight and did more FACT. The last game he was on for less and did the same. He wasn't around in the first, duh!!!!!! I wish he fucking was to do more than 2 passes in 80. BTW, what is the fucking point of saying we were more "threatening," how do you know we couldn't of been even more threatening in general with Bojan? You have and alternate dimension that you can go look in see Bojan in for Allen at the first minute? Jesus. I fucking wish we had him on we'd of scored more throughout, its very clear from watching from the first minute to the last when the team started to be more creative, direct and run into channels and if you missed that post 65 mins you didn't watch the fucking match.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2018 21:38:53 GMT
What part of "I've said on another thread i'd sling him in for a run" did you miss? You're still banging on some agenda bullshit i have despite the fact i actually said i'd play him Did you watch the game or have you just looked up some stats and think that's the be all and end all? Because as i'm sure you'll know about football, stats in general on their own mean quite little overall. If you watched it, it was very very clear that we far better and far more threatening in general in the first half than the second. I don't give a shit what you said on another thread, what you said above is fucking unfactual and dumb. He wasn't on for 2min here or there, he got 25 mins tonight and did more FACT. The last game he was on for less and did the same. He wasn't around in the first, duh!!!!!! I wish he fucking was to do more. BTW, what is the fucking point of saying we were more "threatening" how do you know we couldn't of been even more threatening in general? You have and alternate dimension you can go look in see Bojan in for Allen at the first minute? Jesus. I fucking wish we had him on we'd of scored more throughout, its very clear from watching from the first minute to the last when the team started to be more creative, direct and run into channels and if you missed that post 65 mins you didn't watch the fucking match. Streuth
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 29, 2018 21:40:52 GMT
I don't give a shit what you said on another thread, what you said above is fucking unfactual and dumb. He wasn't on for 2min here or there, he got 25 mins tonight and did more FACT. The last game he was on for less and did the same. He wasn't around in the first, duh!!!!!! I wish he fucking was to do more. BTW, what is the fucking point of saying we were more "threatening" how do you know we couldn't of been even more threatening in general? You have and alternate dimension you can go look in see Bojan in for Allen at the first minute? Jesus. I fucking wish we had him on we'd of scored more throughout, its very clear from watching from the first minute to the last when the team started to be more creative, direct and run into channels and if you missed that post 65 mins you didn't watch the fucking match. Streuth By Godfrey.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 29, 2018 21:43:24 GMT
You said he contributed VERY VERY little. I have disagreed with that view by saying he scored a goal that rescued us a point, which by any stretch isn't contributing very little. It's also a stone wall fact. I've also disagreed with you about Allen's performance being good. I said he played OK nothing more. He did miss an absolute sitter, which is another stonewall fact. Whenever anyone disagrees with you out comes the 'reasoned response' line usually followed by a diatribe of abuse. As for arrogance, you've told me what I'm actually thinking and took it on yourself to be the spokesman of the board. Go get yourself a cranberry juice you melt. If you're going to validate Pugs you really need to try harder than that mate...you disagreed with me saying he did "Very, very little" because he scored you say? Go back to that post and see the rest of that sentence BEFORE the "very,very little" part you've decided to pick out and quote here. Go on, in your own time And to be called out for being abusive to other posters by you of all people? Are you for fucking real mate? : D Where have I been abusive to anyone? I've never ever been banned and I've been on this board longer than most. With the same username. Apart from the goal he achieved and contributed very very little. Fucking tough crowd!! And factually incorrect - see Davejohnno's posts.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:43:35 GMT
What part of "I've said on another thread i'd sling him in for a run" did you miss? You're still banging on some agenda bullshit i have despite the fact i actually said i'd play him Did you watch the game or have you just looked up some stats and think that's the be all and end all? Because as i'm sure you'll know about football, stats in general on their own mean quite little overall. If you watched it, it was very very clear that we far better and far more threatening in general in the first half than the second. I don't give a shit what you said on another thread, what you said above is fucking unfactual and dumb. He wasn't on for 2min here or there, he got 25 mins tonight and did more FACT. The last game he was on for less and did the same. He wasn't around in the first, duh!!!!!! I wish he fucking was to do more. BTW, what is the fucking point of saying we were more "threatening" how do you know we couldn't of been even more threatening in general? You have and alternate dimension you can go look in see Bojan in for Allen at the first minute? Jesus. I fucking wish we had him on we'd of scored more throughout, its very clear from watching from the first minute to the last when the team started to be more creative, direct and run into channels and if you missed that post 65 mins you didn't watch the fucking match. Most of that isn't even English and i'm going to take a guess (which it'll have to be) by what you said that i was right, in that you didn't see it and just googled some stats. We were far better in the first half than we were even after he came on. I think you're literally the only person on here that has said otherwise. Now go back to whatever you're currently pissed up on and chill the fuck out. People ARE allowed different opinions to yours (and most tend to base theirs on things other than just stats, as the vast majority of people realise they mean fuck all on their own) P.S. i personally loved the bit where you say you based all your opinions on FACT...then go on to say how we'd definitely how we'd have scored more if he'd played throughout. That a fact too Mystic Meg?
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Sept 29, 2018 21:46:35 GMT
If you're going to validate Pugs you really need to try harder than that mate...you disagreed with me saying he did "Very, very little" because he scored you say? Go back to that post and see the rest of that sentence BEFORE the "very,very little" part you've decided to pick out and quote here. Go on, in your own time And to be called out for being abusive to other posters by you of all people? Are you for fucking real mate? : D Where have I been abusive to anyone? I've never ever been banned and I've been on this board longer than most. With the same username. Apart from the goal he achieved and contributed very very little. Fucking tough crowd!! And factually incorrect - see Davejohnno's posts. So you didn't disagree with my point by pointing out he'd scored then, as i'd actually acknowledged that, specified that and said it was a good goal? Yep, nice one.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2018 21:46:38 GMT
So are you going to expand a bit on this post that you made this evening?
Already hearing shit is in motion from the club, hopefully Coatesy has had enough.
Or did you just make it up?
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 29, 2018 21:48:02 GMT
Where have I been abusive to anyone? I've never ever been banned and I've been on this board longer than most. With the same username. Apart from the goal he achieved and contributed very very little. Fucking tough crowd!! And factually incorrect - see Davejohnno's posts. So you didn't disagree with my point by pointing out he'd scored then, as i'd actually acknowledged that, specified that and said it was a good goal? Yep, nice one. You're an absolute fucking mentalist.
|
|