|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Apr 17, 2018 12:26:40 GMT
Sorry this is so late, couldn't get online last night.
I just don't have the words so I'll leave a number.
9* one more time
add * if you were there please
|
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Apr 17, 2018 12:27:23 GMT
4.
|
|
|
|
Post by magliarosa on Apr 17, 2018 12:28:47 GMT
5.
Must win game but he made poor subs and we just seemed lethargic throughout and he keeps picking Diouf who was atrocious once again.
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Apr 17, 2018 12:34:04 GMT
8
Good starting line up.
Went at it from the off with first 3 shots on target albeit easily saved by Hart.
Lots of energy too.
After half time though it started to go wrong with the Cameron substitution.
Bringing Cameron on almost cost us the game and him a red card.
He was poor and it unsettled the balance and energy in the side.
He redeemed himself with crouch and the cameo appearance by Ireland was neither here nor there.
What it did show time and time again was how badly we need a finisher. We created plenty of chances but don't have anyone to bury them and that's not Lamberts fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 17, 2018 13:13:33 GMT
7.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 13:18:07 GMT
7.
Good starting line up.
Good start to the game with excellent tempo.
Good away performance for an hour before nerves kicked in.
Very sensible to remove his two wide men after two tough recent games v Arsenal and Tottenham, saving vital energy for the home game on Sunday. Good squad management.
|
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Apr 17, 2018 13:19:57 GMT
ermmmmm its a 7 from me, worked out below.
starting with 10
+ 1 1 good sub = 11
-2 bringing on cameron and ireland = 9
-2 for bringing off bauer and diouf = 7
|
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Apr 17, 2018 13:20:46 GMT
7.
We just cant hold on to a lead for more than 10 mins.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Apr 17, 2018 13:57:28 GMT
6
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Apr 17, 2018 13:57:46 GMT
6
|
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Apr 17, 2018 14:02:09 GMT
Trying his best with inexcusably poor striker resources at his disposal. That said, his use of subs after we scored, and the all to familiar tactic of sitting back and inviting pressure bit us on the arse once again.
8 before we scored
4 after we scored
6 in total
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 14:26:29 GMT
4.
Got lucky with our goal.
PLAY. 2. UP. TOP.
long balls up to shaqiri - failure to adapt to them doubling up on our wingers.
Flooded in midfeild.
No outlet.
a generous 4...
|
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Apr 17, 2018 14:45:33 GMT
4. Got lucky with our goal. PLAY. 2. UP. TOP. long balls up to shaqiri - failure to adapt to them doubling up on our wingers. Flooded in midfeild. No outlet. a generous 4... Agree with the written text but not the number.... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 14:54:58 GMT
8
Whatever i didn't agree with (mostly Bauer going off), his gameplan was minutes away from working and we were unlucky not to win in the end.
Can't win when we play well and can't win when we don't. Hallmark of relegation, but Lambert doesn't take the blame for this IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 14:55:32 GMT
4. Got lucky with our goal. PLAY. 2. UP. TOP. long balls up to shaqiri - failure to adapt to them doubling up on our wingers. Flooded in midfeild. No outlet. a generous 4... Playing 2 up top means being even more flooded in midfield... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 14:57:46 GMT
Went to pinch a win a nearly did it.
Strange subs in Cameron and Ireland
A genuine 50/50 match so 5
|
|
|
|
Post by pez75 on Apr 17, 2018 14:57:49 GMT
3. How many times has he tried the 'keep it tight and nick one' approach and failed now? Bringing Cameron on was a new low. Another 'must win' game passes by - Championship, here we come...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 14:58:07 GMT
4. Got lucky with our goal. PLAY. 2. UP. TOP. long balls up to shaqiri - failure to adapt to them doubling up on our wingers. Flooded in midfeild. No outlet. a generous 4... Playing 2 up top means being even more flooded in midfield... Yeah, I get that, I've heard the argument for a few months. 1. It happens anyway and we lose/draw. 2.Without 2 up top your striker is going to be isolated and the widemen dont put crosses in SO 3. If you play 2 up top, it actually fits the 'lump it up system' |
|
|
|
Post by ColonelMustard on Apr 17, 2018 15:02:42 GMT
8*
Team is about the best it coukd be and didn't do much wrong.
We were lucky to be leading.
Unlucky not to win.
Diouf is no longer a footballer.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Apr 17, 2018 15:16:13 GMT
7 - In normal circumstances wasn't a bad result. But all this must win stuff is impossible when you don't have any strikers.
|
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on Apr 17, 2018 15:19:06 GMT
4.
Must win game and we had 3 holding midfielders and one winger on the pitch.
Instead of telling the lads to play it out as calmly as possible from the back with a lead or at least pop it in the channels, it instead looked like we resorted to punting it hopefully and got what we deserved as we failed to defend yet another ball coming into the box. I think his approach was fine for the first half but in the second we really needed to be the ones controlling the game. Finally to lose a 6th point from a winning position in 11 games is testament to his lack of game management skills.
We are where we deserve to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Apr 17, 2018 15:22:59 GMT
0.
He will keep getting 0 until we win a game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 15:29:06 GMT
Playing 2 up top means being even more flooded in midfield... Yeah, I get that, I've heard the argument for a few months. 1. It happens anyway and we lose/draw. 2.Without 2 up top your striker is going to be isolated and the widemen dont put crosses in SO 3. If you play 2 up top, it actually fits the 'lump it up system' With 2 up top, one of your strikers needs to be creative. Either that, or your two wingers need to be chalk-on-boots crossers. None of our strikers or wingers are those things. The best we can do is stick as many creative players on the pitch behind Diouf as possible. Shaq Ireland Choupo Diouf Is probably the best we have. Maybe Bauer for Choupo but i don't know what he's like on the left. |
|
|
|
Post by chayzenbacon on Apr 17, 2018 15:57:36 GMT
0. It was a must win game and he went with a plan not to lose it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Apr 17, 2018 16:02:11 GMT
7
Should have started with Crouch.
Bringing Cameron on for Ramadan was just bizarre.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 16:13:44 GMT
Yeah, I get that, I've heard the argument for a few months. 1. It happens anyway and we lose/draw. 2.Without 2 up top your striker is going to be isolated and the widemen dont put crosses in SO 3. If you play 2 up top, it actually fits the 'lump it up system' With 2 up top, one of your strikers needs to be creative. Either that, or your two wingers need to be chalk-on-boots crossers. None of our strikers or wingers are those things. The best we can do is stick as many creative players on the pitch behind Diouf as possible. Shaq Ireland Choupo Diouf Is probably the best we have. Maybe Bauer for Choupo but i don't know what he's like on the left. I think we disagree - I'd play crouch and diouf up top. Everything up to now hasn't worked. The best we looked was the last home game vs spurs when we had players running into the box, that's the only shred of guts i've seen from Lambert. |
|
|
|
Post by TrentValePotter96 on Apr 17, 2018 16:29:20 GMT
3
|
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Apr 17, 2018 16:37:48 GMT
For his excellent “fantasy land” post-match interview. 2
Cameron? Really? I mean really? -2
Grand total. 0
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Apr 17, 2018 16:41:17 GMT
6.5 we almost did the job but he is in danger of having almost as a middle name the way things are going .
Again he set the team out well and we did a decent job .
I don't agree with subbing Bauer and Cameron really struggled to cope with the pace of the game .
He has to depart from one up front now . None of our strikers are good enough for that role .
As much as I admire a lot of what he is doing he is in a results business and it just ain't happening, needs to in the next game at least .
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2018 16:50:22 GMT
With 2 up top, one of your strikers needs to be creative. Either that, or your two wingers need to be chalk-on-boots crossers. None of our strikers or wingers are those things. The best we can do is stick as many creative players on the pitch behind Diouf as possible. Shaq Ireland Choupo Diouf Is probably the best we have. Maybe Bauer for Choupo but i don't know what he's like on the left. I think we disagree - I'd play crouch and diouf up top. Everything up to now hasn't worked. The best we looked was the last home game vs spurs when we had players running into the box, that's the only shred of guts i've seen from Lambert. Then we hoof it to Crouch, he heads it on the halfway line, either to no-one, or to Diouf, who can't create anything. You get players like shaq as far forward as possible and surround the striker (Diouf) with what little creativity we have. That's our only option. |
|
