|
|
Post by FrankButcher on Dec 31, 2017 1:06:26 GMT
I was reading an article on Swansea earlier regarding there recent takeover with the Americans who are now in control of the club, there supporters trust owns 21% of the club. It got me thinking, Would that be a good idea for stoke to have had that?? Surely that would give the supporters a voice in the boardroom to be able to question how the clubs run etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 31, 2017 1:23:56 GMT
I was reading an article on Swansea earlier regarding there recent takeover with the Americans who are now in control of the club, there supporters trust owns 21% of the club. It got me thinking, Would that be a good idea for stoke to have had that?? Surely that would give the supporters a voice in the boardroom to be able to question how the clubs run etc. Peter says no. |
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Dec 31, 2017 1:26:25 GMT
Doesn't seem to have done Swansea much good!
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 31, 2017 1:33:11 GMT
I think all clubs should have it tbh. Even if it's 5/10%.
|
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Dec 31, 2017 1:39:49 GMT
Us lot can't run a football club. we rely on those who can, not always well but don't kid yourselves
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 31, 2017 1:42:42 GMT
Us lot can't run a football club. we rely on those who can, not always well but don't kid yourselves He hasn't mentioned running a football club? |
|
|
|
Post by macari92 on Dec 31, 2017 5:14:22 GMT
Some of the the fans want the money back because we got beat by the PL champions!!!!! Would you want then having a voice in other matters???
|
|
|
|
Post by MuddyWoody on Dec 31, 2017 8:31:26 GMT
Some of the the fans want the money back because we got beat by the PL champions!!!!! Would you want then having a voice in other matters??? Some of the fans want to see a bit of fight on the fucking pitch! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2017 8:34:42 GMT
Some of the the fans want the money back because we got beat by the PL champions!!!!! Would you want then having a voice in other matters??? Yeah because that was a one off! |
|
|
|
Post by macari92 on Dec 31, 2017 8:38:20 GMT
Some of the "fans" when they see some fight ( west brom and Huddersfield) still find reasons to pick fault at sparky and the boys so let's not kid ourselves they want to see any success!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2017 8:49:27 GMT
Some of the "fans" when they see some fight ( west brom and Huddersfield) still find reasons to pick fault at sparky and the boys so let's not kid ourselves they want to see any success!!!! If you can't see that we have massive problems, with a -23 goal difference then there is no hope. |
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Dec 31, 2017 8:54:17 GMT
I was reading an article on Swansea earlier regarding there recent takeover with the Americans who are now in control of the club, there supporters trust owns 21% of the club. It got me thinking, Would that be a good idea for stoke to have had that?? Surely that would give the supporters a voice in the boardroom to be able to question how the clubs run etc. It did not make any difference,the fans did not want the new owners and they just went over there heads.it has now come to light that the new owners have not put any money in to the club ,apparently they will only put money in club if it becomes desperate.Any transfer money will only come from sales.The sooner fans realise there is no way that someone that has put millions in to a club are going to take any notice of the fans. |
|
