|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2017 19:40:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Dec 14, 2017 19:49:40 GMT
He's paid to say this
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Dec 14, 2017 20:01:17 GMT
As I have said before on another thread - dont let a goal in after 2.5 minutes, that might give us a hope and get the crowd behind the team and dont let one in at 89 mins because that's a killer. Fuck me I'm annoyed.
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Dec 14, 2017 20:20:49 GMT
Stockholm Syndrome comes to mind. Not only that but patronising shit too
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2017 20:21:03 GMT
Less talk, better action on the pitch 😬
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Dec 14, 2017 20:21:56 GMT
We only need a message now from the bog cleaner and that’ll complete the set
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 14, 2017 20:22:18 GMT
Another fans favourites wheeled out in defence of Hughes, FFS do they think we are stupid or blind.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 14, 2017 20:26:19 GMT
Who next?
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 14, 2017 20:27:54 GMT
We only need a message now from the bog cleaner and that’ll complete the set Why would they want shut of a manager who let's them get away with doing as little as possible for their over inflated pay packets ?, Hughes is as soft as shit it's as plain as the nose on your face, he's gutless and clueless it is showing in the way the players are reacting on the pitch.
|
|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Dec 14, 2017 20:33:38 GMT
Who next? Comical Allen?
|
|
|
Post by chamberlain on Dec 14, 2017 20:33:51 GMT
Talk is cheap , get stuck in and give 100 per cent and the crowd will support the team
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Dec 14, 2017 22:05:08 GMT
I think he meant to give a different message, but reading between the lines the players are so dissappointed with the negativity that his Inner resentment came nearer to the surface than he intended? I reckon they think we're being a bunch of ungrateful bastards.
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Dec 14, 2017 22:15:20 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful.
SGS
|
|
|
Post by spiderpuss on Dec 14, 2017 22:21:53 GMT
Are players, who are asked officially ever going to say anything else. Of course not.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 14, 2017 22:26:08 GMT
I think he meant to give a different message, but reading between the lines the players are so dissappointed with the negativity that his Inner resentment came nearer to the surface than he intended? I reckon they think we're being a bunch of ungrateful bastards. And I think they are a bunch of privileged gutless tossers who are extremely fortunate to have such soft bastards signing their pay cheques every week.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 14, 2017 22:28:28 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS You bet they do , I would love a manager who expects very little from me every week to justify my wage, Kevin Wimmer we gave up at 2-0 is that acceptable ?
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Dec 14, 2017 22:33:04 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS You bet they do , I would love a manager who expects very little from me every week to justify my wage, Kevin Wimmer we gave up at 2-0 is that acceptable ? No its not. And Hughes and his players have also reiterated that it isnt acceptable. What purpose will being negative serve? SGS
|
|
|
Post by stokiemarc on Dec 14, 2017 22:33:31 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS Do you think Saido wants him in charge? There'll be a few who will be happy to see the back of him. I get the feeling Shaq is starting to lose faith with him too with his silly substitutions.
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Dec 14, 2017 22:36:59 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS Do you think Saido wants him in charge? There'll be a few who will be happy to see the back of him. I get the feeling Shaq is starting to lose faith with him too with his silly substitutions. All conjecture. Many players have publicly supported him. They don't have to. SGS
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 14, 2017 22:39:26 GMT
You bet they do , I would love a manager who expects very little from me every week to justify my wage, Kevin Wimmer we gave up at 2-0 is that acceptable ? No its not. And Hughes and his players have also reiterated that it isnt acceptable. What purpose will being negative serve? SGS So we gave up at 2-0 from our most expensive defensive signing is not negative in any way, or is it just the supporters who are not allowed to be negative ? FFS wake up the players are wheeled out after every abject surrender to tell us it is not acceptable however the evidence suggests that is complete bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2017 22:41:14 GMT
We only need a message now from the bog cleaner and that’ll complete the set Another one who talks shit no doubt ^
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Dec 14, 2017 22:42:38 GMT
FFS give us a break
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Dec 14, 2017 22:43:53 GMT
No its not. And Hughes and his players have also reiterated that it isnt acceptable. What purpose will being negative serve? SGS So we gave up at 2-0 from our most expensive defensive signing is not negative in any way, or is it just the supporters who are not allowed to be negative ? FFS wake up the players are wheeled out after every abject surrender to tell us it is not acceptable however the evidence suggests that is complete bullshit. Not said its acceptable. Of course you are allowed to be negative. I asked what purpose it will serve. Generally, negativity breeds negativity and vice versa SGS
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Dec 14, 2017 22:55:43 GMT
You bet they do , I would love a manager who expects very little from me every week to justify my wage, Kevin Wimmer we gave up at 2-0 is that acceptable ? No its not. And Hughes and his players have also reiterated that it isnt acceptable. What purpose will being negative serve? SGS Weren't you the mad lad that was signing off your old posts with getoutofmyclub or something like that! Have you gone through some sort of epiphany as you're making a lot of sense
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 14, 2017 23:54:21 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS Well training sessions are probably a breeze. If you want supporters to take the current state of affairs on the chin with barely a murmur you're following the wrong sport. Follow a county cricket team or something.
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Dec 15, 2017 12:26:23 GMT
Have you actually thought that the players want Hughes in charge. I think we will turn this around. The negativity is not helpful. SGS Well training sessions are probably a breeze. If you want supporters to take the current state of affairs on the chin with barely a murmur you're following the wrong sport. Follow a county cricket team or something. Ok thanks pal. Ill decline your offer as 28+ years of following Stoke has secured my loyalty SGS
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Dec 15, 2017 13:16:45 GMT
I think he meant to give a different message, but reading between the lines the players are so dissappointed with the negativity that his Inner resentment came nearer to the surface than he intended? I reckon they think we're being a bunch of ungrateful bastards. And I think they are a bunch of privileged gutless tossers who are extremely fortunate to have such soft bastards signing their pay cheques every week. "gutless tossers" ? if the majority of "supporters" were like you we'd be doomed. Pretty ignorant to lump them all in with a sweeping generalisation is it not ? Your motivational skills are sadly lacking, you wouldn't have an employee on your side in any situation, so I guessing you don't have to manage anything more complex in real life than passing wind.
|
|
|
Post by rondogmcmuffin on Dec 15, 2017 14:42:25 GMT
My fucking god the Sentinel online is fucking dreadful. I fucking hate the Sentinel.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 15, 2017 14:46:48 GMT
And I think they are a bunch of privileged gutless tossers who are extremely fortunate to have such soft bastards signing their pay cheques every week. "gutless tossers" ? if the majority of "supporters" were like you we'd be doomed. Pretty ignorant to lump them all in with a sweeping generalisation is it not ? Your motivational skills are sadly lacking, you wouldn't have an employee on your side in any situation, so I guessing you don't have to manage anything more complex in real life than passing wind.
|
|
|
Post by skemstokie on Dec 15, 2017 14:48:47 GMT
Maybe he feels a section of "supporters" don`t understand the meaning of SUPPORT.
|
|