|
Post by davejohnno1 on Sept 23, 2017 17:03:18 GMT
Obviously it is impossible not to be frustrated by the individual errors but if we can overlook those for a minute, I think that is by far the best we've played this season. We created chances and situations aplenty. I'm more frustrated how we've failed to score than I am about conceding 4. Was pleased to see my mate Erik turn in yet another excellent performance.
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Sept 23, 2017 17:04:45 GMT
We didn't deserve to lose 0-4 but we were a lot better against Man Utd than we were today.
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 23, 2017 17:06:52 GMT
We didn't deserve to lose 0-4 but we were a lot better against Man Utd than we were today. Why? They soaked us up and capitalized on their chances. They could've had 6.
|
|
|
Post by that's our Ric on Sept 23, 2017 17:07:39 GMT
We didn't deserve to lose 0-4 but we were a lot better against Man Utd than we were today. Absolutely Terrible defensive errors today, punished clinically admittedly Good deliveries from Shaq but didn't see a lot else
|
|
|
Post by tardelli on Sept 23, 2017 17:07:45 GMT
Absolutely agree ; for long spells we matched /bettered last year's champions. The individual errors , though and quality in their finishing for the first three goals reflects the difference in quality . I simply do not understand supposed Stoke fans ( some on Praise and Grumble ) who suggest their was no effort etc....Genuinely thought the majority of players gave 100 per cent and I have never seen Shaqiri so committed.
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Sept 23, 2017 17:09:03 GMT
We didn't deserve to lose 0-4 but we were a lot better against Man Utd than we were today. Why? They soaked us up and capitalized on their chances. They could've had 6. We were well in it until Bruno went off. It was a shambles after that, but up until then we were somehow 0-2 down in an even game.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 23, 2017 17:09:24 GMT
We passed it around nicely but we're so toothless.
Courtois won't have an easier game all season.
I can see why people think we played well but something needs to change with the front 3.
It's been obvious from the get go that Choup or Jese aren't strikers and they just keep proving it.
|
|
|
Post by stokiemarc on Sept 23, 2017 17:11:45 GMT
Absolutely agree ; for long spells we matched /bettered last year's champions. The individual errors , though and quality in their finishing for the first three goals reflects the difference in quality . I simply do not understand supposed Stoke fans ( some on Praise and Grumble ) who suggest their was no effort etc....Genuinely thought the majority of players gave 100 per cent and I have never seen Shaqiri so committed. Shaq's commitment is very pleasing to see. Even at 4-0 he was tear arsing down the wing trying to create something.
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Sept 23, 2017 17:12:09 GMT
Good as individuals but still flatter to deceive as a team. We are weak in the two areas of the park where you win and lose games.
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 23, 2017 17:12:24 GMT
Why? They soaked us up and capitalized on their chances. They could've had 6. We were well in it until Bruno went off. It was a shambles after that, but up until then we were somehow 0-2 down in an even game. I personally think they had it very easy.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:13:02 GMT
Stoke 13 Chelsea 7 shots
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Sept 23, 2017 17:16:25 GMT
There were some good performances by four or five players but when you let in four and hardly force the keeper to do anything saying we played well defeats the whole point of football which is to score goals and not concede. Massive game next Saturday as close to "must win" as we have had in a while with City away after the break
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:16:53 GMT
Obviously it is impossible not to be frustrated by the individual errors but if we can overlook those for a minute, I think that is by far the best we've played this season. We created chances and situations aplenty. I'm more frustrated how we've failed to score than I am about conceding 4. Was pleased to see my mate Erik turn in yet another excellent performance. What an absolute load of bollocks. In every sense.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:19:33 GMT
Why? They soaked us up and capitalized on their chances. They could've had 6. We were well in it until Bruno went off. It was a shambles after that, but up until then we were somehow 0-2 down in an even game. We were 2-0 down after admittedly not playing that badly but let's not kid ourselves, we never looked like scoring 2 goals to get us back into that game today. Never in a million years did we look capable of getting back into it.
|
|
|
Post by stokerstayinup on Sept 23, 2017 17:19:44 GMT
There were some good performances by four or five players but when you let in four and hardly force the keeper to do anything saying we played well defeats the whole point of football which is to score goals and not concede. Massive game next Saturday as close to "must win" as we have had in a while with City away after the break Must win my arse.
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 23, 2017 17:20:08 GMT
Chelsea 4 Stoke 0 - Goals.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 23, 2017 17:21:18 GMT
Good as individuals but still flatter to deceive as a team. We are weak in the two areas of the park where you win and lose games. Exactly this. We couldn't defend when it mattered and sure as shit couldn't attack. The bit in between was ok.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:21:54 GMT
If they can keep this up, we are in for a very good season.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:22:11 GMT
That makes us look worse than we were to be honest because Courtois never made a save all game.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 23, 2017 17:22:30 GMT
If they can keep this up, we are in for a very good season. Who's gonna score the goals?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:22:55 GMT
If they can keep this up, we are in for a very good season. Keep what up? Creating fuck all and giving the opposition 3 goals?
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Sept 23, 2017 17:23:25 GMT
There were some good performances by four or five players but when you let in four and hardly force the keeper to do anything saying we played well defeats the whole point of football which is to score goals and not concede. Massive game next Saturday as close to "must win" as we have had in a while with City away after the break Must win my arse. We will soon be bottom 3 if we don't and Hughes has little credit left with many fans this week has seen a return to Last season and.he.needs a response
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:24:11 GMT
If they can keep this up, we are in for a very good season. Keep what up? Creating fuck all and giving the opposition 3 goals? Beating Arse, Draw with the Shit, a loss to Chelsea. What were you expecting? New to SCFC are you?
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 23, 2017 17:24:21 GMT
I think we could go down if Hughes is still in charge.
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Sept 23, 2017 17:25:09 GMT
Chelsea 4 Stoke 0 - Goals. Fucking hell.agenda head.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 17:25:10 GMT
I think we could go down if Hughes is still in charge. Stop thinking, it isn't working.
|
|
|
Post by Claus_SCFC on Sept 23, 2017 17:25:48 GMT
We played very well untill Johnson gifted them the third goal.
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Sept 23, 2017 17:25:50 GMT
If they can keep this up, we are in for a very good season. Keep what up? Creating fuck all and giving the opposition 3 goals? Oh shut up you arse
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 23, 2017 17:26:00 GMT
I think we could go down if Hughes is still in charge. Stop thinking, it isn't working. It amazes me the kind of people you see on here. Are you on a wind up? I've never met a more deluded bunch of people.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 23, 2017 17:26:08 GMT
Chelsea 4 Stoke 0 - Goals. Bore off lad. Misty’s stats show that Stoke made a decent fist of it under very trying circumstances against the league champions who clearly showed their ruthlessness and class when they needed to.
|
|