|
Post by foster on Sept 24, 2019 10:26:50 GMT
PMQ's tomorrow should be fun! 🙈😁 Will it? It will be exactly how it was last time. On one side... 'Will you ask for an extension or will you break the law?' 'What progress have you made on a new deal?' On the other... 'We are in talks with our European friends but now we have less time since we're back here again' 'We want a GE, Corbyn is a chlorinated chicken'
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Sept 24, 2019 10:27:56 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project.
Can they say what law was actually broken?
|
|
|
Post by foster on Sept 24, 2019 10:29:53 GMT
This is just going to be another few weeks of stupid showmanship, stupid arguments and absolutely no progress being made. Unless something drastic is going to happen then they may as well not bother with prolonging the inevitable. And the inevitable is what? If it's just going to be a few more of bickering in the HoCs and only prolonging the period it takes for Brexit to happen, then they may as well not bother reconvening. They should have more important and better things to do. If something is done that will result in another referendum or a GE then ok. At least something happens.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 10:30:32 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project. Can they say what law was actually broken? Yes
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Sept 24, 2019 10:31:17 GMT
And the inevitable is what? If it's just going to be a few more of bickering in the HoCs and only prolonging the period it takes for Brexit to happen, then they may as well not bother reconvening. They should have more important and better things to do. If something is done that will result in another referendum or a GE then ok. At least something happens. "If something is done that will result in another referendum or a GE then ok. At least something happens" This hopefully.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 24, 2019 10:31:27 GMT
PMQ's tomorrow should be fun! 🙈😁 Will it? It will be exactly how it was last time. On one side... 'Will you ask for an extension or will you break the law?' 'What progress have you made on a new deal?' On the other... 'We are in talks with our European friends but now we have less time since we're back here again' 'We want a GE, Corbyn is a chlorinated chicken' Of course it will ... Will Johnson even be there? Will the Tories even take their seats? If they do and Johnson isn't, who will deputise for him? This is an absolute mess for the government.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Sept 24, 2019 10:36:16 GMT
Will it? It will be exactly how it was last time. On one side... 'Will you ask for an extension or will you break the law?' 'What progress have you made on a new deal?' On the other... 'We are in talks with our European friends but now we have less time since we're back here again' 'We want a GE, Corbyn is a chlorinated chicken' Of course it will ... Will Johnson even be there? Will the Tories even take their seats? If they do and Johnson isn't, who will deputise for him? This is an absolute mess for the government. The whole thing is a just a shit soap opera.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Sept 24, 2019 10:37:00 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project. Can they say what law was actually broken? Yes No.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 10:41:13 GMT
Guy Verhofstadt
At least one big relief in the Brexit saga: the rule of law in the UK is alive & kicking. Parliaments should never be silenced in a real democracy.
I never want to hear Boris Johnson or any other Brexiteer say again that the European Union is undemocratic.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Sept 24, 2019 10:41:23 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project. Can they say what law was actually broken? When you start to doubt the law, you’re on s slippery slope.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 24, 2019 10:43:53 GMT
And the inevitable is what? If it's just going to be a few more of bickering in the HoCs and only prolonging the period it takes for Brexit to happen, then they may as well not bother reconvening. They should have more important and better things to do. If something is done that will result in another referendum or a GE then ok. At least something happens. Let's see if they spend the time cracking on with delivering a deal, now they are "back at work", shall we? Calling for a second referendum would be ludicrous seeing as they have been so desperate to sit.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Sept 24, 2019 10:44:58 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project. Can they say what law was actually broken? When you start to doubt the law, you’re on s slippery slope. Name the law that was broken otherwise it appears like a political decision. The high court said no law was broken.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 24, 2019 10:45:59 GMT
This process was one big charade for the remain project. Can they say what law was actually broken? When you start to doubt the law, you’re on s slippery slope. Indeed. It wasn't 6-5, it wasn't 7-4, it was 11-0, completely and totally, unanimous. That's some conspiracy ...
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 10:47:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 24, 2019 10:49:59 GMT
When you start to doubt the law, you’re on s slippery slope. Indeed. It wasn't 6-5, it wasn't 7-4, it was 11-0, completely and totally, unanimous. That's some conspiracy ... Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Sept 24, 2019 10:50:47 GMT
When you start to doubt the law, you’re on s slippery slope. Indeed. It wasn't 6-5, it wasn't 7-4, it was 11-0, completely and totally, unanimous. That's some conspiracy ... That's as comprehensive as when Manchester United beat Australian side 'Gold Coast Academy' 11-0 in their opening game of the 2014 Milk Cup.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 24, 2019 10:52:11 GMT
Indeed. It wasn't 6-5, it wasn't 7-4, it was 11-0, completely and totally, unanimous. That's some conspiracy ... Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result. Yes I am absolutely convinced that there was no conspiracy involving the Supreme Court to block Brexit.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Sept 24, 2019 10:55:41 GMT
Read every word of that and it's clear. They were winging it.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 24, 2019 10:56:34 GMT
Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result. Yes I am absolutely convinced that there was no conspiracy involving the Supreme Court to block Brexit. So many precedents just for Brexit, though. I understand why people are questioning them. Sky are positively wanking over the decision. Utter wankers, as are the twats they are interviewing one after one, all Remainers so far.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 10:57:34 GMT
Indeed. It wasn't 6-5, it wasn't 7-4, it was 11-0, completely and totally, unanimous. That's some conspiracy ... Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result. Lets get this straight from the off it was nothing to do with brexit it was to do with parliamentary sovereignty and the right of them to hold the executive to account and the stopping of future and this pm from just ignoring your elected representatives. Another point the judiciary is independent and rules on the laws that exist in this country, to try and create a split by saying that the jocks would vote one way is despicable even for any brexiteer and go's down to closet racism!!
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 24, 2019 10:57:51 GMT
Fucking changeling Chuka getting in on the celebrations like John Terry! 😁
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Sept 24, 2019 10:58:55 GMT
The remainers are doing nothing to convince leavers we need to change
One of the big reasons for voting leave was the anti-democratic nature of the Eu
Parliment beats them hands down. Remain MPS will find out the resolve come the election
|
|
|
Post by M on Sept 24, 2019 10:59:22 GMT
What are his fighting stances now though?
A - He can get a deal negotiated and passed B - May's withdrawal agreement comes back for a vote and passes C - He literally lies dead in a ditch so he doesn't have to seek the extension he ruled out
Any others?
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 11:00:23 GMT
Brexit must now be delayed, admits Brexit Party chairman
|
|
|
Post by foster on Sept 24, 2019 11:00:43 GMT
Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result. Lets get this straight from the off it was nothing to do with brexit it was to do with parliamentary sovereignty and the right of them to hold the executive to account and the stopping of future and this pm from just ignoring your elected representatives. Another point the judiciary is independent and rules on the laws that exist in this country, to try and create a split by saying that the jocks would vote one way is despicable even for any brexiteer and go's down to closet racism!! Mate, even though the Jocks may talk weird, act strange and smell like haggis, they're actually of the same race as us.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 24, 2019 11:01:13 GMT
Did you honestly expect anything else? As soon as they said it was unanimous I knew the result, seeing that they had 2 jocks on board. Bent as fuck. 3 years of parliament taking the piss, and no lawsuit against them? Brexit was dead the day they announced the result. Lets get this straight from the off it was nothing to do with brexit it was to do with parliamentary sovereignty and the right of them to hold the executive to account and the stopping of future and this pm from just ignoring your elected representatives. Another point the judiciary is independent and rules on the laws that exist in this country, to try and create a split by saying that the jocks would vote one way is despicable even for any brexiteer and go's down to closet racism!! Fuck EU, Joey. It's been bent from day one. 3 years of undermining democracy, and when someone looks like getting something done, they go into overdrive. We have no democracy, that's been clear since the result.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 24, 2019 11:01:29 GMT
Yes I am absolutely convinced that there was no conspiracy involving the Supreme Court to block Brexit. So many precedents just for Brexit, though. I understand why people are questioning them. Sky are positively wanking over the decision. Utter wankers, as are the twats they are interviewing one after one, all Remainers so far. Apart from Farage, who said that Johnson made a ridiculous decision to prorogue parliament in the first place. And to be fair to them, it's hardly surprising that leave Tories are in hiding for the time being ...
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 24, 2019 11:02:33 GMT
Amber Rudd MP
Despite personal assurances from the PM, the Cabinet was not shown the legal advice around this prorogation.
This is an astonishing moment and I regret that the PM, who entered office with such goodwill, went down this route. I urge him to work with Parliament to pass a Deal.
|
|
|
Post by canadianmoose on Sept 24, 2019 11:03:34 GMT
Good lord....bbc just did live reaction at Hanley and the first guy must have come straight from the bushes at Clayton wood.
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on Sept 24, 2019 11:05:54 GMT
Yes I am absolutely convinced that there was no conspiracy involving the Supreme Court to block Brexit. So many precedents just for Brexit, though. I understand why people are questioning them. Sky are positively wanking over the decision. Utter wankers, as are the twats they are interviewing one after one, all Remainers so far. There are going to be precedents set though, because this is an unprecedented time. Let's say for instance in a few years another government does exactly the same as Boris has done to pass/avoid parliamentary scrutiny with a minority government that would otherwise not get through parliament. If the precedent of allowing the prorogation of parliament to bypass the house as a legislative body becomes set then there's nothing to stop governments from doing it repeatedly which is in complete disagreement with the notion in our constitutional bodies of law that Parliament is sovereign, not the executive acting alone.
|
|