|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Mar 27, 2017 22:17:01 GMT
So you believe that the Democrats were running a paedo ring out of a pizza shop, the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, and 3 million people voted illegally in the US election? The BBC is far from perfect, but it's a million times more accurate than InfoWars, Breitbart, The Canary and any other 'news' website that are completely one-sided and exist only for click bait. Infowars went too far with Pizzagate, especially as no victims ever came forward or were identified. There was definitely something dubious being covered up by the DNC though. At least 95% of Infowars content is credible. The remainder they take a punt on I think. Not sure about Sandy Hook but I'll take Alex Jones's over the BBC every time. Better still is No Agenda. So you believe the bits about Sandy Hook and 3 million illegal votes? And was 9/11 an inside job? Give me BBC over Alex Jones any time. Jones is a fucking nutcase with, I imagine, serious pyschological issues. I'd question the sanity of anyone who thinks he is talking anything close to the truth. The No Agenda podcast is certainly a step up - of the bit I've listened to I generally thought it was crap, where the two guys discussed an issue for 10 minutes and then blamed everything on Clinton with no real logic. However, they do at least live in the real world and seem to have some knowledge of politics and the reality of the world.
|
|
|
Post by yeswilko on Mar 27, 2017 22:27:21 GMT
you're scum. and thats all there is to it.
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Mar 27, 2017 23:09:17 GMT
you're scum. and thats all there is to it. Do you mean like this... ?
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Mar 27, 2017 23:17:01 GMT
Her Brother's a pretty cool guy, very knowledgeable on football. But then you find out he's a fucking huge Arsenil fan and find yourself sort of agreeing with Ramsay Bolton.
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Mar 27, 2017 23:35:23 GMT
Her Brother's a pretty cool guy, very knowledgeable on football. But then you find out he's a fucking huge Arsenil fan and find yourself sort of agreeing with Ramsay Bolton. Thanks for the opp. She's been motivational.
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Mar 27, 2017 23:41:17 GMT
I give up.....it's like play school on here at times stick your fingers back in your ears RR. Sorry to trouble you jfc It was a genuine question - I don't see what the meetings around the Good Friday Agreement have to do with a pretend journalist, Luton's version of Frank Butcher, and a crappy singer. No, not having that. You can't seriously diss Lily.
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Mar 27, 2017 23:49:13 GMT
Excellent, this means I can bring out an old favourite. Normal order is restored... If you expect proper coherent political procrastinations from a pouting pop star your head is already mush. Nice blue framed bum with an interesting upper thigh contact bruise though. Argumentative.
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 28, 2017 5:28:17 GMT
Infowars went too far with Pizzagate, especially as no victims ever came forward or were identified. There was definitely something dubious being covered up by the DNC though. At least 95% of Infowars content is credible. The remainder they take a punt on I think. Not sure about Sandy Hook but I'll take Alex Jones's over the BBC every time. Better still is No Agenda. So you believe the bits about Sandy Hook and 3 million illegal votes? And was 9/11 an inside job? Give me BBC over Alex Jones any time. Jones is a fucking nutcase with, I imagine, serious pyschological issues. I'd question the sanity of anyone who thinks he is talking anything close to the truth. The No Agenda podcast is certainly a step up - of the bit I've listened to I generally thought it was crap, where the two guys discussed an issue for 10 minutes and then blamed everything on Clinton with no real logic. However, they do at least live in the real world and seem to have some knowledge of politics and the reality of the world. Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him. I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Mar 28, 2017 6:36:54 GMT
As I said, I haven't watched all of it but I've never seen Tommy Robinson or that Watson fella ever make a good point (although the latter was good in documenting Sherlock Holmes' investigations I guess). Unless you take what they say purely at face value that is, because researching anything they speak about normally shows them up as talking complete bollocks. I'm not that familiar with what Lily Allen says or does, but I'm sure she's spoken bollocks too. I'm all in favour of hearing the other side of things, but Tommy Robinson, InfoWars and Breitbart aren't the other side of anything. They are chock full of bollocks, and have no merit whatsoever. They are a bunch of losers that have found a job in radicalising people and getting them to join their cult - they're the 'other side' of ISIS if anything. It's a shame, because they're making it even harder to have a sensible debate about immigration - this story itself is proof that they are driving the simple notion that immigration is about open border-loving liberals v closed border-loving patriotic warriors. The truth is somewhere in the middle of these two, but we won't hear it for any time soon. Rip, I sometimes wonder if George Soros pays you to write some of your posts duck. Noooo, has Roaring bit the bullet(I didn't even know he was ill)Did anyone have him in the Deadpool!?!
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Mar 28, 2017 6:42:26 GMT
So you believe the bits about Sandy Hook and 3 million illegal votes? And was 9/11 an inside job? Give me BBC over Alex Jones any time. Jones is a fucking nutcase with, I imagine, serious pyschological issues. I'd question the sanity of anyone who thinks he is talking anything close to the truth. The No Agenda podcast is certainly a step up - of the bit I've listened to I generally thought it was crap, where the two guys discussed an issue for 10 minutes and then blamed everything on Clinton with no real logic. However, they do at least live in the real world and seem to have some knowledge of politics and the reality of the world. Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him. I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious. Didn't Alex Jones make his reputation on conspiracy theories, so far from staking his reputation on it he needs more and more conspiracy theories to give him a purpose. Have you ever looked at the wafer-thin evidence he uses for some of his theories, or is it a case that you trust his 'news' so you believe most of what he says?
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 28, 2017 6:48:03 GMT
Excellent, this means I can bring out an old favourite. its a bit flabby, she doesnt do her squats
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 28, 2017 8:14:14 GMT
So you believe the bits about Sandy Hook and 3 million illegal votes? And was 9/11 an inside job? Give me BBC over Alex Jones any time. Jones is a fucking nutcase with, I imagine, serious pyschological issues. I'd question the sanity of anyone who thinks he is talking anything close to the truth. The No Agenda podcast is certainly a step up - of the bit I've listened to I generally thought it was crap, where the two guys discussed an issue for 10 minutes and then blamed everything on Clinton with no real logic. However, they do at least live in the real world and seem to have some knowledge of politics and the reality of the world. Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him.
I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious. You can't be serious surely.
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 28, 2017 8:32:06 GMT
Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him. I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious. Didn't Alex Jones make his reputation on conspiracy theories, so far from staking his reputation on it he needs more and more conspiracy theories to give him a purpose. Have you ever looked at the wafer-thin evidence he uses for some of his theories, or is it a case that you trust his 'news' so you believe most of what he says? It's No Agenda that provide the best evidence with detailed media deconstruction and corroborated sources from volunteer producers (in military, intelligence services and other industries) - Jones's theories often fall in line with these. So much of it debunks the propaganda in mainstream media. Not that the BBC et al are often called upon to offer evidence to support their stories because millions believe them implicitly, as I once did. Did you know that Ofcom give scripted content to broadcasters? When RT told them to do one, Ofcom threatened to revoke their licence. George Orwell would turn in his grave at today's mainstream media.
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on Mar 28, 2017 9:01:50 GMT
So you believe the bits about Sandy Hook and 3 million illegal votes? And was 9/11 an inside job? Give me BBC over Alex Jones any time. Jones is a fucking nutcase with, I imagine, serious pyschological issues. I'd question the sanity of anyone who thinks he is talking anything close to the truth. The No Agenda podcast is certainly a step up - of the bit I've listened to I generally thought it was crap, where the two guys discussed an issue for 10 minutes and then blamed everything on Clinton with no real logic. However, they do at least live in the real world and seem to have some knowledge of politics and the reality of the world. Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him. I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious. He made his reputation on these sorts of claims. He's got nothing to risk because he had no reputation before he started making them. He believes in chemtrails and the suppression of cancer treatments, the man is a knob.
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 28, 2017 9:10:21 GMT
Electoral fraud has been going on for a while in the US so I believe it if Infowars report it. Alex Jones staked his reputation on his Sandy Hook theory, so I believe him. I think 911 was a genuine terorist attack but the WTC7 building collapse is very dubious. He made his reputation on these sorts of claims. He's got nothing to risk because he had no reputation before he started making them. He believes in chemtrails and the suppression of cancer treatments, the man is a knob. He's orate
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Mar 28, 2017 13:11:52 GMT
I never knew Lily and Alfie were siblings.
Perhaps she could take in some Wildlings as refugees.
|
|