|
Post by AlliG on Feb 18, 2017 20:56:27 GMT
I know facts don't seem to matter anymore but the Chelsea website gives his height as 180cm, which when I was at school converted to 5ft 10 7/8 ins, so I think I will stick with their version rather than a "Donald" version. What school did you go? Kemble? 180cm is 5 ft 9 inches.. google it mate, what can't speak can't lie. Obviously a much better one than you!! The Google conversion I suspect you are using shows 180 cm equals 5.90551 feet. As I think you will find there are still 12 inches in a foot, 0.90551 of a foot is 10 7/8 inches and not 9 inches!
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Feb 19, 2017 3:39:46 GMT
I was slated for saying that last year by various forum experts. Let's not go there. Were they forum experts or merely people asking you to provide proof of what you accused Leicester of (which you couldn't)? Forum expert - someone asking you for any proof whatsoever. 2 entirely different things mate I never accused anyone of anything. The evidence of drug dopping in sports (especially cycling, baseball and athletics) is well documented (erm...Lance Armstrong, Balco). Vardy himself admitted to abusing legal stimulants: chewing tobacco (ugh!) and massive doses of caffeine (Red Bull) prior to and during the game. Google it and look up "naive" while you're at it.
|
|
|
Post by boothenboys1863 on Feb 19, 2017 5:11:48 GMT
What school did you go? Kemble? 180cm is 5 ft 9 inches.. google it mate, what can't speak can't lie. Obviously a much better one than you!! The Google conversion I suspect you are using shows 180 cm equals 5.90551 feet. As I think you will find there are still 12 inches in a foot, 0.90551 of a foot is 10 7/8 inches and not 9 inches! Fair play mate, you've done me there haha!
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 19, 2017 11:31:52 GMT
Were they forum experts or merely people asking you to provide proof of what you accused Leicester of (which you couldn't)? Forum expert - someone asking you for any proof whatsoever. 2 entirely different things mate I never accused anyone of anything. The evidence of drug dopping in sports (especially cycling, baseball and athletics) is well documented (erm...Lance Armstrong, Balco). Vardy himself admitted to abusing legal stimulants: chewing tobacco (ugh!) and massive doses of caffeine (Red Bull) prior to and during the game. Google it and look up "naive" while you're at it. Erm where did i say you accused anyone of anything in that post Mr."Everyone's always talking about me"? Google "evidence" while you're at it. What i was referring to was that metalhead (and yourself, there you go. Happy now you're being talked about?) accused them of a club wide doping programme.An accusation like that needs at least some proof..saying they admitted to using substances that you point out yourself are perfectly legal adds literally nothing whatsoever, zilch! Metalhead never provided any proof other than "they're better than they were so they must be". Your evidence consisted of "i'm an expert in drugs so i can see the signs and it looks likely". Neither of those things are evidence or proof of anything mucka. We live in a world where the onus of proof is on the accuser NOT the accused.Neither of you have any proof however of anything. I appreciate things are different in the US of A nowadays, where you can spout any old bullshit and just label those who disagree as gullible or naive but we're not all idiots who think you can conclude whatever you want from anything. Being told what to believe by you without any proof whatsoever to convince me, otherwise i'll get called naive would actually in itself be far more naive! In fact, fuck it i reckon they're all aliens with superpowers. There you go, don't believe me? Google naive, after all i have as much actual proof as you do
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Feb 19, 2017 13:03:49 GMT
Delighted! Hope the fuckers drop as well. Thought this lot where being investigated for FFP for the money they have spent to there income, or as it gone the way of QPR and been swept under the carpet.
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Feb 19, 2017 13:16:50 GMT
Delighted! Hope the fuckers drop as well. Thought this lot where being investigated for FFP for the money they have spent to there income, or as it gone the way of QPR and been swept under the carpet. That was in the football league not the prem separate rules
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 19, 2017 13:17:06 GMT
Delighted! Hope the fuckers drop as well. Thought this lot where being investigated for FFP for the money they have spent to there income, or as it gone the way of QPR and been swept under the carpet. They were fined 7.5mill last summer mate
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Feb 19, 2017 14:49:05 GMT
I never accused anyone of anything. The evidence of drug dopping in sports (especially cycling, baseball and athletics) is well documented (erm...Lance Armstrong, Balco). Vardy himself admitted to abusing legal stimulants: chewing tobacco (ugh!) and massive doses of caffeine (Red Bull) prior to and during the game. Google it and look up "naive" while you're at it. Erm where did i say you accused anyone of anything in that post Mr."Everyone's always talking about me"? Google "evidence" while you're at it. What i was referring to was that metalhead (and yourself, there you go. Happy now you're being talked about?) accused them of a club wide doping programme.An accusation like that needs at least some proof..saying they admitted to using substances that you point out yourself are perfectly legal adds literally nothing whatsoever, zilch! Metalhead never provided any proof other than "they're better than they were so they must be". Your evidence consisted of "i'm an expert in drugs so i can see the signs and it looks likely". Neither of those things are evidence or proof of anything mucka. We live in a world where the onus of proof is on the accuser NOT the accused.Neither of you have any proof however of anything. I appreciate things are different in the US of A nowadays, where you can spout any old bullshit and just label those who disagree as gullible or naive but we're not all idiots who think you can conclude whatever you want from anything. Being told what to believe by you without any proof whatsoever to convince me, otherwise i'll get called naive would actually in itself be far more naive! In fact, fuck it i reckon they're all aliens with superpowers. There you go, don't believe me? Google naive, after all i have as much actual proof as you do Impressive rant. What's your point?
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 19, 2017 17:53:56 GMT
Erm where did i say you accused anyone of anything in that post Mr."Everyone's always talking about me"? Google "evidence" while you're at it. What i was referring to was that metalhead (and yourself, there you go. Happy now you're being talked about?) accused them of a club wide doping programme.An accusation like that needs at least some proof..saying they admitted to using substances that you point out yourself are perfectly legal adds literally nothing whatsoever, zilch! Metalhead never provided any proof other than "they're better than they were so they must be". Your evidence consisted of "i'm an expert in drugs so i can see the signs and it looks likely". Neither of those things are evidence or proof of anything mucka. We live in a world where the onus of proof is on the accuser NOT the accused.Neither of you have any proof however of anything. I appreciate things are different in the US of A nowadays, where you can spout any old bullshit and just label those who disagree as gullible or naive but we're not all idiots who think you can conclude whatever you want from anything. Being told what to believe by you without any proof whatsoever to convince me, otherwise i'll get called naive would actually in itself be far more naive! In fact, fuck it i reckon they're all aliens with superpowers. There you go, don't believe me? Google naive, after all i have as much actual proof as you do Impressive rant. What's your point? That it's a bit rich for you to call people naive but thinking we somehow wouldn't be if we were to just take the opinion of a random message board warrior with no proof? Would that be more enlightened?
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Feb 19, 2017 22:06:50 GMT
Impressive rant. What's your point? That it's a bit rich for you to call people naive but thinking we somehow wouldn't be if we were to just take the opinion of a random message board warrior with no proof? Would that be more enlightened? Let's level the playing field (no pun intended) and assume neither of us have any experience in this field. Now let's decide if we are for or against cheating. Like most people I don't like cheating, but to catch a cheat you have to think like a cheat not like an honest person and look for signs you might give them away. For example not making their players' schedules available might suggests they might have something to hide. It might be a clerical error; however, we know voluntary testing doesn't work so it's necessary "to trust but verify". Here's another example: it's very suspicious when atheletes suddenly starts performing at a much higher level than they were previously. It's even more suspicious when someone notices and their performance goes back to where it was previously.
|
|