|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 10, 2017 12:56:10 GMT
Ignore Trump at your peril UK i'd say that he's the one person on the planet that it's practically impossible to ignore isn't he?
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Feb 10, 2017 22:04:03 GMT
Ignore Trump at your peril UK i'd say that he's the one person on the planet that it's practically impossible to ignore isn't he? Ooh I dunno, between them I think Tony Pulis and Benji Biscuit would give him a run for his money.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Feb 10, 2017 22:33:03 GMT
i'd say that he's the one person on the planet that it's practically impossible to ignore isn't he? Ooh I dunno, between them I think Tony Pulis and Benji Biscuit would give him a run for his money. Surely in tribute to Benji's unique WTF has he written style you should change that to “give him a rum for hid monkey"
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 12, 2017 10:17:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Feb 12, 2017 10:25:33 GMT
If Theresa May's impartiality hasn't been affected by being a Remainer, why should we worry about John Bercow's? Another Tory red herring!
|
|
|
Post by auntiegeorge on Feb 12, 2017 10:50:08 GMT
Bercow is in the news yet again and all for the wrong reasons.
The man is a charlatan and a poseur and I am getting sick and tired of him. He is disgracing parliament and all that it stand for.
RESIGN BERCOW.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2017 10:56:18 GMT
If Theresa May's impartiality hasn't been affected by being a Remainer, why should we worry about John Bercow's? Another Tory red herring! He probably has a degree but not bright enough to know when to keep his mouth shut. He must have known he would be criticised for his comments and receive a backlash from some politicians.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 12, 2017 11:08:10 GMT
If Theresa May's impartiality hasn't been affected by being a Remainer, why should we worry about John Bercow's? Another Tory red herring! May is not impartial you fool. She's the Leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister. Bercow is the Speaker of the House of Commons. His job description ........ "Politically impartial - Speakers must be politically impartial. Therefore, on election the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement. However, the Speaker will deal with their constituents' problems like a normal MP." www.parliament.ukBercow doesn't care. If there's a motion to try and oust him he'll just not call those MP's to speak again. He'll have big backing from your side who crow about parliamentary rules and regulations until someone with your own point of view breaks them. Then it's democracy.
|
|
|
Post by auntiegeorge on Feb 12, 2017 11:23:18 GMT
If Theresa May's impartiality hasn't been affected by being a Remainer, why should we worry about John Bercow's? Another Tory red herring! nick, I wish I was half as good as you in the prediction league because you have a real talent there, but your world view is rather skewed. Take away your obvious dislike of the Tories and what do you have left? Your comments are purely political and not objective. The fact is Theresa May can say and do what she wants. The Speaker of the house cannot. He is supposed to remain impartial at all times and chair debates, not be the subject of them. Remember, he has hosted parties for the North Koreans in his private suites in parliament. He welcomed the president of China. He allowed the Emir of Kuwait to address parliament. All countries with disgusting human rights records. Do you not think he is being totally hypocritical in his treatment of Trump? Not to mention the difficult position he has put the Queen in. Maybe he should have thought about that before he opened his mouth?
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Feb 12, 2017 12:08:42 GMT
If Theresa May's impartiality hasn't been affected by being a Remainer, why should we worry about John Bercow's? Another Tory red herring! nick, I wish I was half as good as you in the prediction league because you have a real talent there, but your world view is rather skewed. Take away your obvious dislike of the Tories and what do you have left? Your comments are purely political and not objective. The fact is Theresa May can say and do what she wants. The Speaker of the house cannot. He is supposed to remain impartial at all times and chair debates, not be the subject of them. Remember, he has hosted parties for the North Koreans in his private suites in parliament. He welcomed the president of China. He allowed the Emir of Kuwait to address parliament. All countries with disgusting human rights records. Do you not think he is being totally hypocritical in his treatment of Trump? Not to mention the difficult position he has put the Queen in. Maybe he should have thought about that before he opened his mouth? Being impartial as Speaker does not disqualify him from having personal views. He was allowed a vote in the Referendum just like you and me! No, I don't think he was hypocritical in his treatment of Trump. But, I tell you who was! That's Theresa May inviting him to a State visit and post Bercow comments ensuring the visit takes place when parliament isn't sitting! P.S. What makes you think I dislike Tories? I've never been accused of that before? Haha!
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 12, 2017 13:08:56 GMT
nick, I wish I was half as good as you in the prediction league because you have a real talent there, but your world view is rather skewed. Take away your obvious dislike of the Tories and what do you have left? Your comments are purely political and not objective. The fact is Theresa May can say and do what she wants. The Speaker of the house cannot. He is supposed to remain impartial at all times and chair debates, not be the subject of them. Remember, he has hosted parties for the North Koreans in his private suites in parliament. He welcomed the president of China. He allowed the Emir of Kuwait to address parliament. All countries with disgusting human rights records. Do you not think he is being totally hypocritical in his treatment of Trump? Not to mention the difficult position he has put the Queen in. Maybe he should have thought about that before he opened his mouth? Being impartial as Speaker does not disqualify him from having personal views. He was allowed a vote in the Referendum just like you and me! No, I don't think he was hypocritical in his treatment of Trump. But, I tell you who was! That's Theresa May inviting him to a State visit and post Bercow comments ensuring the visit takes place when parliament isn't sitting! P.S. What makes you think I dislike Tories? I've never been accused of that before? Haha! Being Speaker disqualifies him from disclosing his personal views "even after retirement". He can think what he likes but he can't say what he thinks. It's part of the job.
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Feb 12, 2017 13:25:01 GMT
Being impartial as Speaker does not disqualify him from having personal views. He was allowed a vote in the Referendum just like you and me! No, I don't think he was hypocritical in his treatment of Trump. But, I tell you who was! That's Theresa May inviting him to a State visit and post Bercow comments ensuring the visit takes place when parliament isn't sitting! P.S. What makes you think I dislike Tories? I've never been accused of that before? Haha! Being Speaker disqualifies him from disclosing his personal views "even after retirement". He can think what he likes but he can't say what he thinks. It's part of the job. A speaker must be: "Politically impartial Speakers must be politically impartial. Therefore, on election the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement. However, the Speaker will deal with their constituents' problems like a normal MP." This would appear to relate to party political issues not general political issues. I think 'roge' the vow of silence, you think he has undertaken, would only apply if he was elected for the constituency of Palermo South?
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 12, 2017 13:56:27 GMT
Being Speaker disqualifies him from disclosing his personal views "even after retirement". He can think what he likes but he can't say what he thinks. It's part of the job. A speaker must be: "Politically impartial Speakers must be politically impartial. Therefore, on election the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement. However, the Speaker will deal with their constituents' problems like a normal MP." This would appear to relate to party political issues not general political issues. I think 'roge' the vow of silence, you think he has undertaken, would only apply if he was elected for the constituency of Palermo South? Well done Nicholas you've just won the February 'Post Truth Alternative Facts Award'. "... the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement." Not 'general' political issues not 'party' political issues. POLITICAL issues. All of them you silly owd sod.
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Feb 12, 2017 19:59:48 GMT
A speaker must be: "Politically impartial Speakers must be politically impartial. Therefore, on election the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement. However, the Speaker will deal with their constituents' problems like a normal MP." This would appear to relate to party political issues not general political issues. I think 'roge' the vow of silence, you think he has undertaken, would only apply if he was elected for the constituency of Palermo South? Well done Nicholas you've just won the February 'Post Truth Alternative Facts Award'. "... the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement." Not 'general' political issues not 'party' political issues. POLITICAL issues. All of them you silly owd sod. According to the B.B.C. website: "A spokeswoman for the Speaker, expected to be politically neutral, said his vote against Brexit did not affect his ability to handle MPs' debates fairly." Told you this is a red herring! I assume The Speaker's spokesperson is more au fait with the rules than your good self?
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 12, 2017 23:06:27 GMT
Well done Nicholas you've just won the February 'Post Truth Alternative Facts Award'. "... the new Speaker must resign from their political party and remain separate from political issues even in retirement." Not 'general' political issues not 'party' political issues. POLITICAL issues. All of them you silly owd sod. According to the B.B.C. website: "A spokeswoman for the Speaker, expected to be politically neutral, said his vote against Brexit did not affect his ability to handle MPs' debates fairly." Told you this is a red herring! I assume The Speaker's spokesperson is more au fait with the rules than your good self? No. I quoted the official Parliament website. You've obviously accepted the straw man argument given by the spokeswoman. It's nothing to do with how he handles debates. It's not just his disclosure about which way he voted during the referendum, which is against his job description. It was his politically motivated remarks about Trump not being allowed to speak. All eagerly cheered on by the hypocritical, virtue signalling Left. Tory Red Herring my arse.
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Feb 12, 2017 23:56:31 GMT
Any saucy pictures of the wife on this thread to make it worth trawling through?
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 13, 2017 9:37:15 GMT
Ignore Trump at your peril UK i'd say that he's the one person on the planet that it's practically impossible to ignore isn't he? No, that's James Corden.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 13, 2017 9:41:23 GMT
So to summarise it's OK for the Speaker not to be impartial as long as he says something Nicko agrees with.
That's about par for the course.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 13, 2017 12:46:20 GMT
Any saucy pictures of the wife on this thread to make it worth trawling through? None.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2017 16:53:37 GMT
Nice one roger. C'mon boys. What about Sally?
|
|
|
Post by chamberlain on Feb 14, 2017 17:23:00 GMT
Any saucy pictures of the wife on this thread to make it worth trawling through? None. View AttachmentCan you imagine the little twerp satisfying her , no nor me 😀
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 14, 2017 17:54:40 GMT
Pissed in a taxi......
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 14, 2017 17:55:18 GMT
Dressed in a sheet......
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 14, 2017 17:56:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 14, 2017 17:57:51 GMT
Drinking with Rod Liddle.......
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jan 15, 2020 7:51:49 GMT
I see the little weasel creamed expenses before he left, £1000 taxi to Nottingham, numerous leaving parties, trips to Edinburgh. £21k in total.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jan 15, 2020 8:09:34 GMT
Didn't realise he was still around
A truly insignificant little man
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Jan 23, 2020 15:09:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jan 23, 2020 16:39:59 GMT
What we need is more stand up Capitalist good egg thieves like Lord Archer and Sir Philip Green.
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jan 23, 2020 16:43:36 GMT
Lord Bercow of Bullyngdon?
|
|