|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 18, 2017 9:56:21 GMT
She'll be taking the same ammount as the rest of the people named in this video. It's so easy to score brownie points on social media, but when push comes to shove... Geldof is worth $150m...?! Where's that come from I wonder... Planet 24 I'd imagine.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 20, 2017 19:20:19 GMT
No. If I wanted to reinforce my existing opinions I wouldn't come on here for a start. If Hillary can influence CNN et al so much I don't think she'd have much compunction at getting her staff, fresh from another screaming fit, to nobble a Wikipedia page or two. It might be true what you said about that Spencer guy, he could walk round in a klan outfit shouting "alt-right" like that lady who used to shout "Sentnul" up Hanley for all I care, it wouldn't make articles from what is recognised by the public before this apparent smear campaign as "alt-right" suddenly white supremacist etc. Do you think Milo Yiannopoulos is a neo-nazi for example, even if the BBC imply he's from that kind of crowd? I feel daft even asking the question it's that absurd an idea. I think any movement that's accredited as being started up by a white nationalist lays itself open to those charges. That's natural. It doesn't mean that everyone who calls themselves alt-right is a white nationalist but they choose to associate with some who probably are As for Milo, no I don't think he's a neo Nazi. I think he's a thoroughly nasty Internet troll consumed by a desperately sad self-loathing rooted in his failure to accept his own sexuality. He's full of hatred and there's only so much of it he can waste on himself. The rest seeps out and is (il)liberally lashed out in the general direction of anyone he takes a dislike to. He's happy to be used as proof absolute by some on the alt-right that they can't possibly be homophobic because one gay psychopath on Twitter agrees with them. The old "I have a friend who's Asian so I can't be racist" chestnut. Milo feels included in a movement for the first time in his life this way so it's an arrangement that suits both parties. I could be wrong but that's my cod-psychoanalysis anyway Looks like I was correct about that alt-right darling Milo being a thoroughly unpleasant individual. Any of you alt-righters still enjoying his common sense opinions?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 19:28:13 GMT
I think any movement that's accredited as being started up by a white nationalist lays itself open to those charges. That's natural. It doesn't mean that everyone who calls themselves alt-right is a white nationalist but they choose to associate with some who probably are As for Milo, no I don't think he's a neo Nazi. I think he's a thoroughly nasty Internet troll consumed by a desperately sad self-loathing rooted in his failure to accept his own sexuality. He's full of hatred and there's only so much of it he can waste on himself. The rest seeps out and is (il)liberally lashed out in the general direction of anyone he takes a dislike to. He's happy to be used as proof absolute by some on the alt-right that they can't possibly be homophobic because one gay psychopath on Twitter agrees with them. The old "I have a friend who's Asian so I can't be racist" chestnut. Milo feels included in a movement for the first time in his life this way so it's an arrangement that suits both parties. I could be wrong but that's my cod-psychoanalysis anyway Looks like I was correct about that alt-right darling Milo being a thoroughly unpleasant individual. Any of you alt-righters still enjoying his common sense opinions? Tell you what M-Dogg, it was only the other day I was saying that as a younger man, I would have bummed him daft. It was just about his only redeeming feature. Unfortunately it seems that I wouldn't have been young enough for him even then!
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Feb 20, 2017 20:08:31 GMT
I think any movement that's accredited as being started up by a white nationalist lays itself open to those charges. That's natural. It doesn't mean that everyone who calls themselves alt-right is a white nationalist but they choose to associate with some who probably are As for Milo, no I don't think he's a neo Nazi. I think he's a thoroughly nasty Internet troll consumed by a desperately sad self-loathing rooted in his failure to accept his own sexuality. He's full of hatred and there's only so much of it he can waste on himself. The rest seeps out and is (il)liberally lashed out in the general direction of anyone he takes a dislike to. He's happy to be used as proof absolute by some on the alt-right that they can't possibly be homophobic because one gay psychopath on Twitter agrees with them. The old "I have a friend who's Asian so I can't be racist" chestnut. Milo feels included in a movement for the first time in his life this way so it's an arrangement that suits both parties. I could be wrong but that's my cod-psychoanalysis anyway Looks like I was correct about that alt-right darling Milo being a thoroughly unpleasant individual. Any of you alt-righters still enjoying his common sense opinions? Yes, unless he's lost the plot. I've not followed the news over the weekend, what has he said?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 20, 2017 21:19:11 GMT
Looks like I was correct about that alt-right darling Milo being a thoroughly unpleasant individual. Any of you alt-righters still enjoying his common sense opinions? Tell you what M-Dogg, it was only the other day I was saying that as a younger man, I would have bummed him daft. It was just about his only redeeming feature. Unfortunately it seems that I wouldn't have been young enough for him even then! Jesus, deano. The last thing the poor sod needs is you unleashing the D-Dong on him
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 20, 2017 21:24:54 GMT
Looks like I was correct about that alt-right darling Milo being a thoroughly unpleasant individual. Any of you alt-righters still enjoying his common sense opinions? Yes, unless he's lost the plot. I've not followed the news over the weekend, what has he said? www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4242322/Milo-Yiannopoulos-BANNED-CPAC-conference.htmlAs I suggested, a nasty bloke who's thoroughly repressed. Presumably by the abuse he claims to have had, which isn't to excuse his behaviour
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 21:25:44 GMT
Tell you what M-Dogg, it was only the other day I was saying that as a younger man, I would have bummed him daft. It was just about his only redeeming feature. Unfortunately it seems that I wouldn't have been young enough for him even then! Jesus, deano. The last thing the poor sod needs is you unleashing the D-Dong on him My dick would be the smartest thing to ever come out of his mouth
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Feb 20, 2017 21:50:01 GMT
I don't agree with his original remarks from the video as quoted - there's not really a grey area over these things as he suggests. It doesn't change my view of his politics though and I don't find him nasty.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Mar 7, 2017 19:12:18 GMT
No-one talking about 'Vault7'?
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Mar 7, 2017 21:15:36 GMT
No-one talking about 'Vault7'? Does anybody seriously believe all this drivel in this list?
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 7, 2017 22:07:44 GMT
No-one talking about 'Vault7'? Does anybody seriously believe all this drivel in this list? Dutch, I believe a lot of it duck. It's consistent with what we knew from the Snowden revelations. For example, US authorities alledgedly pressurised Linus Torvald the founder of the Linux operating system to put in a "back door" but he refused. When asked at a conference about it Torvalds said "no" but winked and shook his head to say "yes"...
|
|
|
Post by mtrstudent on Mar 8, 2017 2:23:01 GMT
Republican healthcare plan came out today.
About 6 pages or 10% of the bill are mostly about stopping lottery winners from getting free medical care which sounds ok but it doesn't seem like it'll fix their big problems???
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Mar 8, 2017 11:42:01 GMT
Does anybody seriously believe all this drivel in this list? Dutch, I believe a lot of it duck. It's consistent with what we knew from the Snowden revelations. For example, US authorities alledgedly pressurised Linus Torvald the founder of the Linux operating system to put in a "back door" but he refused. When asked at a conference about it Torvalds said "no" but winked and shook his head to say "yes"... Maybe they're just trying to keep America safe from bad dudes.
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Mar 8, 2017 11:53:29 GMT
No-one talking about 'Vault7'? Does anybody seriously believe all this drivel in this list? Watch the movie SNOWDON. If you have it it is available on Kodi via Exodus.
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 8, 2017 12:26:13 GMT
Dutch, I believe a lot of it duck. It's consistent with what we knew from the Snowden revelations. For example, US authorities alledgedly pressurised Linus Torvald the founder of the Linux operating system to put in a "back door" but he refused. When asked at a conference about it Torvalds said "no" but winked and shook his head to say "yes"... Maybe they're just trying to keep America safe from bad dudes. Hopefully that's a genuine use of the information. Blackmail and espionage would be more sinister motives.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Mar 8, 2017 15:39:37 GMT
Maybe they're just trying to keep America safe from bad dudes. Hopefully that's a genuine use of the information. Blackmail and espionage would be more sinister motives. Well I doubt the CIA would be interested in a 50 year old fat bloke living in Amsterdam, having a wank on the sofa....
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Mar 8, 2017 15:51:20 GMT
Hopefully that's a genuine use of the information. Blackmail and espionage would be more sinister motives. Well I doubt the CIA would be interested in a 50 year old fat bloke living in Amsterdam, having a wank on the sofa.... There's not much to worry about for most people right now but where is it heading? Things that were ok in the past are now illegal, we don't know what things that are legal now will be illegal in the near future. Take for example free speech, it's being clamped down all the time. Crack a joke about a woman ten years ago & no-one cared, crack a joke about a woman now whilst you're at work & you could end up getting sacked for a hate crime. Who's to say that in ten years time you crack a joke about a woman in your own living room & ten minutes later you have the police smashing through your front door?
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Mar 8, 2017 16:02:51 GMT
Well I doubt the CIA would be interested in a 50 year old fat bloke living in Amsterdam, having a wank on the sofa.... There's not much to worry about for most people right now but where is it heading? Things that were ok in the past are now illegal, we don't know what things that are legal now will be illegal in the near future. Take for example free speech, it's being clamped down all the time. Crack a joke about a woman ten years ago & no-one cared, crack a joke about a woman now whilst you're at work & you could end up getting sacked for a hate crime. Who's to say that in ten years time you crack a joke about a woman in your own living room & ten minutes later you have the police smashing through your front door? Good points. It'll be those pesky liberals who are well known for cracking down on everything who'll do the above, not someone like Trump or the alt-right, they're all for differences of opinion, news, facts etc. They'd never ban anyone from, say, a press conference, for reporting anything which the government doesn't like! It's all the liberals fault if we turn into a police state lol I'm not sure I like Milo's free speech either if I'm honest, especially since he's been espousing the virtues of man-boy love on Breitbart.com, or Nest-of-Paedos.com as it should probably be re-named. The BBC obviously doesn't have the only paedos in the media circus! Looks like manmarking got him pretty much spot on last November.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Mar 8, 2017 16:34:12 GMT
Good points. It'll be those pesky liberals who are well known for cracking down on everything who'll do the above, not someone like Trump or the alt-right, they're all for differences of opinion, news, facts etc. They'd never ban anyone from, say, a press conference, for reporting anything which the government doesn't like! It's all the liberals fault if we turn into a police state lol I'm not sure I like Milo's free speech either if I'm honest, especially since he's been espousing the virtues of man-boy love on Breitbart.com, or Nest-of-Paedos.com as it should probably be re-named. The BBC obviously doesn't have the only paedos in the media circus! Looks like manmarking got him pretty much spot on last November. It's funny you should mention paedos, I tried to get a discussion going about this before but it got binned 'cos someone outed himself as one then tried to brush it off... Right now paedos are quite rightly viewed as scum but I've noticed it creeping its way in that paedophilia is being 'normalised'. Only the other week I was reading how some police officer (Might have been from the MET, can't remember off the top of my head) was saying how basically we should all be free to view child porn all we like, so long as we don't act out on it. No doubt people will soon be on here saying something along the lines of "Oh well it's no harm so long as they're not acting on it"... But could you imagine just a few years ago if I'd said it'll soon be perfectly ok to have images & videos of child porn all over your computer? You'd have called me a fucking mentalist, unyet in a few years time it looks like we could well be at that stage. Look at homosexuals (I'm not comparing homosexuals & paedophiles before anyone starts) but we haven't got to go back all that many years to find homosexuals being scum, sick in the head or whatever as the opinion of the majority. If I was making this post back then you'd have laughed me out the building if I'd told you it'd only be a few years away that homosexuals would be allowed to get married, adopt kids, and it'd be you getting hit with 'hate crimes' for disagreeing with it. So, in ten, twenty years time when the police come piling through your front door 'cos they'd been listening in via your tele to you saying to your wife how sick you thought paedos were. Don't say you weren't warned. (I'll no doubt have some Social Justice Warrior of the future digging this post up & calling me a paedoist 'cos of all my blatent paedoism in this post!)
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Mar 8, 2017 17:10:38 GMT
Good points. It'll be those pesky liberals who are well known for cracking down on everything who'll do the above, not someone like Trump or the alt-right, they're all for differences of opinion, news, facts etc. They'd never ban anyone from, say, a press conference, for reporting anything which the government doesn't like! It's all the liberals fault if we turn into a police state lol I'm not sure I like Milo's free speech either if I'm honest, especially since he's been espousing the virtues of man-boy love on Breitbart.com, or Nest-of-Paedos.com as it should probably be re-named. The BBC obviously doesn't have the only paedos in the media circus! Looks like manmarking got him pretty much spot on last November. It's funny you should mention paedos, I tried to get a discussion going about this before but it got binned 'cos someone outed himself as one then tried to brush it off... Right now paedos are quite rightly viewed as scum but I've noticed it creeping its way in that paedophilia is being 'normalised'. Only the other week I was reading how some police officer (Might have been from the MET, can't remember off the top of my head) was saying how basically we should all be free to view child porn all we like, so long as we don't act out on it. No doubt people will soon be on here saying something along the lines of "Oh well it's no harm so long as they're not acting on it"... But could you imagine just a few years ago if I'd said it'll soon be perfectly ok to have images & videos of child porn all over your computer? You'd have called me a fucking mentalist, unyet in a few years time it looks like we could well be at that stage. Look at homosexuals (I'm not comparing homosexuals & paedophiles before anyone starts) but we haven't got to go back all that many years to find homosexuals being scum, sick in the head or whatever as the opinion of the majority. If I was making this post back then you'd have laughed me out the building if I'd told you it'd only be a few years away that homosexuals would be allowed to get married, adopt kids, and it'd be you getting hit with 'hate crimes' for disagreeing with it. So, in ten, twenty years time when the police come piling through your front door 'cos they'd been listening in via your tele to you saying to your wife how sick you thought paedos were. Don't say you weren't warned. (I'll no doubt have some Social Justice Warrior of the future digging this post up & calling me a paedoist 'cos of all my blatent paedoism in this post!) that was a proper Oatcake "WTF" moment TDC!
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Mar 8, 2017 18:14:20 GMT
Hopefully that's a genuine use of the information. Blackmail and espionage would be more sinister motives. Well I doubt the CIA would be interested in a 50 year old fat bloke living in Amsterdam, having a wank on the sofa.... You never know...! You might have an admirer, some fit bird in the intelligence services might like what she sees. The next thing you know you she's got you spying on Wilders
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 9, 2017 11:48:39 GMT
Good points. It'll be those pesky liberals who are well known for cracking down on everything who'll do the above, not someone like Trump or the alt-right, they're all for differences of opinion, news, facts etc. They'd never ban anyone from, say, a press conference, for reporting anything which the government doesn't like! It's all the liberals fault if we turn into a police state lol I'm not sure I like Milo's free speech either if I'm honest, especially since he's been espousing the virtues of man-boy love on Breitbart.com, or Nest-of-Paedos.com as it should probably be re-named. The BBC obviously doesn't have the only paedos in the media circus! Looks like manmarking got him pretty much spot on last November. It's funny you should mention paedos, I tried to get a discussion going about this before but it got binned 'cos someone outed himself as one then tried to brush it off... Right now paedos are quite rightly viewed as scum but I've noticed it creeping its way in that paedophilia is being 'normalised'. Only the other week I was reading how some police officer (Might have been from the MET, can't remember off the top of my head) was saying how basically we should all be free to view child porn all we like, so long as we don't act out on it. No doubt people will soon be on here saying something along the lines of "Oh well it's no harm so long as they're not acting on it"... But could you imagine just a few years ago if I'd said it'll soon be perfectly ok to have images & videos of child porn all over your computer? You'd have called me a fucking mentalist, unyet in a few years time it looks like we could well be at that stage. Look at homosexuals (I'm not comparing homosexuals & paedophiles before anyone starts) but we haven't got to go back all that many years to find homosexuals being scum, sick in the head or whatever as the opinion of the majority. If I was making this post back then you'd have laughed me out the building if I'd told you it'd only be a few years away that homosexuals would be allowed to get married, adopt kids, and it'd be you getting hit with 'hate crimes' for disagreeing with it. So, in ten, twenty years time when the police come piling through your front door 'cos they'd been listening in via your tele to you saying to your wife how sick you thought paedos were. Don't say you weren't warned. (I'll no doubt have some Social Justice Warrior of the future digging this post up & calling me a paedoist 'cos of all my blatent paedoism in this post!) It's never acceptable to watch child porn under any circumstances, for a police officer to actually come out with that is absolutely mental. Peadophillia is such a strange problem for our society to deal with, are paedophile's born like that, or do they become one? It's a really complex issue and I wonder how many adults that are sexually attracted to children seek some form of help? Does the stigma surrounding peadophillia prevent many of them from seeking help? Does the help even work? This article is pretty interesting and asks the questions but doesn't provide any definitive answers. www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/01/what-should-we-do-about-paedophiles
|
|