|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 9:48:55 GMT
Wasn't the suggestion, and it was only a suggestion, that our subs could carry conventional ICBM's with non-nuclear warheads? Many people do not want these weapons of mass destruction, no matter what your personal opinion is. Conventional weapons still pack huge firepower and would maintain our RN Submarines along with all those precious skills and jobs in the UK sub industry. Unlike the Conservatives who have just stood by and allowed the British Steel industry collapse. To make out that the subs would just go sailing merrily around without any weapons onboard whatsoever just illustrates how desperate you are to discredit Jeremy Corbyn. I don't need to discredit Jeremy Corbyn he's doing a fine job of that himself. The Trident taxis names is from a Labour MP and his summation of what was being suggested, no doubt he'll be on the naughty list. How did you end up so radicalised mate? You're like a rabid dog!
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Apr 25, 2016 13:54:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 14:14:31 GMT
I don't see how old news like that is relevant. In every cabinet there are a mixture of supporters/detractors - looks at IDS. Corbyn has a mandate to reform the Labour Party and to his credit he chose his first cabinet from a mix of both Labour and New Labour MP's...something he totally was not obliged to do. What's your point?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Apr 25, 2016 15:34:28 GMT
I don't see how old news like that is relevant. In every cabinet there are a mixture of supporters/detractors - looks at IDS. Corbyn has a mandate to reform the Labour Party and to his credit he chose his first cabinet from a mix of both Labour and New Labour MP's...something he totally was not obliged to do. What's your point? My point is that you claimed I was radicalised / rabid dog for quoting facts, Jezza and his people keep a a naughty list, a bit schoolboyish whatever next passing round nuddy pictures www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/22/revealed-jeremy-corbyn-showed-off-naked-diane-abbott-to-impress/
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 15:56:12 GMT
I don't see how old news like that is relevant. In every cabinet there are a mixture of supporters/detractors - looks at IDS. Corbyn has a mandate to reform the Labour Party and to his credit he chose his first cabinet from a mix of both Labour and New Labour MP's...something he totally was not obliged to do. What's your point? My point is that you claimed I was radicalised / rabid dog for quoting facts, Jezza and his people keep a a naughty list, a bit schoolboyish whatever next passing round nuddy pictures www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/22/revealed-jeremy-corbyn-showed-off-naked-diane-abbott-to-impress/Hardly issues that would prevent you from getting a heart bypass done on the NHS or not having enough money to survive on...with respect, this is where your pals are taking us all FYD.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Apr 25, 2016 17:25:36 GMT
Hardly issues that would prevent you from getting a heart bypass done on the NHS or not having enough money to survive on...with respect, this is where your pals are taking us all FYD. Of course that's where they're going sure fire way to get re elected isn't it. We could look at the facts over the party which has privatised doctors surgeries and ownership of hospitals and left the NHS with a prohibitive PFI bill. We could also look at which party took away the 10p tax rate and which party is taking millions of party out of tax altogether (and not by the usual Labour way of making them unemployed)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 17:29:51 GMT
Hardly issues that would prevent you from getting a heart bypass done on the NHS or not having enough money to survive on...with respect, this is where your pals are taking us all FYD. Of course that's where they're going sure fire way to get re elected isn't it. We could look at the facts over the party which has privatised doctors surgeries and ownership of hospitals and left the NHS with a prohibitive PFI bill. We could also look at which party took away the 10p tax rate and which party is taking millions of party out of tax altogether (and not by the usual Labour way of making them unemployed) I like it when you argue the points. Too many times you tow a party line. I know that you are smart. I respect you.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 25, 2016 17:40:49 GMT
Hardly issues that would prevent you from getting a heart bypass done on the NHS or not having enough money to survive on...with respect, this is where your pals are taking us all FYD. Of course that's where they're going sure fire way to get re elected isn't it. We could look at the facts over the party which has privatised doctors surgeries and ownership of hospitals and left the NHS with a prohibitive PFI bill. We could also look at which party took away the 10p tax rate and which party is taking millions of party out of tax altogether (and not by the usual Labour way of making them unemployed) Which party started PFI?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Apr 25, 2016 18:00:14 GMT
Of course that's where they're going sure fire way to get re elected isn't it. We could look at the facts over the party which has privatised doctors surgeries and ownership of hospitals and left the NHS with a prohibitive PFI bill. We could also look at which party took away the 10p tax rate and which party is taking millions of party out of tax altogether (and not by the usual Labour way of making them unemployed) Which party started PFI? how utterly irrelevant as usual, PFI was intended to be used when it was recognised the private sector were better at managing certain types of projects to budget and on time. It was never intended to be used to massively overpay for major things like schools and hospitals (that we don't even own now!) just so Gordon Clown could pretend to be competent.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 25, 2016 19:21:32 GMT
how utterly irrelevant as usual, PFI was intended to be used when it was recognised the private sector were better at managing certain types of projects to budget and on time. It was never intended to be used to massively overpay for major things like schools and hospitals (that we don't even own now!) just so Gordon Clown could pretend to be competent. Oh right...so that clears all that up then...cheers. FFS...........
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Apr 25, 2016 19:31:42 GMT
how utterly irrelevant as usual, PFI was intended to be used when it was recognised the private sector were better at managing certain types of projects to budget and on time. It was never intended to be used to massively overpay for major things like schools and hospitals (that we don't even own now!) just so Gordon Clown could pretend to be competent. Oh right...so that clears all that up then...cheers. FFS........... Ok well as Labour invented the NHS it's ok to blame them for the junior doctors strike, maybe you should go back to meme's.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 20:27:01 GMT
He gives respectable left wingers a bad rep on this board. How so Humphrey? In what way do I? You always come out with these left field arguments with the least credible sources imaginable.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 26, 2016 18:30:12 GMT
How so Humphrey? In what way do I? You always come out with these left field arguments with the least credible sources imaginable. Feel free to provide examples?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 26, 2016 18:31:11 GMT
Oh right...so that clears all that up then...cheers. FFS........... Ok well as Labour invented the NHS it's ok to blame them for the junior doctors strike, maybe you should go back to meme's. Oh come on mate....you can do better than that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2016 20:31:56 GMT
You always come out with these left field arguments with the least credible sources imaginable. Feel free to provide examples? This thread being a fine example, then you've backed something else up with the Daily Mail which you always slate. It's erratic.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 28, 2016 19:36:01 GMT
Doesn't look like this one is going away.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 4, 2016 19:58:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on May 4, 2016 21:02:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 5, 2016 20:05:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 5, 2016 20:16:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on May 5, 2016 21:36:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2016 19:58:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2016 20:08:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by desman2 on May 6, 2016 22:51:46 GMT
There is no place in society for any party that opts for electoral fraud. Its becoming more and more common, as if someone somewhere is pulling the strings.
|
|
|
Post by PerCyfilth ....Captains Log on May 7, 2016 8:13:50 GMT
Makes you wonder which way the Brexit vote will end up.....
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 12, 2016 20:04:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 13, 2016 18:50:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jun 1, 2016 18:29:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jun 1, 2016 18:59:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jun 1, 2016 19:00:57 GMT
You and your Tory mates have gone ever so quiet FYD.....
|
|