|
Post by nottinghamstokie on Apr 21, 2016 15:35:57 GMT
60 next time round,so I've ruined the average as well
Amazed that the eloquent RAF ( 48 next birthday if I'm not mistaken) hasn't been on saying that "it's just a ******* ****** ******* number and who gives a ******* toss ?" :-)
|
|
|
Post by Silkystoke on Apr 21, 2016 15:38:42 GMT
When we win I'm 21, lose I'm old and depressed...!!!! For the record I'm 49
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Apr 21, 2016 15:55:03 GMT
Young and bubbly when we win but a miserable old codger when we lose. 61 for the record.
|
|
|
Post by NG4POTTERS on Apr 21, 2016 15:59:31 GMT
42. First match at 7 of so thats 35 years of SCFC. I think the first time i stepped in the victoria ground was the moment it was 'in the blood'.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 16:03:19 GMT
43 look and feel about 63.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Apr 21, 2016 16:15:25 GMT
From these responses, it would appear the average age is early 60's!
|
|
sevvy
Youth Player
Posts: 342
|
Post by sevvy on Apr 21, 2016 16:17:08 GMT
53 very soon
|
|
|
Post by stokiedan17 on Apr 21, 2016 16:24:16 GMT
I'm 21. so far I'm the youngest. Yet to see any 17 year olds as OP said.
|
|
|
Post by agingerstokie on Apr 21, 2016 16:29:14 GMT
22, 23 coming up
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Apr 21, 2016 16:40:52 GMT
I'm 17.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokie1 on Apr 21, 2016 18:42:05 GMT
59 next week and first match when I was about 7. 52 years and still riding the Stoke rolacoaster. Cmon Stoke!
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Apr 21, 2016 18:49:26 GMT
We are talking age in years and not number of haemorrhoids!!
|
|
|
Post by theincontinents on Apr 21, 2016 19:47:05 GMT
I'M 58 Hughes out Sack the board The players are all idle bastards with no passion for the club Long live the stereotype!
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Apr 21, 2016 19:50:07 GMT
We are talking age in years and not number of haemorrhoids!! I still haven't got hair on my arse never mind piles!
|
|
|
Post by dexta on Apr 21, 2016 20:02:49 GMT
I'm Spartacus
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Apr 21, 2016 20:53:44 GMT
57, 75 when we lose.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 20:55:55 GMT
I'm 21. so far I'm the youngest. Yet to see any 17 year olds as OP said. I'm 20, you old fucking fart.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 21:16:47 GMT
Im 30 something.
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Apr 21, 2016 21:23:31 GMT
I doubt there are very many regular teenage posters on here to be perfectly honest. They are having way too much fun frantically pinging digitally rendered pictures of their todgers and front-bottoms to one another on their Smartphone's over Instagram to give two hoots about listening to ChiefDelilah, BayernOatcake and SheikhMomo wittering inanely on about the ramifications of 4-4-2 versus a false 9 +1
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Apr 21, 2016 21:57:51 GMT
so you registered when you were 8?
|
|
|
Post by bigdev on Apr 21, 2016 22:09:09 GMT
38
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Apr 21, 2016 22:14:10 GMT
so you registered when you were 8? Yes of course. There is no age limit to being a stokie.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Apr 21, 2016 23:22:32 GMT
so you registered when you were 8? Yes of course. There is no age limit to being a stokie. Erm your profile says 42
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 23:32:07 GMT
60
|
|
|
Post by huuuuuth on Apr 22, 2016 6:52:04 GMT
45, but feel 75 after nearly 40 years of watching our beloved Potters
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2016 7:02:00 GMT
42. Thankfully I don't feel it (yet)...must admit that the average is higher than I thought...though I suppose there's probably good spread of Golden Oldies from the old 'Rivals' days (Christ, I remember being well titsed off when we had to move off Rivals) and for the younger/newer members, that was when we were shit. No - I mean really shit - not just-lost-at-Home-to-Spurs shit!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2016 7:04:02 GMT
Agreed (says a poster who is still just about below OS's average!) - we don't get to see everyone's age and, amazingly, some people tell porkies but from many years' experience dealing with all the moaning I'd put our main band of posters between 30 and 60, with plenty of valued posters 60 and 70+ - which is great but we could do with some new new young blood to balance it out. The average age of EE posters who behave less well than 7 year olds is 50+ for sure, fact. People like me tell "porkies" about their age on the internet - its not amazing, its a sensible security thing for sites where its not essential to have my true date of birth. if anyone steals your data and then quotes my "internet" birthday for a security check to try and get at my bank they will fail. Jackpot. Not only that - I fake my name if I'm only 'looking, not buying'. Pain in the arse once you decide that you like what you see though
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Apr 22, 2016 8:20:14 GMT
Yes of course. There is no age limit to being a stokie. Erm your profile says 42 I made an age up when I registered.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Apr 22, 2016 8:39:10 GMT
Older than some, younger than others, I'd say i'm average age But northy, 81 is NOT around 45 Ooh, you are awful, but I like you
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2016 9:38:18 GMT
I made an age up when I registered. Same ere...I made up my age... I was 51 earlier this week. Incidentally...WTF is an Oakecake....
|
|