|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 30, 2016 13:27:54 GMT
a terrible attack on one combatant involved in a war by another combatant involved in the same war that resulted in just over 2,000 deaths (almost solely military personnel). one that most certainly did not justify killing nearly 200,000 men, women and children in one fell swoop..almost all innocent civilians You've summed up my thoughts nicely mick. Obviously better than you could manage well done mick, what Hiroshima has to do with a suicide bomber in Pakistan I am not sure, seems to be a deflection tactic by one of the usual suspects then backed up by **************'s
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 30, 2016 13:43:38 GMT
Obviously better than you could manage well done mick, what Hiroshima has to do with a suicide bomber in Pakistan I am not sure, seems to be a deflection tactic by one of the usual suspects then backed up by **************'s Are you for real? You raised the failure of appeasement in history to back up the assertion 'we can nuke the fucking lot of em' raised by Shanghai. If you can't see the link between a nuclear weapon dropped on innocent people (Hiroshima) and a nuclear weapon that you and Shangai would seemingly like to drop on 'the lot of them' (which would include innocent people) then I seriously question your reasoning skills and intelligence. Also how you can bring up appeasement to back up your point, but then criticise me for referencing Hiroshima is beyond me.
|
|