|
Post by potterspele on Feb 11, 2016 12:50:47 GMT
A big game of Wembley doubles with the ref as the keeper.
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Feb 11, 2016 13:20:10 GMT
A big game of Wembley doubles with the ref as the keeper. No poaching in the 6 yard box. Can headers be scored off anyone's cross or your partners only? On heads and volleys - how many lives?
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Feb 11, 2016 13:45:48 GMT
Managers have a drink up. First one go for a piss loses.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 11, 2016 13:48:02 GMT
My suggestion is that if the result is level at 90mins the team with the most shots on target during the game goes through, it really could be that simple. I think this would encourage more attacking football and in turn produce more goals therefore hopefully in turn meaning that a match is won fair and square during the alloted 90mins match. It could be tweaked and adapted to perhaps be the deciding factor after extra time as opposed to the 90mins to just eliminate the penalty option. I'm convinced this idea would create more goals and could make extra time and penalties a thing of the past. The penalty option could still be utilised should the rare occasion occur where the score is level as is shots on target but think it would be very unlikely. Whether the shots on target stats are displayed/conveyed to teams during the game so they know where they stand could be debated to.
Yeah something along these lines I think but it would probably have to be confined to the 30 minutes of extra time.
Although I appreciate it sometimes hard to define what actually is a shot on target.
Whichever keeper makes the most saves, then it's his team who lose, or something similar? But of course that wouldn't allow for clearances off the line from other players.
If it could be demonstrated that there wouldn't be any ambiguity over what constitutes a shot on target, then I feel this method would be preferable to penalties for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 13:50:27 GMT
A massive game of Guess Who? In the Centre Circle.
Obviously we would need to make sure that both Bojan and Muniesa were on the pitch at the end of 90 mins.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 11, 2016 13:51:22 GMT
A massive game of Guess Who? In the Centre Circle. Obviously we would need to make sure that both Bojan and Muniesa were on the pitch at the end of 90 mins. but what happens if 1 of the questions relates to skin colour and SJW is on the pitch?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 14:21:23 GMT
A massive game of Guess Who? In the Centre Circle. Obviously we would need to make sure that both Bojan and Muniesa were on the pitch at the end of 90 mins. but what happens if 1 of the questions relates to skin colour and SJW is on the pitch? Best steer clear and rely on the tried & trusted "does he have a hat?", "does he have a beard?" etc.
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Feb 11, 2016 14:24:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Feb 11, 2016 14:24:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by interestedobserver on Feb 11, 2016 16:05:08 GMT
Penalties/US-styled shootout before the match. Winner of the shootout goes through if the match is drawn.
Alternatively, shootout before extra-time.
|
|
|
Post by trainstobrazil on Feb 11, 2016 16:20:47 GMT
There is nothing wrong with penalties. Fundamentally the idea of football is to kick the ball in the goal, so penalties is the best way of deciding a game.
They shouldn't be taken before the game either.
|
|
|
Post by scfcwebby on Feb 11, 2016 16:29:58 GMT
Thumb war between the captains
|
|
|
Post by turtlefox on Feb 11, 2016 16:42:02 GMT
You could have sudden death free kicks from outside the box. At least the whole team is involved instead of just a one on one. Penalties are so make or break though and do give a game that may have been a boring stale mate some sort of excitement at the end.
|
|
|
Post by chrispk76 on Feb 11, 2016 18:05:23 GMT
Under pulis I would have said a tug of war between the teams Now we have bojan, affelay and Shaq in the team it might be better have tug of penis
|
|
|
Post by stokiejoe on Feb 11, 2016 18:51:12 GMT
Golden goal has been tried, cruel as it is penalties are based on football skills.
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Feb 11, 2016 19:16:51 GMT
penalties are fine, it's still a bit raw having been at anfield, but its better than the alternatives, it takes skill, and nerve, and is great drama.
Plus we have done well at it over the past few years...
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Feb 11, 2016 19:17:36 GMT
Penalties/US-styled shootout before the match. Winner of the shootout goes through if the match is drawn. Alternatively, shootout before extra-time. This - the alternative bit I mean. Have the shoot out before extra time to determine the winner if the result after extra time is a draw. Very simple and ensures a winner is reached by playing football.
|
|
|
Post by interestedobserver on Feb 11, 2016 20:09:32 GMT
Penalties/US-styled shootout before the match. Winner of the shootout goes through if the match is drawn. Alternatively, shootout before extra-time. This - the alternative bit I mean. Have the shoot out before extra time to determine the winner if the result after extra time is a draw. Very simple and ensures a winner is reached by playing football. I don't get why people don't like it. It really isn't all that different from the away-goals rule.
|
|
|
Post by Silkystoke on Feb 11, 2016 20:10:27 GMT
A game of ping pong..!!!!
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Feb 11, 2016 20:10:27 GMT
Under pulis I would have said a tug of war between the teams Now we have bojan, affelay and Shaq in the team it might be better have tug of penis Shaqs low centre of gravity and the fact his thighs are like tree trunks - I think he'd bepretty good at tug of war.
|
|
|
Post by chrispk76 on Feb 11, 2016 21:39:01 GMT
Under pulis I would have said a tug of war between the teams Now we have bojan, affelay and Shaq in the team it might be better have tug of penis Shaqs low centre of gravity and the fact his thighs are like tree trunks - I think he'd bepretty good at tug of war. By The way he's easily knocked off the ball I think his upper body strength means he won't be able hold the rope for long enough ????
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Feb 11, 2016 21:47:51 GMT
2 attackers vs 1 defender and goalkeeper and the attackers have 20 seconds to score. The time ends if the goalkeeper has the ball in his hands or the ball goes out of play. You can only use the same outfield player twice out of 5 tries each
|
|
|
Post by skip on Feb 11, 2016 22:19:45 GMT
Next goal wins like when it got dark on the rec.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 22:56:56 GMT
My suggestion is that if the result is level at 90mins the team with the most shots on target during the game goes through, it really could be that simple. I think this would encourage more attacking football and in turn produce more goals therefore hopefully in turn meaning that a match is won fair and square during the alloted 90mins match. It could be tweaked and adapted to perhaps be the deciding factor after extra time as opposed to the 90mins to just eliminate the penalty option. I'm convinced this idea would create more goals and could make extra time and penalties a thing of the past. The penalty option could still be utilised should the rare occasion occur where the score is level as is shots on target but think it would be very unlikely. Whether the shots on target stats are displayed/conveyed to teams during the game so they know where they stand could be debated to.
Yeah something along these lines I think but it would probably have to be confined to the 30 minutes of extra time.
Although I appreciate it sometimes hard to define what actually is a shot on target.
Whichever keeper makes the most saves, then it's his team who lose, or something similar? But of course that wouldn't allow for clearances off the line from other players.
If it could be demonstrated that there wouldn't be any ambiguity over what constitutes a shot on target, then I feel this method would be preferable to penalties for sure.
Wouldn't work. I remember a Man City where they hammered the opposition and had something like 23 shots but only 2 on target. The other team had something like 4 shots, 3 on target despite this. Penalties is the correct way. Fuck people's emotions
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Feb 11, 2016 23:27:04 GMT
10mins of 5 a side.
|
|
|
Post by bornscfcdiescfc on Feb 11, 2016 23:31:35 GMT
A Beer and a takeaway
|
|
|
Post by enuntio on Feb 12, 2016 3:31:40 GMT
An extra 7 minutes 30 seconds for each half of extra time and a minimum of 11 penalties Minimum 11 penalties makes some sense Take into account red/ yellow cards Territorial advantage - team with the ball in opponents half for most time wins? If a team finishes without 11 players then allow the opposition to choose who will have to take 2 penalties
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Feb 12, 2016 5:59:11 GMT
Just keep playing, eventually there will be a goal.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Feb 12, 2016 7:37:19 GMT
What about replays. It was never a problem in the 70s. Also make maximum ticket price of £5 adults children free. Season ticket holders go in free.
|
|
|
Post by heavysoul on Feb 12, 2016 7:48:10 GMT
Noughts and crosses? Or Hangman
|
|