|
Post by silverdollar on Feb 10, 2016 23:19:34 GMT
Penalties are very cruel on the individual and also extra time puts even more stress on bodies that are already over played. My alternative is no extra time. Go into seven a side after ninety minutes, two seven and half minute halves but only if no one scores. First goal wins! If no score after fifteen minutes(very unlikely), go down to five a side. At least the blame would no longer rest upon an individual. What are your alternatives?
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Feb 10, 2016 23:30:20 GMT
Sudden death after extra time !!!
|
|
|
Post by marcofstoke on Feb 10, 2016 23:33:10 GMT
There would still be blame on a individual on a first goal wins basis Goalkeeper error o.g. Silly handball leading to a penalty winner etc etc
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 10, 2016 23:33:14 GMT
I'd like to see a 'winner takes all' punch up between the respective managers.
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Feb 10, 2016 23:39:30 GMT
Free kicks with walls of only 3 men
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2016 23:46:57 GMT
Nice Mascot fight should do it
|
|
|
Post by potterglen on Feb 10, 2016 23:49:13 GMT
Flip a coin, heads we win - tails you lose.
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Feb 10, 2016 23:50:46 GMT
Jousting.
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Feb 11, 2016 0:16:04 GMT
Keep playing until a player drops dead from exhaustion.
OR
Force the managers to remove one player every five minutes until a team scores.
I'd love to see a one on one sudden death between goalkeepers.
|
|
|
Post by djduncanjames on Feb 11, 2016 0:22:46 GMT
You know you could be on to something here...
|
|
|
Post by cooper67 on Feb 11, 2016 0:34:33 GMT
A royal rumble between all the players and managers in the centre circle.
Last man standing rules.
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Feb 11, 2016 1:04:24 GMT
I like the ice hockey style shoot out which they used in the MLS for a while. The player gets the ball 35 yards out and has 5 seconds to score - you still get the blame for messing up, but it'd be pretty fun.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Feb 11, 2016 1:13:34 GMT
Keep playing until a player drops dead from exhaustion. OR Force the managers to remove one player every five minutes until a team scores. I'd love to see a one on one sudden death between goalkeepers. The National Hockey League has gone to something similar. 3 v 3 sudden death OT. I am not a hockey fan but I hear it's very popular with the fans. How about 8 v 8 with no offside?
|
|
|
Post by enuntio on Feb 11, 2016 1:30:26 GMT
An extra 7 minutes 30 seconds for each half of extra time and a minimum of 11 penalties
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Feb 11, 2016 1:40:14 GMT
Keep playing until a player drops dead from exhaustion. OR Force the managers to remove one player every five minutes until a team scores. I'd love to see a one on one sudden death between goalkeepers. The National Hockey League has gone to something similar. 3 v 3 sudden death OT. I am not a hockey fan but I hear it's very popular with the fans. How about 8 v 8 with no offside? i think hockey can get away with it because they can, and do, make substitutions constantly. If a full field game after 120 minutes went to 8 v 8 players I don't know how the players would cope.
|
|
|
Post by hanibal7 on Feb 11, 2016 3:02:05 GMT
Pullis would play 6 centre halves just to spoil the game
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_Shawjosh on Feb 11, 2016 6:08:17 GMT
Heads and volleys
|
|
|
Post by euan ouzami on Feb 11, 2016 6:47:23 GMT
Play the penalties before the game. This means it would seem less cruel on the player(s) who missed. Would also mean teams couldn't play for penalties at the end of extra time
|
|
|
Post by stokebloke on Feb 11, 2016 7:10:27 GMT
Another replay!?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 7:39:15 GMT
Lets say there are 11 players from each side still on the pitch, assuming no sendings off, or injuries after all 3 subs ( if not then the side with the most has to eliminate players to create equilibrium ) Starting with the lowest Squad No vs Lowest Squad No have a vote as to who has the fittest wife or girlfriend...The team with the fittest wags go through...Any player who does not have a wag is automatically disqualified and his opposite No wins by default...
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Feb 11, 2016 7:43:04 GMT
An extra 7 minutes 30 seconds for each half of extra time and a minimum of 11 penalties Minimum 11 penalties makes some sense Take into account red/ yellow cards Territorial advantage - team with the ball in opponents half for most time wins?
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Feb 11, 2016 7:45:31 GMT
Play until someone score for the winner.
|
|
|
Post by callas12 on Feb 11, 2016 10:04:25 GMT
My suggestion is that if the result is level at 90mins the team with the most shots on target during the game goes through, it really could be that simple. I think this would encourage more attacking football and in turn produce more goals therefore hopefully in turn meaning that a match is won fair and square during the alloted 90mins match. It could be tweaked and adapted to perhaps be the deciding factor after extra time as opposed to the 90mins to just eliminate the penalty option. I'm convinced this idea would create more goals and could make extra time and penalties a thing of the past. The penalty option could still be utilised should the rare occasion occur where the score is level as is shots on target but think it would be very unlikely.
Whether the shots on target stats are displayed/conveyed to teams during the game so they know where they stand could be debated to.
|
|
|
Post by kentpotter on Feb 11, 2016 10:11:07 GMT
Nice Mascot fight should do it Much as I think the a punch-up between mascots is a brilliant idea, in reality I've always favoured the extra time/golden goal/next one wins idea. Brutal yes, but no more so than penalties, IMHO
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Feb 11, 2016 10:17:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by overthehills on Feb 11, 2016 10:27:28 GMT
crossbar challenge, all 11 take a kick each, whoever gets the most wins. keepy uppy - all 11 have a ball each, last man wins football darts - make centre cirle into different scoring zones, each player shoots from 6 yard box. highest team total wins.
|
|
|
Post by iloveglennwhelan on Feb 11, 2016 11:15:33 GMT
If you have Glenn Whelan on your team you win
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 11, 2016 11:50:02 GMT
A good, old-fashioned movie or pop trivia quiz.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 11, 2016 12:05:42 GMT
That’s what brummies say to bees Anyway the real answer is… replays Too many games? Rubbish.
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Feb 11, 2016 12:17:04 GMT
Spoof or Rock, Paper, Scissors or Robot Wars or Have the penalty shoot-out BEFORE the match kicks off or Count the corners for each side, subtract the number of times they were offside, whoever's tally is the highest wins
|
|