|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 14:53:40 GMT
He got the ball, the other guy was 4 feet away, take the I hate Arsenal glasses off. Decent tackle. A 2 footed tackle is a red card. Like when we had Faye sent off at Boro in 2008. Ref was right then ref is wrong now. There is a difference in going in 2 footed feet off the floor & that tackle by Flamini, he had no intention to injure a person that was 4 foot away, not even going for the ball, compared to other tackles that people on here will no doubt bring up.
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 14:56:13 GMT
Peer pressure from the Bournemouth players & fans, there was fuck all wrong with the challenge. The intent is enough for a red. That is the law of the game not me being pedantic. The intent too win a ball, that the opponent has no chance of reaching, is enough for a RED?
|
|
|
Post by rickyisgod on Feb 7, 2016 14:56:56 GMT
I am sure he didn't intend to injure him but that is a red card day long blurtonboy. If a stoke player does the same next week on the same ground he will be sent off and rightly so
|
|
|
Post by Theninjabadger on Feb 7, 2016 14:58:42 GMT
A 2 footed tackle is a red card. Like when we had Faye sent off at Boro in 2008. Ref was right then ref is wrong now. There is a difference in going in 2 footed feet off the floor & that tackle by Flamini, he had no intention to injure a person that was 4 foot away, not even going for the ball, compared to other tackles that people on here will no doubt bring up. So as long as there is no intent it can't be a sending off? Some off the worse tackles I've seen have been without intent. The laws of the game say it's a sending off so he should of been sent off
|
|
|
Post by Theninjabadger on Feb 7, 2016 15:00:22 GMT
The intent is enough for a red. That is the law of the game not me being pedantic. The intent too win a ball, that the opponent has no chance of reaching, is enough for a RED? If the opponent had no chance of winning the ball why did he have to jump into the tackle with 2 feet? Why not run onto the ball?
|
|
|
Post by pearo on Feb 7, 2016 15:05:58 GMT
A 2 footed tackle is a red card. Like when we had Faye sent off at Boro in 2008. Ref was right then ref is wrong now. There is a difference in going in 2 footed feet off the floor & that tackle by Flamini, he had no intention to injure a person that was 4 foot away, not even going for the ball, compared to other tackles that people on here will no doubt bring up. The reason that Gosling was 4 feet away was that he had already seen the intent in Flamini's tackle and took preventative action to save himself from serious injury. Certain red card every time, Ref bottled it.
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 15:08:06 GMT
If you all believe, that was a red card, then i suggest writing too the FA, instead of ranting your bag off on here about fucking Arsenal AGAIN.
|
|
|
Post by rickyisgod on Feb 7, 2016 15:09:44 GMT
It's about a tackle I couldn't give a fuck what team he plays for
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 15:15:08 GMT
There is a difference in going in 2 footed feet off the floor & that tackle by Flamini, he had no intention to injure a person that was 4 foot away, not even going for the ball, compared to other tackles that people on here will no doubt bring up. The reason that Gosling was 4 feet away was that he had already seen the intent in Flamini's tackle and took preventative action to save himself from serious injury. Certain red card every time, Ref bottled it. So how far away from seeing Flamini's intent did Gosling look into his eyes & think fuck that for a tackle, I'm going jump out the way, before realising , well I'm not that close really, but if he slides in, then i will go down holding me leg & we might get a free kick?
|
|
|
Post by pearo on Feb 7, 2016 15:21:51 GMT
The reason that Gosling was 4 feet away was that he had already seen the intent in Flamini's tackle and took preventative action to save himself from serious injury. Certain red card every time, Ref bottled it. So how far away from seeing Flamini's intent did Gosling look into his eyes & think fuck that for a tackle, I'm going jump out the way, before realising , well I'm not that close really, but if he slides in, then i will go down holding me leg & we might get a free kick? Some footballers, like people in others walks of life, have more vision and awareness than others. The moment that Flamini raised both feet from the ground and lunged at Gosling, he had the vision to slow his momentum so the collision was as minimal as possible from his perspective. As mentioned by others on this thread, under curent FA guidelines the act of intent is enough to warrant a red card.
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 15:31:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 15:31:46 GMT
After that interview I've lost all dislike of Aaron Ramsey. How can you feel strongly about somebody with no personality at all?
He certainly isn't going to get many after dinner speaking gigs when he retires.
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 15:34:49 GMT
So how far away from seeing Flamini's intent did Gosling look into his eyes & think fuck that for a tackle, I'm going jump out the way, before realising , well I'm not that close really, but if he slides in, then i will go down holding me leg & we might get a free kick? Some footballers, like people in others walks of life, have more vision and awareness than others. Name them & their professions
|
|
|
Post by sharonbeech21 on Feb 7, 2016 15:37:52 GMT
Yet again an Arsenal player gets away with murder. How the hell he got away with a yellow when it was clearly a red card all day long. If a stoke player had done it he would have see a red card for sure. Two footed and dangerous disgraceful tackle
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 15:38:12 GMT
So how far away from seeing Flamini's intent did Gosling look into his eyes & think fuck that for a tackle, I'm going jump out the way, before realising , well I'm not that close really, but if he slides in, then i will go down holding me leg & we might get a free kick? Some footballers, like people in others walks of life, have more vision and awareness than others. The moment that Flamini raised both feet from the ground and lunged at Gosling, he had the vision to slow his momentum so the collision was as minimal as possible from his perspective. As mentioned by others on this thread, under curent FA guidelines the act of intent is enough to warrant a red card. No he realised he could not get the loose ball, he was 4 foot away.
|
|
|
Post by Amo on Feb 7, 2016 15:38:33 GMT
What about the 2 footed off the floor tackle by Flamini that gets yellow card?
I know the card colour had that been tackle been made by a player from a team that wear red and white stripes!
A very poor decision by the referee as he had a very good view of the incident.
And they tell us that "the top teams" don't get favours?
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 15:43:01 GMT
So how far away from seeing Flamini's intent did Gosling look into his eyes & think fuck that for a tackle, I'm going jump out the way, before realising , well I'm not that close really, but if he slides in, then i will go down holding me leg & we might get a free kick? Some footballers, like people in others walks of life, have more vision and awareness than others. The moment that Flamini raised both feet from the ground and lunged at Gosling, he had the vision to slow his momentum so the collision was as minimal as possible from his perspective. As mentioned by others on this thread, under curent FA guidelines the act of intent is enough to warrant a red card.Intent? Intent what,too win the ball when the other player is not even in the vicinity of the actual tackle?
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 15:44:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 15:44:15 GMT
What about the 2 footed off the floor tackle by Flamini that gets yellow card? I know the card colour had that been tackle been made by a player from a team that wear red and white stripes! A very poor decision by the referee as he had a very good view of the incident. And they tell us that "the top teams" don't get favours? The interviewer's 'Of course, you didn't mean to hurt him' comment, which was supposed to be a question was equally as revealing. I can't even get annoyed about the bias in football anymore. We were subjected to it starting 8 years ago and it's finally just become normal.
|
|
|
Post by leicspotter on Feb 7, 2016 15:47:01 GMT
Some footballers, like people in others walks of life, have more vision and awareness than others. The moment that Flamini raised both feet from the ground and lunged at Gosling, he had the vision to slow his momentum so the collision was as minimal as possible from his perspective. As mentioned by others on this thread, under curent FA guidelines the act of intent is enough to warrant a red card.Intent? Intent what,too win the ball when the other player is not even in the vicinity of the actual tackle? Not seen it and don't really care but, Blurton: to no too!!! Too is used to denote "also" as in, Dave likes Stoke and I do too
|
|
|
Post by luciani on Feb 7, 2016 15:48:46 GMT
Can't stand Arsenal, but to be honest, I think the Ref got it just about right.
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 15:56:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2016 15:56:46 GMT
It was a definite red card deserving tackle.
It was as close to the "perfect" two footed lunge as you could wish to see.
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 16:04:29 GMT
Intent? Intent what,too win the ball when the other player is not even in the vicinity of the actual tackle? Not seen it and don't really care but, Blurton: to no too!!! Too is used to denote "also" as in, Dave likes Stoke and I do too I doo noot care aboot a fucking o being missplaced ( nootice the extra s? ). Yuoo have noot seen it & doo nooot really care, but pulled me up on my graaammarrr.
|
|
|
Post by blurtonboy on Feb 7, 2016 16:06:08 GMT
It was a definite red card deserving tackle. It was as close to the "perfect" two footed lunge as you could wish to see. Was it fuck, smiley face wank thing.
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 19:13:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Feb 7, 2016 19:13:18 GMT
I've just seen the highlights and post match interviews on SSN
Two things from those hypocritical cunts.
Flamini said it was a 50/50and they both went in hard.
Wenger actually had the audacity to say it was a foul for Arsenal.
Cunts cunts cunts
|
|
boz
Spectator
Posts: 33
|
Post by boz on Feb 7, 2016 19:17:34 GMT
Fucking unbelievable Wenger thought it was a foul to the Arse......what a wanker,......you just can't make those kind of challenges anymore..simple as
|
|
|
Post by Theninjabadger on Feb 7, 2016 19:18:08 GMT
I've just seen the highlights and post match interviews on SSN Two things from those hypocritical cunts. Flamini said it was a 50/50and they both went in hard. Wenger actually had the audacity to say it was a foul for Arsenal. Cunts cunts cunts You mean like the push in the back on Shawcross seconds before the tackle on Ramsey? Funnily enough that never got mentioned by Mr Wenger
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 19:20:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Feb 7, 2016 19:20:47 GMT
I've just seen the highlights and post match interviews on SSN Two things from those hypocritical cunts. Flamini said it was a 50/50and they both went in hard. Wenger actually had the audacity to say it was a foul for Arsenal. Cunts cunts cunts You mean like the push in the back on Shawcross seconds before the tackle on Ramsey? Funnily enough that never got mentioned by Mr Wenger I hate bringing that challenge up but you can't act like that over accidents to your players when your players commit fouls like that. The day he leaves English football (a week after the sky eulogy) will be a great day
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Feb 7, 2016 21:29:31 GMT
When he was at Stoke the other week he never stopped yapping in to the refs ear. Horrible prick
|
|
|
Post by silverdollar on Feb 7, 2016 21:37:28 GMT
Can you imagine if a Stoke player had done that in the recent televised game against Arsenal. The camera wouldn't have left Wenger's face and it would be all talk of the previous Ramsey incident. Just disgraceful all round. I have seen two tackles in that game one by Flamini and one actually by Ramsay and I have to say that balanced with the incident involving Ramsay and Shawcross the only good thing is that no one was seriously injured long term. In terms of a team playing attractive football I have always admired Wenger but I am beginning to smell a whiff of hypocrisy that does nothing but undermine his reputation. As good a footballer Ramsay is he needs to grow a pair. He needs to take a long look at himself and next time shake Shawcross by the hand and apologise!
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Feb 7, 2016 22:53:54 GMT
Can you imagine if a Stoke player had done that in the recent televised game against Arsenal. The camera wouldn't have left Wenger's face and it would be all talk of the previous Ramsey incident. Just disgraceful all round. I have seen two tackles in that game one by Flamini and one actually by Ramsay and I have to say that balanced with the incident involving Ramsay and Shawcross the only good thing is that no one was seriously injured long term. In terms of a team playing attractive football I have always admired Wenger but I am beginning to smell a whiff of hypocrisy that does nothing but undermine his reputation. As good a footballer Ramsay is he needs to grow a pair. He needs to take a long look at himself and next time shake Shawcross by the hand and apologise! Beginning to smell a whiff of hypocrisy about Arsene Wenger is like getting a vague inkling that Duncan Goodhew might be starting to go bald.
|
|
|
Flamini
Feb 7, 2016 23:34:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by nenepotter on Feb 7, 2016 23:34:01 GMT
Can you imagine if a Stoke player had done that in the recent televised game against Arsenal. The camera wouldn't have left Wenger's face and it would be all talk of the previous Ramsey incident. Just disgraceful all round. I have seen two tackles in that game one by Flamini and one actually by Ramsay and I have to say that balanced with the incident involving Ramsay and Shawcross the only good thing is that no one was seriously injured long term. In terms of a team playing attractive football I have always admired Wenger but I am beginning to smell a whiff of hypocrisy that does nothing but undermine his reputation. As good a footballer Ramsay is he needs to grow a pair. He needs to take a long look at himself and next time shake Shawcross by the hand and apologise! Your talking about the actions of someone with character, personality and calibre,... don't waste you breath on Aaron Ramsey... unfortunately I just did
|
|