|
Post by ukcstokie on Nov 22, 2015 1:03:26 GMT
I like Jeff but he is an open saints fan as well as Hartlepool and they also lost so not much to shout about. Nor convinced it was a stone wall penalty me self and they did have one or two dives in the box which may have swayed the refs desiccation. What was funny though the Stoke fans were singing oh when the reds go marching in and the camera panned to the saints fans and the commentator said the saints fans are doing there best to the team going and it was tumble weed stuff as it was us singing not them. Oh and how many times did Ian Dowie contradict himself as the co commentator? Jeff Stelling lives not far from me in strong Southampton supporting territory.
|
|
|
Post by WoodbineWright2@ on Nov 22, 2015 6:10:13 GMT
Wolly got lucky. Stone waller every day. But the ref obviously thought otherwise and tbf it's about time we got a few breaks because normally it's us suffering the shit decisions. No sympathy for Southampton whatsoever !!
|
|
|
Post by basingstokie on Nov 22, 2015 6:57:51 GMT
At the time I thought we'll be lucky to get away with that.
This board would be going mental if it was the other way round
|
|
|
Post by CalgaryPotter on Nov 22, 2015 7:27:54 GMT
Pelle should have been booked for diving the fucking nonce
|
|
|
Post by GlennA on Nov 22, 2015 8:27:37 GMT
Doesn't matter, Super Jack would have saved it anyway.
|
|
|
Post by whydelilah on Nov 22, 2015 10:11:57 GMT
Pelle should have been booked for diving the fucking nonce
|
|
|
Post by datguy on Nov 22, 2015 10:15:39 GMT
Pelle should have been booked for diving the fucking nonce
|
|
|
Post by richardparker on Nov 22, 2015 10:22:17 GMT
Wasn't intentional, not a penalty, was looking to tumble from the start. I don't have the rule book to hand however, my understanding is that the foul needs to be intentional. Thus, Wolly's was not a penalty. On the other hand, Arnie's body check was a definite pen!
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Nov 22, 2015 10:33:14 GMT
Things are looking up. Pundits on MOD complimenting us, and Referees giving us the benefit of the doubt ! When we had decisions like that against us we claimed " Big Club Bias". Are we becoming a big club ?
If he had given the pen we would not had much to complain about. Saw it on MOD this morning and thought we were lucky.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 10:36:17 GMT
I was right in front of it and he went to kind of half volley it away on the turn, watching the ball all the way. Just so happened Pelle was running into his half volley but he didn't see him as he was turning.
One of them really, it's a penalty to Southampton fans, not a penalty for Stoke fans.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Nov 22, 2015 10:37:49 GMT
Its was a def penalty, if it was against us then we would be screaming injustices.
Since when does a pen have to be intentional??? That's a new one.
There are loads of pens given for clumsy tackles in the area that are not intentional. A foul is a foul
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Nov 22, 2015 10:47:51 GMT
I was right in front of it and he went to kind of half volley it away on the turn, watching the ball all the way. Just so happened Pelle was running into his half volley but he didn't see him as he was turning. One of them really, it's a penalty to Southampton fans, not a penalty for Stoke fans. Wrong , It's a penalty to Southampton fans and a penalty to Stoke fans ! The overwhelming majority of stoke fans lthink it's a pen ! It's as clear as fuckin day '
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Nov 22, 2015 10:50:34 GMT
Its was a def penalty, if it was against us then we would be screaming injustices. Since when does a pen have to be intentional??? That's a new one. There are loads of pens given for clumsy tackles in the area that are not intentional. A foul is a foul Sorry that is not correct. The rules of the game clearly state in print" If a player intentionally....) same applies to all foul situations. This is why I get p....d off when a ball hits a players arm and costs a pen. He has to Intentionlly handle, not accidentally.
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Nov 22, 2015 10:57:12 GMT
Its was a def penalty, if it was against us then we would be screaming injustices. Since when does a pen have to be intentional??? That's a new one. There are loads of pens given for clumsy tackles in the area that are not intentional. A foul is a foul Sorry that is not correct. The rules of the game clearly state in print" If a player intentionally....) same applies to all foul situations. This is why I get p....d off when a ball hits a players arm and costs a pen. He has to Intentionlly handle, not accidentally. Again wrong No where in the rules does it say that for s penalty to be awarded a player has to intentionally handle it , what it does say is three things need to be considered 1) is the arm in an unnatural position 2)the speed and trajectory of the ball 3)the distance travelled upon impact
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Nov 22, 2015 11:03:19 GMT
Thought it was a penalty, tbh. We definitely deserved to win though so fate dealt us a good card on this occasion. Goooaaarn Stoke, hopefully the best season ever awaits us!!!!
|
|
|
Post by rorymscfc on Nov 22, 2015 11:06:58 GMT
Either way it's definitely one that could have been interpreted differently on another day by another referee.
We seem to have benefitted from a few potentially game changing decisions recently - Jack's challenge on Ayew at Swansea, Jack on Remy vs Chelsea and then yesterday. Hopefully we're not setting ourselves up for a complete shafting in the near future...
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Nov 22, 2015 11:10:31 GMT
Sorry that is not correct. The rules of the game clearly state in print" If a player intentionally....) same applies to all foul situations. This is why I get p....d off when a ball hits a players arm and costs a pen. He has to Intentionlly handle, not accidentally. Again wrong No where in the rules does it say that for s penalty to be awarded a player has to intentionally handle it , what it does say is three things need to be considered 1) is the arm in an unnatural position 2)the speed and trajectory of the ball 3)the distance travelled upon impact Google "Football rule 12" I must admit they have changed the word Intentionlly to Deliberetly.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Nov 22, 2015 11:13:00 GMT
It was a penalty, I mean, he's swung a wild leg and caught him. Fuck me Southampton are a bunch of odious twats though. Some of the diving yesterday was infuriating.
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Nov 22, 2015 11:18:32 GMT
Again wrong No where in the rules does it say that for s penalty to be awarded a player has to intentionally handle it , what it does say is three things need to be considered 1) is the arm in an unnatural position 2)the speed and trajectory of the ball 3)the distance travelled upon impact Google "Football rule 12" I must admit they have changed the word Intentionlly to Deliberetly. It's a grey area I will give you that but deliberate Or intentional don't mean what you probably think it does !
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Nov 22, 2015 11:29:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by takeshikovacs on Nov 22, 2015 11:40:19 GMT
Could only have been a more obvious penalty if he'd taken his legs off with a chainsaw.
|
|
|
Post by cozmick on Nov 22, 2015 12:42:17 GMT
Wolly almost volleyed him out of the Brit. And some say not a pen? Fucking Nora.
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Nov 22, 2015 12:46:28 GMT
But Wolly's arm wasn't in an unnatural position, he wasn't running. His left leg mind.....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2015 12:48:21 GMT
Stop press! -'Soccer pundit offers opinion shocker '
(I thought it was what they are paid to do)
and yes its was a penno
Nice when things go our way for a change
|
|