|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:32:26 GMT
We have ignored gravity for 6 windows and she is knocking on the door expecting payment . gravity is knocking on the door expecting payment? Were you a crack baby?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:33:11 GMT
Prestwich A whole sentence without cunt in it well done ! I didn't call you a cunt, Charles Bronson did
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Sept 1, 2015 21:38:18 GMT
Prest
Tell him to Fuck himself then fat bald dyslexic twat
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 1, 2015 21:40:11 GMT
Prest Tell him to Fuck himself then fat bald dyslexic twat Did you really just call somebody out for being dyslexic Benji? Brilliant!
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Sept 1, 2015 21:43:43 GMT
Benjamin, can you change your name to my favourite biscuit please?!
'Twat Biscuit'
Definition - The mass of fat on a very large woman, located between the stomach and twat. Women sporting twat biscuits usually wear very tight shirt, often so short that the tummy is exposed and flops about over the top of their twat biscuit and jeans.
Thanks for your cooperation.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Sept 1, 2015 21:43:56 GMT
Paul
Delighted to please !
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Sept 1, 2015 21:44:17 GMT
Mark Langdon (Football Editor on The Racing Post) has just expressed some reservations with our window activities on talksport. Said we look a bit unbalanced and haven't replaced N'Zonzi and surprised we weren't busy today. There's your independent professional tipsters view and he knows his onions. On the Wollschied thing, it's appears (maybe plainly obvious) that we had to sign him if we wanted the initial loan. We needed an experienced CB at the time due to crippling injuries. It now seems that the manager has massive reservations about hm especially playing behind a new midfield pairing that has yet to gel properly. The bloke isn't a bad player, but it's obvious he's not the answer with our current set up. Isn't a bad player you have to be joking right, Hughes had four months to evaluate him, knew Ryan was struggling with back issues, signed him and then sold Huth, as for having to sign him prior to agreeing a loan deal surely an idiot would have smelt a rat, what a huge fucking balls up, are you that blinkered to Hughes fallibility's.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Sept 1, 2015 21:45:42 GMT
General
Thanks for the word picture but I will stick thank you .
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 21:48:17 GMT
and he knows his onions. On the Wollschied thing, it's appears (maybe plainly obvious) that we had to sign him if we wanted the initial loan.  We needed an experienced CB at the time due to crippling injuries.  It now seems that the manager has massive reservations about hm especially playing behind a new midfield pairing that has yet to gel properly.  The bloke isn't a bad player, but it's obvious he's not the answer with our current set up. Isn't a bad player you have to be joking  right, Hughes had four months to evaluate him, knew Ryan was struggling with back issues, signed him and then sold Huth, as for having to sign him prior to agreeing a loan deal surely an idiot would have smelt a rat, what a huge fucking balls up, are you that blinkered to Hughes fallibility's.  What are your thoughts on the sale of Huth? You've kept your cards pretty close to your chest on that subject
|
|
|
Post by michelle1863 on Sept 1, 2015 21:55:29 GMT
Youve basically put there how I feel. I don't know whether to say I 100% agree with this or just thanks for putting down what I wanted say Mate i would say that's how a lot/most Stokies feel right now but apparently we're knicker wetters I wouldn't call you knicker wetters - but you may be prematurely ejaculating your worries at this stage of the season!!!
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Sept 1, 2015 21:56:12 GMT
General Thanks for the word picture but I will stick thank you . Good win for your boys tonight, troll. 1-0 against Carlisle in the JPT.
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Sept 1, 2015 21:56:27 GMT
Mate i would say that's how a lot/most Stokies feel right now but apparently we're knicker wetters I wouldn't call you knicker wetters - but you may be prematurely ejaculating your worries at this stage of the season!!! Now now i've never had that problem
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Sept 1, 2015 21:57:16 GMT
Isn't a bad player you have to be joking right, Hughes had four months to evaluate him, knew Ryan was struggling with back issues, signed him and then sold Huth, as for having to sign him prior to agreeing a loan deal surely an idiot would have smelt a rat, what a huge fucking balls up, are you that blinkered to Hughes fallibility's. What are your thoughts on the sale of Huth? You've kept your cards pretty close to your chest on that subject I have not aa well you know I think it was a shit decision ! what are your thoughts on the matter ? try and be honest if possible ! was it good business ?, sensible transfer dealing ? come on give us your honest opinion.
|
|
|
Post by chiswickpotter on Sept 1, 2015 21:59:28 GMT
2012/13 season, one win in our first 10 games, 9 points after 10 games…our starting XI on average
34 goals in the whole season
Begovic Cameron Shawcross Huth Wilson N'Zonzi Whelan Adam Walters Crouch Etherington
20 games for Shotton and 19 for Wilko
6 disastrous windows on…best XI
Butland Johnson Shawcross Muniesa Pieters Whelan Van Ginkel Shaqiri Bojan Arnautovic Diouf
Subs Cameron Joselu Affelay etc
Moving forward or backwards? I know which team I would rather have
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 22:00:27 GMT
What are your thoughts on the sale of Huth? You've kept your cards pretty close to your chest on that subject I have not aa well you know I think it was a shit decision ! what are your thoughts on the matter ? try and be honest if possible ! was it good business ?, sensible transfer dealing ? come on give us your honest opinion. Huth was a high earner not in Hughes' plans as I believe he didn't think he was comfortable enough with the ball at his feet compared to our other defenders. So based on that yes I can completely understand why he cashed in on him and allowed him to move on and play regular first team football.
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Sept 1, 2015 22:17:46 GMT
I think the money one is a difficult issue for us , we get the TV money for sure but not a lot else , few if any decent corporate sponsors low gate receipts in comparison to others and I think our wages at the last accounts were 13th in the league so may have gone up a bit . Still not convinced about all of our signings or the balance of the team but the fact our outlay on fees is low does not tell the full story
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Sept 1, 2015 22:18:19 GMT
I have not aa well you know I think it was a shit decision ! what are your thoughts on the matter ? try and be honest if possible ! was it good business ?, sensible transfer dealing ? come on give us your honest opinion. Huth was a high earner not in Hughes' plans as I believe he didn't think he was comfortable enough with the ball at his feet compared to our other defenders. So based on that yes I can completely understand why he cashed in on him and allowed him to move on and play regular first team football. Fair comments though I do not agree and never will whilst he was playing alongside such cultured ball players as Bardsley, Cameron and Wilson, how do you feel about Wolfy as a replacement in the squad for Huth ? considering the known situation with Ryan and we had Wolfy here for four months prior to signing him was that good business ? who would you trust to do Ryan's job this season Huth or Wolfy ? bearing in mind Hughes appears not to trust Wolfy to start was it a shrewd decision to sign him ?.
|
|
|
Post by steve66 on Sept 1, 2015 23:57:52 GMT
Same, there's been a dead wasp on the window sill for about a week now, along with a Wispa wrapper. I need to look where I went wrong in life. That's deep emotional shit there! Start to worry when you have 4 wispa wrappers and 7 suspect public-like hairs there. Which reminds me, i really need to tidy my flat! You have 7 different public hairs, would they be from 7 different members of the pubic?
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Sept 2, 2015 0:10:02 GMT
Paul Delighted to please ! What's wrong with you?
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 2, 2015 0:13:36 GMT
Paul Delighted to please ! What's wrong with you? do some people on this actually know him
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Sept 2, 2015 0:21:03 GMT
do some people on this actually know him I'd be very surprised
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 2, 2015 0:25:32 GMT
do some people on this actually know him I'd be very surprised he's got followers!!
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Sept 2, 2015 1:10:47 GMT
We are weaker in one area. Centre back? Centre midfield? Gk arguably although Butland has been brilliant so far We are weak in the midfield with the Van Ginkel and Whelan partnership. It will only get better, Van Ginkel is adapting and he looks a great player.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Sept 2, 2015 3:15:12 GMT
Not heard you as downbeat for a while mate A bit pissed off with the club mate not the manager - all this talk from Scholes about shopping at the next level was/is total bollocks. I believe we've signed some good players, not necessarily the right ones for us. Not replacing N'Zonzi with a battle hardened experienced player is a mistake, a big one. It's not as if we haven't got the money - we're dripping in it. We could of shelled out on 2 or 3 top quality players for decent money that would of made a real difference. Instead I get the feeling we've missed the boat AGAIN. Put it this way, if we still had Zonz and Ryan was fit, with the signing of Shaqiri and Bojan coming back, I think we could of pushed for top 7. Now I think it will be 12th to 14th. Then you're starting again and finding it impossible to make signings like Shaqiri again. Exactly, Pugs. We should have used our positive profile from last season to buy the quality you speak of. We've shopped in Poundland again, apart from Shaqiri, and too many of our signings are gambles. I think Hughes has earned the right to be given good money to spend on players who can walk into the side, in the same way Pardew has for Palace.
|
|
|
Post by chicagostokie on Sept 2, 2015 3:58:56 GMT
Incredible. Stronger squad than we've ever had, broken our transfer record, signed players we could not have dreamed about 2 years ago, and still there's moaning.
We have at least 2 premier league players for every position:
GK: Butland. Given LB: Pieters, Muniesa, Wilson RB: Johnson, Bardsley, Cameron CB: Shawcross, Muniesa, Woolschied (sp), Cameron, Wilson DM: Whelen, VG, Cameron, Wilson CM: VG, Adam, Ireland, Affaley LM: Arnie, Affaley, Moha AM: Bojan, Ireland, Affaley, Shaq RM: Shaq, Walters, Wingie, Diouf FW: Diouf, Joselu, Wingie, Walters
How people can think this wasn't a good window I'll never know. Yes, we all wanted an Nzonzi replacement, but there's not that many out there. Yet we have a front 4, that can rotate, have pace, creativity and are extremely flexible - we will rip teams apart this season once they settle. Then we have a solid spine, which gets stronger when Ryan is back.
I've never been more excited to be a Stoke fan. I have no doubts we are a top 10 team. We will strengthen in January and who knows where we can go.
I'd love to know what the expectations are from a lot of you.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Sept 2, 2015 4:40:07 GMT
To be honest, mystified by the strategy - if there was one. It seemed a bit like a shot-gun approach - buy a bunch of potentially excellent players, many of whom have not lived up to there early promise and see where they can fit in. I've hired a lot of people over the last 30 odd years so I know a thing or two about recruiting. One of the general principles is to define the job requirements and then go out and search for the best person that happens TO BE AVAILABLE. Some times that's not the ideal candidate and sometimes the best available is an internal candidate (think GCam). Occasionally it's worth taking a chance on a candidate that's very bright but will require a lot development or retraining - however, it's not good to staff the whole department that way. That said, I am mildly optimistic - next 8-10 games will tell if we are moving forward, walking in place or going backwards relative to our peers (Wet Sham, Blue Bin Dippers, Swansea, Palarse, Red Bin Dippers, Soton, Newcastle, etc.)
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Sept 2, 2015 6:07:38 GMT
Isn't a bad player you have to be joking right, Hughes had four months to evaluate him, knew Ryan was struggling with back issues, signed him and then sold Huth, as for having to sign him prior to agreeing a loan deal surely an idiot would have smelt a rat, what a huge fucking balls up, are you that blinkered to Hughes fallibility's. What are your thoughts on the sale of Huth? You've kept your cards pretty close to your chest on that subject I agree with the sale of huth as he did not fit in the style of play which Hughes is instilling in the team what I don't agree with is replacing hi with a donkey
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Sept 2, 2015 6:11:29 GMT
Incredible. Stronger squad than we've ever had, broken our transfer record, signed players we could not have dreamed about 2 years ago, and still there's moaning. We have at least 2 premier league players for every position: GK: Butland. Given LB: Pieters, Muniesa, Wilson RB: Johnson, Bardsley, Cameron CB: Shawcross, Muniesa, Woolschied (sp), Cameron, Wilson DM: Whelen, VG, Cameron, Wilson CM: VG, Adam, Ireland, Affaley LM: Arnie, Affaley, Moha AM: Bojan, Ireland, Affaley, Shaq RM: Shaq, Walters, Wingie, Diouf FW: Diouf, Joselu, Wingie, Walters How people can think this wasn't a good window I'll never know. Yes, we all wanted an Nzonzi replacement, but there's not that many out there. Yet we have a front 4, that can rotate, have pace, creativity and are extremely flexible - we will rip teams apart this season once they settle. Then we have a solid spine, which gets stronger when Ryan is back. I've never been more excited to be a Stoke fan. I have no doubts we are a top 10 team. We will strengthen in January and who knows where we can go. I'd love to know what the expectations are from a lot of you. I'm not seeing us as a top 10 outfit to be honest clubs our level have had a better window palace and Swansea especially followed closely by wet sham
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 6:16:28 GMT
Oh why did I go to bed and miss Benji losing his rag?
|
|
|
Post by Bowyer83 on Sept 2, 2015 6:17:57 GMT
Mines a bit of a pane.
|
|