|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 24, 2015 14:02:58 GMT
To clear up the confusion. I created this thread as it seemed that Crooks had no choice but to choose Butland over pantilimon. Butland clearly was the standout keeper of the weekend yet Crooks made it out as if he was fortunate to be included, considering Pantilimon managed to make a few saves and keep his god awful side in the match. Butland was head and shoulders better than Panti. Thats my point, whether people still feel that my irritation regarding Crooks is still not warranted then thats up to them. It doesn't read like that at all, also Pantilimon wasn't far behind, he made some great saves also.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Aug 24, 2015 18:50:22 GMT
Did you read that piece above? Sounds like he retains plenty of affection. Here's a link for you to prove it's real. I've read & heard him be all nostalgic re SCFC more than once,especially re Stan & Waddo. - he's clearly more of a Spurs man for sure. He wasn't complemenatary re SCFC when TP was in charge but he wasn't alone there,including many Stoke fans. He certainly attempted to get rid of his accent (I think he's not entirely suceeded) Peter Coates took elecution lessons & sounds like a posh twat. I think Crooks is not guilty of anything other than being a rubbish interviewer & a bit of a prat As for Bouldy, well he's Mr Arsenal is he not? Got one up on me I've never heard him say anything that suggests he has any affection for the club that made him. Never known Coatesy as a working class potter. My memory of him has always been the businessman. Tight fisted and often appearing to take money out of the club in his first incarnation. Our brilliant generous benefactor in his second. Garth was a very poor working class potter I expect him to remember where he came from. I know for a fact that Bouldy still has a lot of affection for the club. Yes he's been Arsenal for a long time and as he's heavily involved and doesn't come back as often as Denis and some of the other local lads but trust me he remembers where he came from. I do love the local lads keeping ties with the club, hope Wilko will be around once he hangs up his boots.
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Aug 24, 2015 19:15:02 GMT
I've read & heard him be all nostalgic re SCFC more than once,especially re Stan & Waddo. - he's clearly more of a Spurs man for sure. He wasn't complemenatary re SCFC when TP was in charge but he wasn't alone there,including many Stoke fans. He certainly attempted to get rid of his accent (I think he's not entirely suceeded) Peter Coates took elecution lessons & sounds like a posh twat. I think Crooks is not guilty of anything other than being a rubbish interviewer & a bit of a prat As for Bouldy, well he's Mr Arsenal is he not? Got one up on me I've never heard him say anything that suggests he has any affection for the club that made him. Never known Coatesy as a working class potter. My memory of him has always been the businessman. Tight fisted and often appearing to take money out of the club in his first incarnation. Our brilliant generous benefactor in his second. Garth was a very poor working class potter I expect him to remember where he came from. I know for a fact that Bouldy still has a lot of affection for the club. Yes he's been Arsenal for a long time and as he's heavily involved and doesn't come back as often as Denis and some of the other local lads but trust me he remembers where he came from. I do love the local lads keeping ties with the club, hope Wilko will be around once he hangs up his boots. Are you going to at least acknowledge the link and quotes that have been posted twice in this thread showing Garth has great affection and fond memories of Stoke? Or are you just going to continue with unjustified hatred? And you've "never known" Peter Coates as a working class Potter? I can only ask where you've been for the last thirty years...
|
|
|
Post by StokieSC on Aug 24, 2015 19:15:04 GMT
Really can't see what bloke has said/done wrong?
If this had been said by anyone else it would have gone unnoticed.
|
|
|
Post by rednwhite43 on Aug 24, 2015 19:25:56 GMT
Damned if you doo, damned if you dont, boring!
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Aug 24, 2015 19:27:10 GMT
To clear up the confusion. I created this thread as it seemed that Crooks had no choice but to choose Butland over pantilimon. Butland clearly was the standout keeper of the weekend yet Crooks made it out as if he was fortunate to be included, considering Pantilimon managed to make a few saves and keep his god awful side in the match. Butland was head and shoulders better than Panti. Thats my point, whether people still feel that my irritation regarding Crooks is still not warranted then thats up to them. So you know what deluded means?
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Aug 24, 2015 19:31:36 GMT
The deluded bit is Crooks himself. He's a grade A twat who's forgot where he came from. Can't stand the sight or sound of the prick. That pretentious posh voice and fucking bushbaby eyes, fat knacker. Nothing whatsoever to do with Jack Butland. This board normally gets at least 3 threads a season "Garth Crooks........he forgot where he came from.......he's lost his accent and talks posh......he never mentions Stoke City". Admittedly not this early in the season though
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Aug 24, 2015 19:40:04 GMT
I've read & heard him be all nostalgic re SCFC more than once,especially re Stan & Waddo. - he's clearly more of a Spurs man for sure. He wasn't complemenatary re SCFC when TP was in charge but he wasn't alone there,including many Stoke fans. He certainly attempted to get rid of his accent (I think he's not entirely suceeded) Peter Coates took elecution lessons & sounds like a posh twat. I think Crooks is not guilty of anything other than being a rubbish interviewer & a bit of a prat As for Bouldy, well he's Mr Arsenal is he not? Got one up on me I've never heard him say anything that suggests he has any affection for the club that made him. Never known Coatesy as a working class potter. My memory of him has always been the businessman. Tight fisted and often appearing to take money out of the club in his first incarnation. Our brilliant generous benefactor in his second. Garth was a very poor working class potter I expect him to remember where he came from. I know for a fact that Bouldy still has a lot of affection for the club. Yes he's been Arsenal for a long time and as he's heavily involved and doesn't come back as often as Denis and some of the other local lads but trust me he remembers where he came from. I do love the local lads keeping ties with the club, hope Wilko will be around once he hangs up his boots. Coates is a miners son. Crooks is Spurs first Stoke a distant second for sure but he does not warrant hatred.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Aug 24, 2015 19:42:59 GMT
The deluded bit is Crooks himself. He's a grade A twat who's forgot where he came from. Can't stand the sight or sound of the prick. That pretentious posh voice and fucking bushbaby eyes, fat knacker. Nothing whatsoever to do with Jack Butland. August 2015 Seems to have no problem remembering where he came from in this interview with a Spurs website only last week! Before we talk about your Spurs memories, tell us how you broke through at Stoke. Garth Crooks: "I broke through at Stoke courtesy of some fantastic professionals and people who, quite frankly, were ahead of their time. The most important man in football for me was Tony Waddington, arguably the best manager to have ever run Stoke City Football Club. To give young black players a chance to play the professional game during such an early period in our development portrayed a quality few possessed. The greatest goalkeeper I ever saw, and my youth team coach at the time, Gordon Banks, put me through and extraordinary regime. He went to great lengths to produce a work ethic that never existed before and one that has stayed with me all my working life. I would also have to doff my hat to the likes of Denis Smith, my first ever captain, who was a giant in so many ways as far as I was concerned. The likes of Terry Conroy and Jackie Marsh who became lifelong friends and later Adrian Heath and Lee Chapman both of whom went on to win trophies with Everton and Leeds United respectively. All of these individuals played a role in my development in one way or another at Stoke." What do you remember about those early days at the old Victoria Ground? Garth: "The most valuable memory for me playing at the Victoria Ground was making my debut. The transition from being a Stoke supporter to becoming one of their players was just amazing. I spent the first few moments just staring at where I used to stand in the Boothen End. No-one can imagine what a thrill that was for me, not to mention the most extraordinary feeling. To pull on that red and white shirt and run onto the pitch as a first team player was electrifying. I’ve played for four other clubs since but none of them ever quite matched that feeling." Glad you posted that it's quite revealing I've never heard him talk like that. Hope you can see from what he says why I think he should hold our club in the highest regard. Maybe he does he just keeps it well hidden. We don't get too many real Stoke supporters playing for the club when we do you just want them to be like Denis who no matter where his career took him never hid his love for Stoke City, his club. Garth should keep closer ties, don't even think he showed face for the 150th anniversary when boat loads of ex players went round the pitch. Most of them weren't even Stokies.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Aug 24, 2015 19:53:08 GMT
Got one up on me I've never heard him say anything that suggests he has any advection for the club that made him. Never known Coatesy as a working class potter. My memory of him has always been the businessman. Tight fisted and often appearing to take money out of the club in his first incarnation. Our brilliant generous benefactor in his second. Garth was a very poor working class potter I expect him to remember where he came from. I know for a fact that Bouldy still has a lot of affection for the club. Yes he's been Arsenal for a long time and as he's heavily involved and doesn't come back as often as Denis and some of the other local lads but trust me he remembers where he came from. I do love the local lads keeping ties with the club, hope Wilko will be around once he hangs up his boots. Coates is a miners son. Crooks is Spurs first Stoke a distant second for sure but he does not warrant hatred. Peter Coates may well be a miners son but my only experience of him has been as a wealthy businessman director and chairman of Stoke City so I've always thought he was quite posh. Read Garth Crooks own interview posted by spitthedog. He should be a Stokie first and last. The hate is obviously irrational I've admitted as much. I can't understand or like how he's turned out though.
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 25, 2015 7:23:26 GMT
To clear up the confusion. I created this thread as it seemed that Crooks had no choice but to choose Butland over pantilimon. Butland clearly was the standout keeper of the weekend yet Crooks made it out as if he was fortunate to be included, considering Pantilimon managed to make a few saves and keep his god awful side in the match. Butland was head and shoulders better than Panti. Thats my point, whether people still feel that my irritation regarding Crooks is still not warranted then thats up to them. It doesn't read like that at all, also Pantilimon wasn't far behind, he made some great saves also. Ok fair point made. Just saying that I don't have a lot of love for Crooks and it was written like Butland was lucky to get in over Pantilimon.
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 25, 2015 7:25:41 GMT
To clear up the confusion. I created this thread as it seemed that Crooks had no choice but to choose Butland over pantilimon. Butland clearly was the standout keeper of the weekend yet Crooks made it out as if he was fortunate to be included, considering Pantilimon managed to make a few saves and keep his god awful side in the match. Butland was head and shoulders better than Panti. Thats my point, whether people still feel that my irritation regarding Crooks is still not warranted then thats up to them. So you know what deluded means? Funnily enough, yes I do. Whats the relevance of your question?. Shit, kinda wished I hadn't put this up now. Let me phrase so its is clearly understood. Instead of me believing Crooks is deluded, let me change it to I believe he is not in a clear state of mind purely because I felt his written piece suggested that Butland was lucky to get in his team over the cack Sunderland goalkeeper. Me personally, I believed that it wasn't even close regardless of the couple of saves Pantilimon had to make. Butland was on another level Saturday and was head and shoulders above any other keeper……in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Aug 25, 2015 7:33:44 GMT
I think that is too long for a topic header. I could be wrong.
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Aug 25, 2015 8:11:03 GMT
So you know what deluded means? Funnily enough, yes I do. Whats the relevance of your question?. Shit, kinda wished I hadn't put this up now. Let me phrase so its is clearly understood. Instead of me believing Crooks is deluded, let me change it to I believe he is not in a clear state of mind purely because I felt his written piece suggested that Butland was lucky to get in his team over the cack Sunderland goalkeeper. Me personally, I believed that it wasn't even close regardless of the couple of saves Pantilimon had to make. Butland was on another level Saturday and was head and shoulders above any other keeper……in my opinion. So you think someone with a different opinion to you is not in a clear state of mind?
|
|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Aug 25, 2015 8:16:25 GMT
Funnily enough, yes I do. Whats the relevance of your question?. Shit, kinda wished I hadn't put this up now. Let me phrase so its is clearly understood. Instead of me believing Crooks is deluded, let me change it to I believe he is not in a clear state of mind purely because I felt his written piece suggested that Butland was lucky to get in his team over the cack Sunderland goalkeeper. Me personally, I believed that it wasn't even close regardless of the couple of saves Pantilimon had to make. Butland was on another level Saturday and was head and shoulders above any other keeper……in my opinion. So you think someone with a different opinion to you is not in a clear state of mind? You may have to concede that "deluded" and "not in a clear state of mind" are probably excessive given that his opinion is slightly contrary to yours. Even though he places out Goalkeeper in his team of the week. Which in all honestly most people, probably including you, don't really give a shit.
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Aug 25, 2015 9:45:21 GMT
It doesn't read like that at all, also Pantilimon wasn't far behind, he made some great saves also. Ok fair point made. Just saying that I don't have a lot of love for Crooks and it was written like Butland was lucky to get in over Pantilimon. No, not to me, it wasn't - it was written as if Butland deserved to get in the team of the week but that Pantilimon came a close second. I haven't seen all of Pantilimon's game (did you?) only the highlights but it looked to me like he had a great game and I saw nothing to dispute Garth's claim that it was a close thing but that Butland shaded it. For what its worth, Cech also ran Jack Butland close with his display of keeping last night - I suppose you think I am deluded for saying that!
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Aug 25, 2015 9:50:42 GMT
Guy makes his living as pundit which involves speaking and writing his personal opinion. If he had just posted a bare starting best XI then put 'by Garth Crooks, aged 57' at the bottom, its hardly going to be classed as an incisive piece of journalism. Hence he has to proffer opinions on close calls and near misses which is what he did
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 25, 2015 12:02:20 GMT
Funnily enough, yes I do. Whats the relevance of your question?. Shit, kinda wished I hadn't put this up now. Let me phrase so its is clearly understood. Instead of me believing Crooks is deluded, let me change it to I believe he is not in a clear state of mind purely because I felt his written piece suggested that Butland was lucky to get in his team over the cack Sunderland goalkeeper. Me personally, I believed that it wasn't even close regardless of the couple of saves Pantilimon had to make. Butland was on another level Saturday and was head and shoulders above any other keeper……in my opinion. So you think someone with a different opinion to you is not in a clear state of mind? If I'm being honest mate, I'm a bit passed caring!
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 25, 2015 12:04:12 GMT
So you think someone with a different opinion to you is not in a clear state of mind? You may have to concede that "deluded" and "not in a clear state of mind" are probably excessive given that his opinion is slightly contrary to yours. Even though he places out Goalkeeper in his team of the week. Which in all honestly most people, probably including you, don't really give a shit. I don't give a shit, I was just pointing something out which I didn't agree with at the time. Its all trivial. Nobody gives a shit about who Crooks puts into his team of the week. I just thought his write up sounded like Butland was lucky to be included and I thought, in my mind, that it slightly disrespected the unbelievable effort Butland put into that game. Now all of a sudden its become a debate and Ive really moved on from it.
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Aug 25, 2015 13:16:50 GMT
Is Butland the new poster boy
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2015 13:23:23 GMT
You may have to concede that "deluded" and "not in a clear state of mind" are probably excessive given that his opinion is slightly contrary to yours. Even though he places out Goalkeeper in his team of the week. Which in all honestly most people, probably including you, don't really give a shit. I don't give a shit, I was just pointing something out which I didn't agree with at the time. Its all trivial. Nobody gives a shit about who Crooks puts into his team of the week. I just thought his write up sounded like Butland was lucky to be included and I thought, in my mind, that it slightly disrespected the unbelievable effort Butland put into that game. Now all of a sudden its become a debate and Ive really moved on from it. although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up... you ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with that
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 26, 2015 12:20:01 GMT
I don't give a shit, I was just pointing something out which I didn't agree with at the time. Its all trivial. Nobody gives a shit about who Crooks puts into his team of the week. I just thought his write up sounded like Butland was lucky to be included and I thought, in my mind, that it slightly disrespected the unbelievable effort Butland put into that game. Now all of a sudden its become a debate and Ive really moved on from it. although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up... you ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with that You ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with thatCome on mate, was there any need for this in your comment? . Ok let me start with firstly, this comment about my alleged personality as I feel that should be addressed first but no doubt Ill be accused of being touchy or even more overbearingly overly defensive as you made out. Now this statement would actually mean something if you had evidence to base it on but lets be honest here, you don't know me and I don't know you so how did you come to the apparent observation that I'm allegedly over defensive and paranoid?? . No real need for it mate surely?, I was just creating a discussion on something I guess I misread. In this instance I felt like I needed to address and disagree with the slant on my apparent character that you seem to be judging me by given your statement there. Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up…I didn't say he was disrespecting Jack nor did he write such a thing, I said it was my opinion and feeling that Crooks reluctantly gave Butland recognition for the outstanding performance. I felt Crooks undermined Butland's display with the comment he put, obviously others see it different and thats fair enough as thats how they read it. Although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you To be honest mate, Im neither way. I don't come on here looking for everyone to agree with me. This is a place for opinions, although sadly, in some instances having an opinion only brings you abuse and berating from some. Lets get this straight, I quite openly take criticism even if some other cannot. This is not attacking you as a person. Ive seen your replies in the past on here and you seem like a person who isn't afraid to put his point across and fair play to you for that but don't make out that Im overly defensive or paranoid as there is no real need to go down that road surely mate, infact if anything, I'm a little confused as to how you have come to that conclusion based on a thread about Garth Crooks Team of the week, you must be an excellent judge of character from the other side of your computer screen?. Take my reply as you will mate, just felt I needed my say on what you said.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2015 12:54:27 GMT
although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up... you ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with that You ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with thatCome on mate, was there any need for this in your comment? . Ok let me start with firstly, this comment about my alleged personality as I feel that should be addressed first but no doubt Ill be accused of being touchy or even more overbearingly overly defensive as you made out. Now this statement would actually mean something if you had evidence to base it on but lets be honest here, you don't know me and I don't know you so how did you come to the apparent observation that I'm allegedly over defensive and paranoid?? . No real need for it mate surely?, I was just creating a discussion on something I guess I misread. In this instance I felt like I needed to address and disagree with the slant on my apparent character that you seem to be judging me by given your statement there. Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up…I didn't say he was disrespecting Jack nor did he write such a thing, I said it was my opinion and feeling that Crooks reluctantly gave Butland recognition for the outstanding performance. I felt Crooks undermined Butland's display with the comment he put, obviously others see it different and thats fair enough as thats how they read it. Although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you To be honest mate, Im neither way. I don't come on here looking for everyone to agree with me. This is a place for opinions, although sadly, in some instances having an opinion only brings you abuse and berating from some. Lets get this straight, I quite openly take criticism even if some other cannot. This is not attacking you as a person. Ive seen your replies in the past on here and you seem like a person who isn't afraid to put his point across and fair play to you for that but don't make out that Im overly defensive or paranoid as there is no real need to go down that road surely mate, infact if anything, I'm a little confused as to how you have come to that conclusion based on a thread about Garth Crooks Team of the week, you must be an excellent judge of character from the other side of your computer screen?. Take my reply as you will mate, just felt I needed my say on what you said. no problems at all with any of that post mate and, genuinely, i never meant any offence by it. when i said "Overly defensive and paranoid" i meant with reference to Stoke and they way you read the article, it wasn't trying to pass judgment on you as a person. apologies for not making that clearer and, again, there was no offence intended.
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 26, 2015 12:59:35 GMT
You ridiculously overly defensive and paranoid though? Yeah, i'll go with thatCome on mate, was there any need for this in your comment? . Ok let me start with firstly, this comment about my alleged personality as I feel that should be addressed first but no doubt Ill be accused of being touchy or even more overbearingly overly defensive as you made out. Now this statement would actually mean something if you had evidence to base it on but lets be honest here, you don't know me and I don't know you so how did you come to the apparent observation that I'm allegedly over defensive and paranoid?? . No real need for it mate surely?, I was just creating a discussion on something I guess I misread. In this instance I felt like I needed to address and disagree with the slant on my apparent character that you seem to be judging me by given your statement there. Crooks deluded and disrespecting Jack...nothing like that even inferred in his write up…I didn't say he was disrespecting Jack nor did he write such a thing, I said it was my opinion and feeling that Crooks reluctantly gave Butland recognition for the outstanding performance. I felt Crooks undermined Butland's display with the comment he put, obviously others see it different and thats fair enough as thats how they read it. Although i suspect you wouldn't have moved on and would still be all over it like a rash if everyone had agreed with you To be honest mate, Im neither way. I don't come on here looking for everyone to agree with me. This is a place for opinions, although sadly, in some instances having an opinion only brings you abuse and berating from some. Lets get this straight, I quite openly take criticism even if some other cannot. This is not attacking you as a person. Ive seen your replies in the past on here and you seem like a person who isn't afraid to put his point across and fair play to you for that but don't make out that Im overly defensive or paranoid as there is no real need to go down that road surely mate, infact if anything, I'm a little confused as to how you have come to that conclusion based on a thread about Garth Crooks Team of the week, you must be an excellent judge of character from the other side of your computer screen?. Take my reply as you will mate, just felt I needed my say on what you said. no problems at all with any of that post mate and, genuinely, i never meant any offence by it. when i said "Overly defensive and paranoid" i meant with reference to Stoke and they way you read the article, it wasn't trying to pass judgment on you as a person. apologies for not making that clearer and, again, there was no offence intended. Apologies on my part as well mate as I misread your post.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Aug 27, 2015 0:13:29 GMT
I must admit……I like the way this thread has ended Hope no-one comes along and spoils it all now
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Aug 27, 2015 0:52:58 GMT
You may have to concede that "deluded" and "not in a clear state of mind" are probably excessive given that his opinion is slightly contrary to yours. Even though he places out Goalkeeper in his team of the week. Which in all honestly most people, probably including you, don't really give a shit. I don't give a shit, I was just pointing something out which I didn't agree with at the time. Its all trivial. Nobody gives a shit about who Crooks puts into his team of the week. I just thought his write up sounded like Butland was lucky to be included and I thought, in my mind, that it slightly disrespected the unbelievable effort Butland put into that game. Now all of a sudden its become a debate and Ive really moved on from it. erm. What did you expect? That everyone would agree with you? Ain't goin to happen mate Boards are intended for debate. Especially if you read something into what GC wrote that isnt there.
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 27, 2015 12:17:44 GMT
I don't give a shit, I was just pointing something out which I didn't agree with at the time. Its all trivial. Nobody gives a shit about who Crooks puts into his team of the week. I just thought his write up sounded like Butland was lucky to be included and I thought, in my mind, that it slightly disrespected the unbelievable effort Butland put into that game. Now all of a sudden its become a debate and Ive really moved on from it. erm. What did you expect? That everyone would agree with you? Ain't goin to happen mate Boards are intended for debate. Especially if you read something into what GC wrote that isnt there. I didn't expect anything!! I didn't expect people to agree with me! Can we move on now?, I never for one minute believed or expected everyone to agree with what I said, I was just raising a point about how I didn't agree with how he had written his piece thats all. Im not sure why Im even being asked this now. It was a piece of an article I didn't agree with in my opinion….
|
|
|
Post by SamB_SCFC on Aug 27, 2015 12:28:38 GMT
So a guy with a hard impoverished background gets an opportunity to make a better life for himself and chooses to take it and live in a nicer area of the country and live a more privileged life than his poor upbringing. Can't see the problem myself? If I got a decent job and more money I'd move on and give myself and my kids a better life than I've had so far. Some people just seem to have an in built resentment of people better off than them and seem to think that if you've come from the bottom you somehow owe something to the area you've come from.
Ok maybe the fake posh accent is a bit much but out own Peter Coates has one too. Like Coates he clearly felt he needed it to get on in life and to be fair to him it seems to have worked with him having a successful broadcasting career over a number of years.
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Aug 27, 2015 14:00:55 GMT
I like Garth, the best way to end this thread is to say he is a nice guy but also add '4-2-1-3-1' '4-2-1-3-1' '4-2-1-3-1' '4-2-1-3-1' and
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Aug 27, 2015 19:42:05 GMT
erm. What did you expect? That everyone would agree with you? Ain't goin to happen mate Boards are intended for debate. Especially if you read something into what GC wrote that isnt there. I didn't expect anything!! I didn't expect people to agree with me! Can we move on now?, I never for one minute believed or expected everyone to agree with what I said, I was just raising a point about how I didn't agree with how he had written his piece thats all. Im not sure why Im even being asked this now. It was a piece of an article I didn't agree with in my opinion…. I think you're deluded.
|
|