|
|
Post by stokiemart83 on Jul 7, 2015 20:36:24 GMT
both in there hayday, which would you personally say was better? for me it has to be stuller!  8-|think id say STEINOOOOO!!!! but only just!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by GrahamHyde on Jul 7, 2015 20:38:45 GMT
I am too young to have seen Stein, but Fuller would take some beating.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonnybravo on Jul 7, 2015 20:40:07 GMT
Sorry but stein at his best was ten times better than Fuller was,stein did it every week, Ricardo every 5 or 6 weeks
|
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jul 7, 2015 20:40:29 GMT
Steino - that man was magic. He scored goals others could only dream of
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:41:36 GMT
Stein. Every day of the week.
|
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jul 7, 2015 20:41:55 GMT
Sorry but stein at his best was ten times better than Fuller was,stein did it every week, Ricardo every 5 or 6 weeks I'd go stein as well but that's bollocks. Ric carried our forward threat, every week, for 4 seasons...5 if you include his 1st year with us |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:43:06 GMT
Stein - but we have had better than Stein.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:43:09 GMT
Mark Stein without a shadow of doubt . The best player we have had since Jimmy Greenhoff . He would walk into this current team and score you 20 goals no problem .
Absolute class ...Fantastic .
|
|
|
|
Post by Roger Everyone on Jul 7, 2015 20:43:53 GMT
It has to be Stein, but fuller did a job for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemark on Jul 7, 2015 20:44:13 GMT
Sorry but stein at his best was ten times better than Fuller was,stein did it every week, Ricardo every 5 or 6 weeks What bollocks |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:44:47 GMT
Steino.
|
|
|
|
Post by boppa74 on Jul 7, 2015 20:46:43 GMT
Think ive answered this one before on here. Stein for me. Everytime the ball was at his feet you just expected the net to bulge within seconds, and mostly it did!
Fuller the more skillful of the 2 but in terms of hitting the net, definitely Stein for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:47:57 GMT
Totally different players. Stein was a clinical marksman. He could be anonymous for 89 minutes but pop up with a goal or two. He played on the shoulder and rarely missed. Ric could play deeper, pick the ball up and easily beat 3 men. Ric was at his best when by the touch line with apparently nowhere to go then just jink inside 2 men and lay it on a plate. Both fantastic players who we have been lucky to have.
|
|
|
|
Post by kerouac on Jul 7, 2015 20:50:25 GMT
Stein,but don't forget this wasn't in the premier league...for us at least.I personally think they were very different players,Stein was an out and out goal machine and Fuller was....well he was Ricky Fuller!
|
|
|
|
Post by boppa74 on Jul 7, 2015 20:51:05 GMT
Totally different players. Stein was a clinical marksman. He could be anonymous for 89 minutes but pop up with a goal or two. He played in the shoulder and rarely missed. Ric could play deeper, pick the ball up and easily beat 3 men. Ric was at his best when by the touch line with apparently nowhere to go then just junk inside 2 men and lay it on a plate. Both fantastic players who we have been lucky to have. I guess this is what i was trying to say. |
|
|
|
Post by kerouac on Jul 7, 2015 20:51:16 GMT
Totally different players. Stein was a clinical marksman. He could be anonymous for 89 minutes but pop up with a goal or two. He played in the shoulder and rarely missed. Ric could play deeper, pick the ball up and easily beat 3 men. Ric was at his best when by the touch line with apparently nowhere to go then just junk inside 2 men and lay it on a plate. Both fantastic players who we have been lucky to have. Beat me to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:51:20 GMT
Fuller was far more consistent than some would have you believe. It was a privilege to watch him play most of the time, and even with his supposedly glass knees, I'm amazed that he never played for a bigger club. But Fuller or Stein? It's the Golden One every time for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by MilanStokie on Jul 7, 2015 20:52:36 GMT
I think a tad unfair to compare the 2.
The majority of the 2's career at Stoke were not spent at the same level. Had Fuller spent more of his time with us in the Champ, I have no doubt he would have doubled his scoring record.
Fuller was magic in the top league. I saw some of Stein but wasn't a regular at the Vic until 1995/1996 so only caught his last spell, so for me Fuller wins by default only.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tosh on Jul 7, 2015 20:53:23 GMT
Stein! No contest. Always knew what you were going to get on a Saturday from Stenio, hit and miss with ric.
Plus Stenio was the first poster I had on my wall, (I was 19!)
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 20:53:36 GMT
Steino for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jul 7, 2015 20:54:06 GMT
Totally different players.
Be a fantastic pair.
Stein for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Jul 7, 2015 20:54:25 GMT
There's only one Steino.
|
|
|
|
Post by j3st3r on Jul 7, 2015 21:00:07 GMT
Irrespective of which people prefer for whatever reason.. they share one common trait that I've rarely seen in Stoke players... when ever they got the ball at their feet... you could feel a palpable rise in collective anticipation around the ground that something special could be about to happen. For that alone they are and always will be Stoke City legends...
|
|
|
|
Post by Gob Bluth on Jul 7, 2015 21:01:36 GMT
I'm going to stand the other side of the line and go for Fuller. Stein's pace and ability to play off the shoulder was great but the way Fuller used his body to get between the defender and the ball was brilliant. There's no doubting that Stein was more prolific and he scored well for Chelsea which could negate the Premier League vs lower league argument but Rick's goals and sheer pigheadedness was bloody brilliant to watch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 21:02:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Onneravineet on Jul 7, 2015 21:02:36 GMT
Stein.
Now Stein playing up top with Ric...hmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jul 7, 2015 21:03:38 GMT
Stein - but we have had better than Stein. In the last 38 years? Bojan,Chamberlain. Any others clearly better? |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jul 7, 2015 21:04:36 GMT
Not a patch on either. And he was great. |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jul 7, 2015 21:04:52 GMT
1 Chapman
2 Fuller
3 BT
4 Sheron
5 Stein
Of course Mama eclipsed them all, but he wasn't a striker! (winky thingy)
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 21:05:35 GMT
Not a patch on either. And he was great. To me he was |
|
8-|think id say STEINOOOOO!!!! but only just!!!!
