|
Post by salopstick on Feb 24, 2016 15:09:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mumf on Feb 24, 2016 15:13:24 GMT
There seems to be an endless supply of sex offenders in this area , but rather than name them or their nationality I would prefer posters to use their imagination before they open the link .
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Feb 24, 2016 15:27:46 GMT
There seems to be an endless supply of sex offenders in this area , but rather than name them or their nationality I would prefer posters to use their imagination before they open the link . Not sure what your point is , it is what it is
|
|
|
Post by themistocles on Feb 24, 2016 15:29:49 GMT
There seems to be an endless supply of sex offenders in this area , but rather than name them or their nationality I would prefer posters to use their imagination before they open the link . Yeah but although the offenders were all of one race and the victims were all of another it's wasn't a racism incident.. What the liberals would like you to believe..
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Feb 24, 2016 15:30:00 GMT
There seems to be an endless supply of sex offenders in this area , but rather than name them or their nationality I would prefer posters to use their imagination before they open the link . Their nationality actually doesn't matter. They should have been locked up long ago. Their nationality only matters to the PC of this world, who are desperately afraid to be seen as racist.
|
|
|
Post by mumf on Feb 24, 2016 16:17:28 GMT
There seems to be an endless supply of sex offenders in this area , but rather than name them or their nationality I would prefer posters to use their imagination before they open the link . Their nationality actually doesn't matter. They should have been locked up long ago. Their nationality only matters to the PC of this world, who are desperately afraid to be seen as racist. Their nationality does matter . This precise point needs to be made . It's not my opinion , it's the opinion of several agencies and two different Police forces . It's has been stated quite clearly that there is an element of the Pakistani community who are / have deliberately targeted vulnerable Young British white females . These are racist attacks .
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Feb 24, 2016 17:17:17 GMT
Their nationality actually doesn't matter. They should have been locked up long ago. Their nationality only matters to the PC of this world, who are desperately afraid to be seen as racist. Their nationality does matter . This precise point needs to be made . It's not my opinion , it's the opinion of several agencies and two different Police forces . It's has been stated quite clearly that there is an element of the Pakistani community who are / have deliberately targeted vulnerable Young British white females . These are racist attacks . Yes, but as I said the agencies are too afraid of being branded racist. Their nationality matters to them.
|
|
|
Post by dexta on Feb 24, 2016 20:06:54 GMT
Ffs people need to get a grip if gangs of white men abused Asian girls there would be uproar in this country...end of the day the Pakistani grooming gangs see white girls as easy meat...gone to soft in this country that means the courts and us as a nation...
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Feb 25, 2016 16:55:54 GMT
Ffs people need to get a grip if gangs of white men abused Asian girls there would be uproar in this country...end of the day the Pakistani grooming gangs see white girls as easy meat...gone to soft in this country that means the courts and us as a nation... I agree, but the reason they're getting away with it is not because it's Pakistani men on white girls, it's because people are afraid of being labelled racist. The reality is, if this situation had been dealt with 25 years ago, when it first started, the argument that 'non-whites' are getting special treatment wouldn't hold any water. There nationality doesn't matter, what they're doing is horribly wrong. The real question is why they're getting away with it, and the answer is institutionalized racism. The police are so scared to be branded racist, and incorrectly punished when they put their foot down, they end up pandering and fucking up the whole situation completely, as happened in Rotherham. These gangs will only go away when ALL people are treated equally. Unfortunately, it's become a theme that sentencing seems to depend on skill colour, nationality and gender.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 25, 2016 18:57:01 GMT
Ffs people need to get a grip if gangs of white men abused Asian girls there would be uproar in this country...end of the day the Pakistani grooming gangs see white girls as easy meat...gone to soft in this country that means the courts and us as a nation... I agree, but the reason they're getting away with it is not because it's Pakistani men on white girls, it's because people are afraid of being labelled racist. The reality is, if this situation had been dealt with 25 years ago, when it first started, the argument that 'non-whites' are getting special treatment wouldn't hold any water. There nationality doesn't matter, what they're doing is horribly wrong. The real question is why they're getting away with it, and the answer is institutionalized racism. The police are so scared to be branded racist, and incorrectly punished when they put their foot down, they end up pandering and fucking up the whole situation completely, as happened in Rotherham. These gangs will only go away when ALL people are treated equally. Unfortunately, it's become a theme that sentencing seems to depend on skill colour, nationality and gender. where are all the apologist posters, very quiet on this subject especially ALF they have run out of pathetic excuses for what is actual racism especially it appears on behalf of the police service, it does feel as though we are been discriminated against as white people in our own country of birth by the people who are paid to protect the public from such filthy perverts, Rotherham is a disgrace and a stain on the authorities who covered this up, failed to act on information received on sexual assaults, failed to bring these Muslim scum bags to justice within a reasonable period of time, failed the girls their parents/family and failed society they should all be brought to book and sacked then put on trail as accessories to these crimes.
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Feb 25, 2016 19:51:05 GMT
I agree, but the reason they're getting away with it is not because it's Pakistani men on white girls, it's because people are afraid of being labelled racist. The reality is, if this situation had been dealt with 25 years ago, when it first started, the argument that 'non-whites' are getting special treatment wouldn't hold any water. There nationality doesn't matter, what they're doing is horribly wrong. The real question is why they're getting away with it, and the answer is institutionalized racism. The police are so scared to be branded racist, and incorrectly punished when they put their foot down, they end up pandering and fucking up the whole situation completely, as happened in Rotherham. These gangs will only go away when ALL people are treated equally. Unfortunately, it's become a theme that sentencing seems to depend on skill colour, nationality and gender. where are all the apologist posters, very quiet on this subject especially ALF they have run out of pathetic excuses for what is actual racism especially it appears on behalf of the police service, it does feel as though we are been discriminated against as white people in our own country of birth by the people who are paid to protect the public from such filthy perverts, Rotherham is a disgrace and a stain on the authorities who covered this up, failed to act on information received on sexual assaults, failed to bring these Muslim scum bags to justice within a reasonable period of time, failed the girls their parents/family and failed society they should all be brought to book and sacked then put on trail as accessories to these crimes. You could argue the white paedophiles in the Catholic church and celebrity circles were treated EXACTLY the same as the Rotherham scumbags. Unfortunately for the victims that equality was to let all of them do what they wanted for years.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 25, 2016 20:09:25 GMT
where are all the apologist posters, very quiet on this subject especially ALF they have run out of pathetic excuses for what is actual racism especially it appears on behalf of the police service, it does feel as though we are been discriminated against as white people in our own country of birth by the people who are paid to protect the public from such filthy perverts, Rotherham is a disgrace and a stain on the authorities who covered this up, failed to act on information received on sexual assaults, failed to bring these Muslim scum bags to justice within a reasonable period of time, failed the girls their parents/family and failed society they should all be brought to book and sacked then put on trail as accessories to these crimes. You could argue the white paedophiles in the Catholic church and celebrity circles were treated EXACTLY the same as the Rotherham scumbags. Unfortunately for the victims that equality was to let all of them do what they wanted for years. All paedophiles are scum, the difference between the two scenarios is that one was carried generally by individual sexual predators, the other was carried out by gangs of organised sexual predators on the streets of our country and know about in the local communities as a whole, I agree with you about the victims in all paedophile cases, I also think that there will be many more of these cases due to how the male muslim community view young white females.
|
|
|
Post by mumf on Feb 25, 2016 21:10:13 GMT
All paedophiles are scum, the difference between the two scenarios is that one was carried generally by individual sexual predators, the other was carried out by gangs of organised sexual predators on the streets of our country and know about in the local communities as a whole, I agree with you about the victims in all paedophile cases, I also think that there will be many more of these cases due to how the male muslim community view young white females. Agree with your opening comment and your final one Carps, but do you really think that some of the Catholic Church's vile acts weren't often organised and known of in their own communities also? If I may answer your point .....yes no doubt that they were organised in some instances , but again that's where the similarity ends . The attacks in Rotherham were both racial and on a far bigger scale which in itself exposes profound social problems away from sexual depravity . We are talking about integration issues and inter racial relations . The lowest common denominator being illegal sexual gratification by large numbers of Pakistani and Bangladeshi males . What isn't quite clear is how many there are still out there yet to be discovered. Sadly , this 'problem' is only going to get worse as today immigration net total figure for the last year showed 323,000 and will undoubtedly cause extra pressures on our health , welfare and social services .
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Feb 25, 2016 21:15:37 GMT
where are all the apologist posters, very quiet on this subject especially ALF they have run out of pathetic excuses for what is actual racism especially it appears on behalf of the police service, it does feel as though we are been discriminated against as white people in our own country of birth by the people who are paid to protect the public from such filthy perverts, Rotherham is a disgrace and a stain on the authorities who covered this up, failed to act on information received on sexual assaults, failed to bring these Muslim scum bags to justice within a reasonable period of time, failed the girls their parents/family and failed society they should all be brought to book and sacked then put on trail as accessories to these crimes. You could argue the white paedophiles in the Catholic church and celebrity circles were treated EXACTLY the same as the Rotherham scumbags. Unfortunately for the victims that equality was to let all of them do what they wanted for years. But the Catholic priests and the 'celebs' weren't identifying their targets on the basis of race were they? The preyed on the innocent and vulnerable. The Asian gangs seem to have been specifically targeting vulnerable white girls. The investigations into the Rotherham, Rochdale, etc. gangs have shown that the fear of being labelled a racist severely hindered the process of process of bringing the evil gangs to justice.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Feb 25, 2016 22:33:24 GMT
Agree with your opening comment and your final one Carps, but do you really think that some of the Catholic Church's vile acts weren't often organised and known of in their own communities also? If I may answer your point .....yes no doubt that they were organised in some instances , but again that's where the similarity ends . The attacks in Rotherham were both racial and on a far bigger scale which in itself exposes profound social problems away from sexual depravity . We are talking about integration issues and inter racial relations . The lowest common denominator being illegal sexual gratification by large numbers of Pakistani and Bangladeshi males . What isn't quite clear is how many there are still out there yet to be discovered. Sadly , this 'problem' is only going to get worse as today immigration net total figure for the last year showed 323,000 and will undoubtedly cause extra pressures on our health , welfare and social services . And we should not forget, that figure is NET,in the 12 months to September 2015 617,000 people arrived in the UK. This is up 0.3 per cent on the previous year.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 25, 2016 22:54:08 GMT
I agree, but the reason they're getting away with it is not because it's Pakistani men on white girls, it's because people are afraid of being labelled racist. The reality is, if this situation had been dealt with 25 years ago, when it first started, the argument that 'non-whites' are getting special treatment wouldn't hold any water. There nationality doesn't matter, what they're doing is horribly wrong. The real question is why they're getting away with it, and the answer is institutionalized racism. The police are so scared to be branded racist, and incorrectly punished when they put their foot down, they end up pandering and fucking up the whole situation completely, as happened in Rotherham. These gangs will only go away when ALL people are treated equally. Unfortunately, it's become a theme that sentencing seems to depend on skill colour, nationality and gender. where are all the apologist posters, very quiet on this subject especially ALF they have run out of pathetic excuses for what is actual racism especially it appears on behalf of the police service, it does feel as though we are been discriminated against as white people in our own country of birth by the people who are paid to protect the public from such filthy perverts, Rotherham is a disgrace and a stain on the authorities who covered this up, failed to act on information received on sexual assaults, failed to bring these Muslim scum bags to justice within a reasonable period of time, failed the girls their parents/family and failed society they should all be brought to book and sacked then put on trail as accessories to these crimes. Just to clarify something while you foam at the mouth over race and religion. I have never been an apologist for the crimes committed by these evil tossers, because that is what they are. I'd ask for an apology but know I'm wasting my time with you.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 25, 2016 23:05:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Feb 26, 2016 1:42:37 GMT
You could argue the white paedophiles in the Catholic church and celebrity circles were treated EXACTLY the same as the Rotherham scumbags. Unfortunately for the victims that equality was to let all of them do what they wanted for years. But the Catholic priests and the 'celebs' weren't identifying their targets on the basis of race were they? The preyed on the innocent and vulnerable. The Asian gangs seem to have been specifically targeting vulnerable white girls. The investigations into the Rotherham, Rochdale, etc. gangs have shown that the fear of being labelled a racist severely hindered the process of process of bringing the evil gangs to justice. The investigations into Saville were hindered because of the aura of fame that surrounded him. The Roman Catholic priests were able to get away with their wicked crimes because the police believed the people they were investigating were above the law. I see direct similarities between all the cases mentioned. There were hoardes of people working in groups for many years to abuse hundreds of children. The fact this was allowed to happen was because some tosspots decided it would be too offensive to question the sex offenders. In this case I don't believe the Rotherham cunts were treated differently than other paedophile rings, in that they were allowed to roam free for years because some negligent authority decided it would be too much trouble to investigate them.
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Feb 26, 2016 10:39:43 GMT
But the Catholic priests and the 'celebs' weren't identifying their targets on the basis of race were they? The preyed on the innocent and vulnerable. The Asian gangs seem to have been specifically targeting vulnerable white girls. The investigations into the Rotherham, Rochdale, etc. gangs have shown that the fear of being labelled a racist severely hindered the process of process of bringing the evil gangs to justice. The investigations into Saville were hindered because of the aura of fame that surrounded him. The Roman Catholic priests were able to get away with their wicked crimes because the police believed the people they were investigating were above the law. I see direct similarities between all the cases mentioned. There were hoardes of people working in groups for many years to abuse hundreds of children. The fact this was allowed to happen was because some tosspots decided it would be too offensive to question the sex offenders. In this case I don't believe the Rotherham cunts were treated differently than other paedophile rings, in that they were allowed to roam free for years because some negligent authority decided it would be too much trouble to investigate them. So you don't think that there was any racial element to how these gangs operated or how they managed to avoid justice for so long?
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 26, 2016 14:33:35 GMT
But the Catholic priests and the 'celebs' weren't identifying their targets on the basis of race were they? The preyed on the innocent and vulnerable. The Asian gangs seem to have been specifically targeting vulnerable white girls. The investigations into the Rotherham, Rochdale, etc. gangs have shown that the fear of being labelled a racist severely hindered the process of process of bringing the evil gangs to justice. The investigations into Saville were hindered because of the aura of fame that surrounded him. The Roman Catholic priests were able to get away with their wicked crimes because the police believed the people they were investigating were above the law. I see direct similarities between all the cases mentioned. There were hoardes of people working in groups for many years to abuse hundreds of children. The fact this was allowed to happen was because some tosspots decided it would be too offensive to question the sex offenders. In this case I don't believe the Rotherham cunts were treated differently than other paedophile rings, in that they were allowed to roam free for years because some negligent authority decided it would be too much trouble to investigate them. Most of the crimes committed by people like Saville and the catholic Church were historical crimes vile as they were, the cases in Rotherham etc were recent very recent in comparison also the numbers involved are vastly different as we know, the recent ones were also carried out by Muslims who have targeted white Christian minors only, why has it taken so long for these perverts to be bought to justice , they were identified years ago I wonder how many of these depraved sick bastards have left this country to avoid prosecution in the time it has taken us to take action, we are frankly a joke pandering to any minority faction that feels like rocking up here.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2016 14:41:20 GMT
It's not the nationality of these men that is significant (people will point out that most of them are British born anyway but that's another debate) what is completely relevant and isn't mentioned by most of the media and most of the people in power, whose words have most influence, is the culture of these men impacting their behaviour.
If you take a child from a sexually repressed culture and indoctrinate them to revere a man who slaughtered non-muslim men and sexually enslaved non-muslim women, married and fucked pre-pubescent girls and who wills his followers to do the same in the name of allah then it's no great mystery why you have a not at all insignificant number of muslims lining up to commit terrorist atrocities and sexual atrocities.
This is the brutal truth. Islam is not and never will be compatible with our society. You can point out that the majority of muslims are decent people but I'll point out that the majority of those decent people would still desire for Britain to eventually become an islamic nation, and consciously or unconsciously they are working towards that eventual goal just by following the koran and bringing more muslim children into the world.
I know this won't sit well with some people but I very much doubt those same outraged people possess the ability to seriously refute what I am saying.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 26, 2016 16:42:40 GMT
It's not the nationality of these men that is significant (people will point out that most of them are British born anyway but that's another debate) what is completely relevant and isn't mentioned by most of the media and most of the people in power, whose words have most influence, is the culture of these men impacting their behaviour. If you take a child from a sexually repressed culture and indoctrinate them to revere a man who slaughtered non-muslim men and sexually enslaved non-muslim women, married and fucked pre-pubescent girls and who wills his followers to do the same in the name of allah then it's no great mystery why you have a not at all insignificant number of muslims lining up to commit terrorist atrocities and sexual atrocities. This is the brutal truth. Islam is not and never will be compatible with our society. You can point out that the majority of muslims are decent people but I'll point out that the majority of those decent people would still desire for Britain to eventually become an islamic nation, and consciously or unconsciously they are working towards that eventual goal just by following the koran and bringing more muslim children into the world. I know this won't sit well with some people but I very much doubt those same outraged people possess the ability to seriously refute what I am saying. Good post that. Other religious and ethnic groups (black, Oriental, Indian, Jewish etc) have fitted into Western society relatively seamlessly but Islam does seem to be quite an intolerant and strict religion (eg women are second class) that it is bound to be at odds with modern Western values.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 26, 2016 18:58:08 GMT
Good post that. Other religious and ethnic groups (black, Oriental, Indian, Jewish etc) have fitted into Western society relatively seamlessly but Islam does seem to be quite an intolerant and strict religion (eg women are second class) that it is bound to be at odds with modern Western values. "Oriental" referes to THINGS from the Orient, such as food, rugs, souvenirs etc.....material things. Therefore when you refer to humans as "Oriental" you are referring to them as an object with no soul or substance , a bit like a VOID if you like. This is why the term is considered offensive and a racial slur in many different societies and cultures. Do Orientals not come from the orient then ? however they have in the most part integrated well into other society's, others have not and prefer to live in communities within the wider community that can not be healthy or conducive within a peaceful tolerant society it is they who need to be more tolerant, they need to respect the rules etc. of the host country if not they need removing for society's sake.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 26, 2016 19:08:40 GMT
It's not the nationality of these men that is significant (people will point out that most of them are British born anyway but that's another debate) what is completely relevant and isn't mentioned by most of the media and most of the people in power, whose words have most influence, is the culture of these men impacting their behaviour. If you take a child from a sexually repressed culture and indoctrinate them to revere a man who slaughtered non-muslim men and sexually enslaved non-muslim women, married and fucked pre-pubescent girls and who wills his followers to do the same in the name of allah then it's no great mystery why you have a not at all insignificant number of muslims lining up to commit terrorist atrocities and sexual atrocities. This is the brutal truth. Islam is not and never will be compatible with our society. You can point out that the majority of muslims are decent people but I'll point out that the majority of those decent people would still desire for Britain to eventually become an islamic nation, and consciously or unconsciously they are working towards that eventual goal just by following the koran and bringing more muslim children into the world. I know this won't sit well with some people but I very much doubt those same outraged people possess the ability to seriously refute what I am saying. Sums up the situation we find ourselves in perfectly, there will be some on this board who will try to refute what you have posted, they will no doubt label you a racist or Nazi that is the only form of defence they have left in their rapidly depleting armoury, that and a few meaningless memes, there is no desire from certain communities to integrate into our society.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 26, 2016 19:32:41 GMT
Good post that. Other religious and ethnic groups (black, Oriental, Indian, Jewish etc) have fitted into Western society relatively seamlessly but Islam does seem to be quite an intolerant and strict religion (eg women are second class) that it is bound to be at odds with modern Western values. "Oriental" referes to THINGS from the Orient, such as food, rugs, souvenirs etc.....material things. Therefore when you refer to humans as "Oriental" you are referring to them as an object with no soul or substance , a bit like a VOID if you like. This is why the term is considered offensive and a racial slur in many different societies and cultures. Thanks for the quote from Urban Dictionary or Wikipedia Cliff, but I used the word Oriental to differentiate them from Indians (who I also covered in my previous post and who also fall under the umbrella of 'Asian'). I also felt it saved typing a list of nationalities from that part of the world and was a bit more succinct than putting 'people from East and South-East Asia'. So apologies to anyone from Eastern Asia who may stumble upon this thread and think I've mistaken your people for a rug or fast-food establishment, all I'll say is I hope the roadsigns are bilingual in your part of the world.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 26, 2016 21:49:01 GMT
Thanks for the quote from Urban Dictionary or Wikipedia Cliff, but I used the word Oriental to differentiate them from Indians (who I also covered in my previous post and who also fall under the umbrella of 'Asian'). I also felt it saved typing a list of nationalities from that part of the world and was a bit more succinct than putting 'people from East and South-East Asia'. So apologies to anyone from Eastern Asia who may stumble upon this thread and think I've mistaken your people for a rug or fast-food establishment, all I'll say is I hope the roadsigns are bilingual in your part of the world. Stop making an even bigger arse of yourself by calling me Cliff Rumbled again Mr John Cliff, how is Thailand these days
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 26, 2016 22:27:29 GMT
Thanks for the quote from Urban Dictionary or Wikipedia Cliff, but I used the word Oriental to differentiate them from Indians (who I also covered in my previous post and who also fall under the umbrella of 'Asian'). I also felt it saved typing a list of nationalities from that part of the world and was a bit more succinct than putting 'people from East and South-East Asia'. So apologies to anyone from Eastern Asia who may stumble upon this thread and think I've mistaken your people for a rug or fast-food establishment, all I'll say is I hope the roadsigns are bilingual in your part of the world. Stop making an even bigger arse of yourself by calling me Cliff Only person looking like a throbber on here is you, Cliff. Anyway, what's wrong with Cliff? It's a nice name. Better than Baloney, which in the dictionary means foolishness and nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 26, 2016 22:40:55 GMT
Stop making an even bigger arse of yourself by calling me Cliff Only person looking like a throbber on here is you, Cliff. Anyway, what's wrong with Cliff? It's a nice name. Better than Baloney, which in the dictionary means foolishness and nonsense. Baloney suitable name that suits the nut job perfectly, you have to feel pity for him really living proof that care in the community has failed this weirdo, I thank god that I only have to suffer dyslexia.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2016 23:32:59 GMT
Stop making an even bigger arse of yourself by calling me Cliff Only person looking like a throbber on here is you, Cliff. Anyway, what's wrong with Cliff? It's a nice name. Better than Baloney, which in the dictionary means foolishness and nonsense. I'm not one to interfere in these things ....but you have it wrong on this one ....Tony is not ************** .
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Feb 26, 2016 23:44:49 GMT
Only person looking like a throbber on here is you, Cliff. Anyway, what's wrong with Cliff? It's a nice name. Better than Baloney, which in the dictionary means foolishness and nonsense. I'm not one to interfere in these things ....but you have it wrong on this one ....Tony is not ************** . So my theory is that Bisph disappeared for a while not long so long ago...so maybe he was kidnapped by **************, and now's ************** is Bisph, and so ************** is telling us that Tony - ************** is not **************. Anyway, that's my theory - just need to come up with some suitably obscure un-Googleble question on cricket to see if it really is Bisph.
|
|