|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 19:23:00 GMT
Is 'legalised revenge' via execution the right thing to do?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 19:29:46 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice .
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 26, 2015 19:36:18 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . Maybe they should behead the bastard in public and post the video on the internet, seems to work for some brutal inhuman filth in Syria can't beat a bit of publicity. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 19:43:56 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . Maybe they should behead the bastard in public and post the video on the internet, seems to work for some brutal inhuman filth in Syria can't beat a bit of publicity. Perhaps if Sharia law was practised over here where crimes were punished in a more brutal way , then it would make them 'feel at home' more ....integration in action . |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 19:46:08 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . Maybe they should behead the bastard in public and post the video on the internet, seems to work for some brutal inhuman filth in Syria can't beat a bit of publicity. Lowering ourselves to the level of others is not the best way to go about things. We have to show that we are civilised and humane. |
|
|
|
Post by boothenboy75 on May 26, 2015 19:50:08 GMT
Is 'legalised revenge' via execution the right thing to do? They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 19:52:46 GMT
Maybe they should behead the bastard in public and post the video on the internet, seems to work for some brutal inhuman filth in Syria can't beat a bit of publicity. Lowering ourselves to the level of others is not the best way to go about things. We have to show that we are civilised and humane. No ....wars are won by who is most successful at killing and in larger volumes . You don't win wars by holding hands and preaching tolerance . It doesn't work . The more that's killed the better . |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 19:57:42 GMT
Is 'legalised revenge' via execution the right thing to do? They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? I'm not sure that capital punishment would stop people though. The Boston Bomber was probably quite aware he would face the death penalty if caught and yet he still chose to go ahead and commit the atrocity. If we want to lead by example and prove that we're better than others, shouldn't we do it by actually being better rather than killing someone who has killed others? |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 19:58:52 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . There's no chance he would have been released though is there? He couldn't possibly do it again |
|
|
|
Post by boothenboy75 on May 26, 2015 20:01:04 GMT
They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? I'm not sure that capital punishment would stop people though. The Boston Bomber was probably quite aware he would face the death penalty if caught and yet he still chose to go ahead and commit the atrocity. If we want to lead by example and prove that we're better than others, shouldn't we do it by actually being better rather than killing someone who has killed others? It seems that the majority of the British public still favour capital punishment. yougov.co.uk/news/2014/08/13/capital-punishment-50-years-favoured/You'd never have guessed given the coverage in the media and of course the comments of our elected representatives. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 20:01:33 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . There's no chance he would have been released though is there? He couldn't possibly do it again One bullet or syringe costs Bugger all..... A life in prison costs hundreds of thousands and in six months time you won't even remember his name . You do the maths . |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 20:05:47 GMT
What about the people that are wrongly convicted?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 20:13:28 GMT
What about the people that are wrongly convicted? What about the medics who die in action fighting to save life ? What about the nurses and doctors and ground staff . ? What about the innocent civilians ? Modern forensics don't get many if any wrong convictions in 2015 . |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 20:30:16 GMT
What about the people that are wrongly convicted? What about the medics who die in action fighting to save life ? What about the nurses and doctors and ground staff . ? What about the innocent civilians ? Modern forensics don't get many if any wrong convictions in 2015 . The circumstances that you are referring to are different. Do you know that they don't get many convictions wrong or are you assuming it? As Ghandi once said "An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind" The beliefs and actions of Ghandi also somewhat disprove your earlier theory that 'you don't win wars by holding hands and preaching tolerance'. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 26, 2015 20:33:12 GMT
Is 'legalised revenge' via execution the right thing to do? They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 20:36:39 GMT
What about the medics who die in action fighting to save life ? What about the nurses and doctors and ground staff . ? What about the innocent civilians ? Modern forensics don't get many if any wrong convictions in 2015 . The circumstances that you are referring to are different. Do you know that they don't get many convictions wrong or are you assuming it? As Ghandi once said "An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind" The beliefs and actions of Ghandi also somewhat disprove your earlier theory that 'you don't win wars by holding hands and preaching tolerance'. I know what the odds of DNA evidence is and modern surveillance in getting things wrong are .... Just ask Bin Laden .... Whatever Ghandi may have preached is flawed . It is one of the most nuclear volatile countries on the planet and is constantly involved with skirmishes on its border with Pakistan. Mumf 1 Ghandi 0 |
|
|
|
Post by stokeharry on May 26, 2015 20:39:53 GMT
Yes .....dead men don't make the same mistake twice . Maybe they should behead the bastard in public and post the video on the internet, seems to work for some brutal inhuman filth in Syria can't beat a bit of publicity. +1 Hang , draw and quatre the bastard , smother him in pig fat and set his corpse on fire |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on May 26, 2015 21:01:33 GMT
Execution doesn't strike me as a very effective deterrent for people who believe in paradise and martyrdom.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 21:05:30 GMT
Execution doesn't strike me as a very effective deterrent for people who believe in paradise and martyrdom. Oh it is son . They never commit atrocities again and shooting them is much cheaper ....hundreds of thousands of pounds cheaper than keeping them in prison for the rest of their lives. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 21:19:36 GMT
They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. Oh, so you are a believer then are you? You will of course know how the old Mosaic laws were no longer required later on? |
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 26, 2015 21:21:35 GMT
Wrongful convictions do happen. Therefore no.
In terms of terrorism, it doesn't serve as a deterrent and simply spreads a message and creates platforms for further retaliatory violence.
|
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 26, 2015 21:23:33 GMT
They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. Not my bloody bible. |
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 26, 2015 21:24:01 GMT
All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. Oh, so you are a believer then are you? You will of course know how the old Mosaic laws were no longer required later on? That bloody lefty Jesus. |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on May 26, 2015 21:27:07 GMT
Execution doesn't strike me as a very effective deterrent for people who believe in paradise and martyrdom. Oh it is son . They never commit atrocities again and shooting them is much cheaper ....hundreds of thousands of pounds cheaper than keeping them in prison for the rest of their lives. I said deterrent. |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 26, 2015 21:35:59 GMT
Wrongful convictions do happen. Therefore no. In terms of terrorism, it doesn't serve as a deterrent and simply spreads a message and creates platforms for further retaliatory violence. Very much agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by jmst4 on May 27, 2015 1:11:04 GMT
There's no chance he would have been released though is there? He couldn't possibly do it again One bullet or syringe costs Bugger all..... A life in prison costs hundreds of thousands and in six months time you won't even remember his name . You do the maths . If you take into account the timely appeals process and that he will likely serve a good 12+ years anyway, it will probably end up costing more to execute him. Also, death is what he wants, why give it to him? |
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on May 27, 2015 7:07:54 GMT
They'll be getting you to raise the question for the EU referendum with a balanced question like that. How about instead, are you in favour of capital punishment to avenge the murders of innocent people, like yourself, by cowardly terrorists? or even better, should disgusting kiddy fiddlers who murder young children be killed or would you prefer to pay for their comfortable incarceration for the rest of their lives? All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. Sounds an awful lot like Sharia Law to me. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 27, 2015 7:16:26 GMT
All convicted paedophiles should face a mandatory death sentence, the only way to stop these depraved perverts is to take their lives, stop fucking about with them what's more anyone proved to have shielded them or deliberately covered up their crimes should face the same punishment, an eye for an eye as it says in our bible. Sounds an awful lot like Sharia Law to me. Does it well there you go it must be a good thing then, I know fuck all about Sharia law and sincerely hope I never do, bring back the death penalty under our own law. |
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 27, 2015 8:00:11 GMT
Sounds an awful lot like Sharia Law to me. Does it well there you go it must be a good thing then, I know fuck all about Sharia law and sincerely hope I never do, bring back the death penalty under our own law. You're right you do know fuck all  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2015 8:06:27 GMT
One bullet or syringe costs Bugger all..... A life in prison costs hundreds of thousands and in six months time you won't even remember his name . You do the maths . If you take into account the timely appeals process and that he will likely serve a good 12+ years anyway, it will probably end up costing more to execute him. Also, death is what he wants, why give it to him? Don't bother with any trial then .....just shoot him and drag his body through the streets . |
|
