|
|
Post by slicko on Apr 25, 2015 19:12:57 GMT
MOTD running order: Bur/Lei, CP/Hull, ManC/AV, New/Swa, Sto/Sun, QPR/WHU, Sou/Tot, WBA/Liv. Some great stuff @bbcone 10.30
5th, hmmmmm? Stay up or watch in the morning?
|
|
|
|
Post by nutterpotter on Apr 25, 2015 19:15:55 GMT
We're game of the day on Sky!
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemanusa on Apr 25, 2015 19:21:28 GMT
We're game of the day on Sky! Really? lol I was a good game but the Citeh Villa up and down was a good watch. |
|
|
|
Post by slicko on Apr 25, 2015 19:22:47 GMT
We're game of the day on Sky! The sky selectors actually watch the games |
|
|
|
Post by heavysoul on Apr 25, 2015 19:34:55 GMT
I was at the Brit don't think I could go through that again avoiding motd today!
|
|
|
|
Post by slicko on Apr 25, 2015 22:36:27 GMT
Gritty eyes, made the wrong choice
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2015 22:37:19 GMT
Lol. What an edit that was. Made it look like Sunderland battered us.
Dear me.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcwebby on Apr 25, 2015 22:38:25 GMT
Lol. What an edit that was. Made it look like Sunderland battered us. Dear me. I was just about to post exactly the same mate, truly unbelievable |
|
|
|
Post by BuzzB on Apr 25, 2015 22:40:16 GMT
Wickham.....2 points dropped! WTF!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Apr 25, 2015 22:40:20 GMT
Lol. What an edit that was. Made it look like Sunderland battered us. Dear me. The BBC do it every fucking time. We could win 12-0, have 90% possession and 100 shots and still the biased, anti-Stoke cunts at the BBC would still manage to make it look like we struggled. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcwebby on Apr 25, 2015 22:55:35 GMT
Lol. What an edit that was. Made it look like Sunderland battered us. Dear me. The BBC do it every fucking time. We could win 12-0, have 90% possession and 100 shots and still the biased, anti-Stoke cunts at the BBC would still manage to make it look like we struggled. With our finishing we would still draw 1-1  |
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Apr 25, 2015 22:58:57 GMT
WBA 26% possession at home  |
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Apr 25, 2015 23:05:14 GMT
WBA 26% possession at home Solid  |
|
|
|
Post by haway on Apr 25, 2015 23:29:20 GMT
Wickham.....2 points dropped! WTF!! He means that we survived your first half onslaught to come in level and had the better of the 2nd half - where we should have gotten what could have ultimately been the winner |
|
|
|
Post by knockabout84 on Apr 25, 2015 23:53:09 GMT
Wickham.....2 points dropped! WTF!! He means that we survived your first half onslaught to come in level and had the better of the 2nd half - where we should have gotten what could have ultimately been the winner I suspect what BuzzB is actually getting at is that looking at the game as a whole, in the second half the honors were more evenly split and we were far superior in the first half, therefore indicating that on the whole it was stoke that "dropped" the 2 points, rather than vice versa. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Apr 26, 2015 7:35:22 GMT
Just seen it.
Crazy edit by the BBC as per usual.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Apr 26, 2015 8:11:01 GMT
yeah I know but I don't really see how they could not have shown the scruffy goal Sunderland scored and the 4 sitters we put on a plate for them which they missed and that in essence was the substance of the Sunderland coverage.
What they probably didn't need to do was show them all again after the game while Keown talked us through them, I think it was that which did most to distort the picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by nutterpotter on Apr 26, 2015 8:14:40 GMT
For all the possession we had and the dangerous crosses whipped into the box, we didn't really have many clear cut chances though did we? Can only remember Diouf's which was a good save by their keeper.
We had a few long range efforts by Adam but nothing else really.
Sunderland had the better chances even though we dominated the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by alansuddick on Apr 26, 2015 10:04:11 GMT
Wickham.....2 points dropped! WTF!! He means that we survived your first half onslaught tpo come in level and had the better of the 2nd half - where we should have gotten what could have ultimately been the winner The Better of the 2nd half my arse, they had A better second half but defo not The.must have been one of the 1000 no shows who listened to the unbiased commentry on radio black cat.worst team at thev brit this year and they will go down! |
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Apr 26, 2015 10:07:10 GMT
For all the possession we had and the dangerous crosses whipped into the box, we didn't really have many clear cut chances though did we? Can only remember Diouf's which was a good save by their keeper. We had a few long range efforts by Adam but nothing else really. Sunderland had the better chances even though we dominated the game. The voice of reason, prepare for a backlash. |
|
|
|
Post by taytotheimpailer on Apr 26, 2015 11:56:57 GMT
Lol. What an edit that was. Made it look like Sunderland battered us. Dear me. Fancy showing the best chances of the game, such an outrage. No different than Southampton last week where it looked like we bossed the game. Maybe they should show us passing the ball around on the edge of the box and screw the goalmouth action. Fact is they had the better chances second half. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2015 12:25:15 GMT
We'd tried our best to give Sunderland the game. Why shouldn't MOTD do the same? In all honesty, I didn't notice any particular bias against us in their coverage, and I'm usually the first one to moan about them when there is.
|
|
|
|
Post by haway on Apr 26, 2015 12:50:18 GMT
He means that we survived your first half onslaught tpo come in level and had the better of the 2nd half - where we should have gotten what could have ultimately been the winner The Better of the 2nd half my arse, they had A better second half but defo not The.must have been one of the 1000 no shows who listened to the unbiased commentry on radio black cat.worst team at thev brit this year and they will go down! Struggled to read that mate, but it was our team who had the best chances in the 2nd half and you's could have easily regretted not killing us off in the 1st half. |
|
|
|
Post by upthefud on Apr 26, 2015 12:53:41 GMT
Vote UKIP boys.
They'll sort the BBC out
|
|
|
|
Post by taytotheimpailer on Apr 26, 2015 13:22:59 GMT
We'd tried our best to give Sunderland the game. Why shouldn't MOTD do the same? In all honesty, I didn't notice any particular bias against us in their coverage, and I'm usually the first one to moan about them when there is. I noticed some idiots moaning last week about MOTD before was even shown. Sums up some on here, no matter what they do the moaners are out. Showed the best highlights, yes we bossed the majority of the game but as far as chances were concerned it showed the best highlights. |
|
