|
Post by jeycov on Jan 30, 2015 16:32:01 GMT
only my opinion but I thought Adam's was naughty, I know he plays for us but he is a bit naughty like that and I have to be honest and say I thought Adam deserved his ban, as for Costa the first one yes, deffo ban, the second not so sure about..........I know you won't agree but I think the FA have got it about right, do agree though that perhaps the ban should have been extended after the appeal by a further game He deserved to be sent off - Liverpool miss out on retrospective action in this case. With all of the punishments, it's mostly other teams that benefit. - Man City, Everton and Villa in this case I think that one of the match bans should be the next time the player starts against that team.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2015 16:35:32 GMT
only my opinion but I thought Adam's was naughty, I know he plays for us but he is a bit naughty like that and I have to be honest and say I thought Adam deserved his ban, as for Costa the first one yes, deffo ban, the second not so sure about..........I know you won't agree but I think the FA have got it about right, do agree though that perhaps the ban should have been extended after the appeal by a further game He deserved to be sent off and with all of the punishments, it's mostly other teams that benefit. I think that one of the match bans should be the next time the player starts against that team. agree completely but until that rule comes in, we can't really have a go at Costa, Chelsea or the team of people that decided on this punishment can we? they're not the ones who set the rules, they simply judge and base their punishment on the rules laid down by FIFA as although the FA decide on the number of games the ban runs for, it's FIFA that decided they had to be "Consecutive games"
|
|
|
Post by wembley4372 on Jan 30, 2015 16:38:08 GMT
only my opinion but I thought Adam's was naughty, I know he plays for us but he is a bit naughty like that and I have to be honest and say I thought Adam deserved his ban, as for Costa the first one yes, deffo ban, the second not so sure about..........I know you won't agree but I think the FA have got it about right, do agree though that perhaps the ban should have been extended after the appeal by a further game He deserved to be sent off - Liverpool miss out on retrospective action in this case. With all of the punishments, it's mostly other teams that benefit. - Man City, Everton and Villa in this case I think that one of the match bans should be the next time the player starts against that team. Yer too soft JC, they should be made to play with 10 men next time the teams meet.
|
|