|
|
Post by Squeekster on Oct 25, 2014 17:45:59 GMT
?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 17:47:44 GMT
Maybe his boots didn't match, in a fashion sort of way - and he decided to change them.
|
|
|
|
Post by agingerstokie on Oct 25, 2014 17:48:15 GMT
Imagine if that was the booking to get him his 1 match ban?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Oct 25, 2014 17:50:26 GMT
You can't leave the pitch with out the refs permission so he didn't so he shouldn't of been booked!
Another poor ref and a poor afternoon all round for the biased prick.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Oct 25, 2014 17:52:33 GMT
Time wasting?
|
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Oct 25, 2014 17:53:36 GMT
As I said in the match thread: too many shoes on the field. They don't want players to start wearing boots on their hands because that would be dangerous? Seriously though  The ref must have felt he was wasting time, despite the fact we were losing. That or he removed an object of clothing on the field, but it's not like it was his shirt, it was a fecking shoe. It was a shit card from an otherwise fair ref IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Oct 25, 2014 17:57:48 GMT
Having a football boot in his hand?
I believe that is an offence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Oct 25, 2014 17:58:53 GMT
As I said in the match thread: too many shoes on the field. They don't want players to start wearing boots on their hands because that would be dangerous? Seriously though The ref must have felt he was wasting time, despite the fact we were losing. That or he removed an object of clothing on the field, but it's not like it was his shirt, it was a fecking shoe. It was a shit card from an otherwise fair ref IMO. ? The ref didn't stop the game though did he? Well from where i was he didn't so how was it time wasting? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 17:59:41 GMT
Ryan tied a Granny knot on his boots. As the match progressed, he wanted to tighten his laces, but struggled to do this. The Granny knot took control. Another pair of boots were needed. By this time the ref got a bit pissed off and booked him for time wasting.
Hughes in the meantime, was shouting at the ref to carry on with the game - after all, why should a game be stopped for a player (Nancy), to adjust his footwear.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 18:05:39 GMT
Ryan had hold of his boot too tightly and didn't let go even after being warned by the ref  |
|
|
|
Post by scarlet on Oct 25, 2014 18:07:50 GMT
There is a little known historical reason for Moss' actions today.
In his previous job at the drummer of Culture Club the band played a festival with '60s songstress Sandie Shaw, famous for strutting the stage barefoot. Shaw's performance was phenomenal that day and Culture Club were completely blown off stage, ending their set after three numbers to a wall of embarrassing boos, bottles of piss and rotten fruit. Moss never fully recovered from the psychological scars from that incident and the sight of any barefooted person in public brings out the bastard side of his personality.
|
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Oct 25, 2014 18:15:27 GMT
As I said in the match thread: too many shoes on the field. They don't want players to start wearing boots on their hands because that would be dangerous? Seriously though The ref must have felt he was wasting time, despite the fact we were losing. That or he removed an object of clothing on the field, but it's not like it was his shirt, it was a fecking shoe. It was a shit card from an otherwise fair ref IMO. ? The ref didn't stop the game though did he? Well from where i was he didn't so how was it time wasting? like the rest of us I don't know. That's why it was such a stupid card |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Oct 25, 2014 18:20:58 GMT
Because he's just invented changing boots.  |
|
|
|
Post by lancer on Oct 25, 2014 18:22:03 GMT
Why didn't the ref just send Ryan off to do his boots up, and add a little time on if the though he was time wasting, although why anyone would time waste when their team is one nil down confounds me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 19:13:42 GMT
I do believe that Ryan has very smelly feet, and the ref couldn't stand any more of the aroma!
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Oct 25, 2014 19:15:34 GMT
Worse still, he then made him leave the pitch, putting us down to nine men.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Oct 25, 2014 19:23:40 GMT
As I understand it, Charlie was off being looked at, Ryan's shoe came off and he dropped to sort it.
The Ref. ordered him off to fix it but Ryan, probably knowing we'd be down to 9 men at a v. dangerous time, ignored him.
So I'm presuming it was for a bit of dissent.
Harsh and a bit petty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 19:37:52 GMT
I assume it was because the ref told him to go off the pitch and he ignored him, can't complain really - especially when the ref allowed him plenty of time to try and sort his boot out a few minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingstokie on Oct 25, 2014 21:05:55 GMT
For being Ryan Shawcross
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 21:12:16 GMT
Ask old "C Cup".  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2014 21:34:39 GMT
Well at least Moses didn't dive again, so I suppose it has all turned out alright in the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2014 6:56:09 GMT
For being in charge of offensive boots during the hours of daylight, and looking at the ref in a funny way, and loitering with intent to pass a ball, and treading on the lines marking out the pitch....SAVAGE...YOU ARE A BIGOT.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matthews dad on Oct 26, 2014 8:48:13 GMT
I assume it was because the ref told him to go off the pitch and he ignored him, can't complain really - especially when the ref allowed him plenty of time to try and sort his boot out a few minutes. Kinell, an honest and truthful answer, you don't want start doing this. All the refs are against Syoke you know! |
|
|
|
Post by scarlet on Oct 26, 2014 17:57:11 GMT
On the same day that West Brom's Dawson got away with elbowing Palace keeper Speroni out of the game, with no punishment and the award of a goal, Ryan Shawcross was booked for taking his boot off.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuum on Oct 27, 2014 5:23:38 GMT
I thought the ref gave us nowt (not that we deserved anything) and gave them everything.
Last minute summed it up for me. They had a throw in down our left side and the ref had already indicated 4mins of extra time. They arsed about and had three different players walk over to the line and then decide not to take it , walk away or drop it for another player to pick up..it was absolutely blatant. Whilst it was perhaps not a bookable offence (unless he was going to book all three of them), it certainly wasted 45 seconds, maybe even more. This wasn't the only example of time wasting within the 4mins added time.
I think the ref then played the 4 mins + 10 secs to account for Southamptons delaying tactics.
Small point but summed up his bias in my opinion. I just think he believed Southampton were as nice as pie and we were rough house shite.
|
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 27, 2014 11:48:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Oct 27, 2014 11:50:51 GMT
He was booked for tying his shoe laces. Get it right.
|
|
|
|
Post by podolipotter on Oct 27, 2014 12:12:09 GMT
We will be getting booked for kicking off at the start of a game next! Pathetic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Oct 27, 2014 12:24:47 GMT
I think the team were pretty desperate to get to half time at just one down, so yeah, that may have been the reason. Asmir took an absolute age to take one goal kick towards the end of the half. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on Oct 27, 2014 12:32:49 GMT
Anyone recall Denis Smith getting sent off away to Burnley (???) for going off the pitch and coming back on without permission? Or am I just getting senile?
|
|
The ref must have felt he was wasting time, despite the fact we were losing. That or he removed an object of clothing on the field, but it's not like it was his shirt, it was a fecking shoe.
