|
Post by sufolkstokie on Sept 20, 2014 17:03:56 GMT
Well that was frustrating
Played well for long periods and could/should have been 2 or 3 up. But then last 20 mins first half, we just switched off and looked like we did not know each other
Diouf appeared to be injured? and N'zonzi looked very shaky (something to do with Barton?)
Second half looked good but sucker punch at the end was a killer
Again should have scored at least one or two more
QPR were very poor, so a draw is disappointing to say the least
At times it appears we are too complacent, to the point of believing we are better than we are at the moment
Thought Wilson, Whelan, Moses and Crouch were excellent, as was Shawcross (except he switched off for the first goal and stop bloody holding on the box!!)
Some of our lot thought Bego looked shaky again - but I think hard to tell as little to do
Sidders actually got a lot of tackles in and shored us up, but his tackle for their free kick looked reckless
Arnie just looks like he wants to be anywhere but on the pitch
Quite sombre mood at the end - defiantly 2 points dropped
On the tube back, QPR fans generally agreed they got out of jail
It is happening a tad too much right now
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 20, 2014 17:17:37 GMT
Someone is going thrashed by Stoke.
|
|
|
Post by ruts66 on Sept 20, 2014 17:36:25 GMT
Just back, also.
So frustrating that we did not press our advantage when one up.
Moses was killing them down the left but we kept slowing the play when we could have released him.
We have to be more ruthless...
|
|
|
Post by wokinghampotter on Sept 20, 2014 20:23:09 GMT
Yes very disappointing. We should have been out of sight by half time and then have scored two more after Crouch scored, through Pieters and N'Zonzi!
Definitely 2 points dropped
|
|
|
Post by stokiesteve on Sept 20, 2014 20:35:33 GMT
Frustrating is becoming the theme for this season.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 22:50:58 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 20, 2014 23:07:05 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. Defeat?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 23:12:18 GMT
Yes....it felt like one.
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Sept 20, 2014 23:12:58 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. Defeat? Must admit I read "defeat" and never stopped to question the word, I guess when you are winning with fewer than 2 minutes left on the clock and you manage to piss 2 vital points up the wall then "defeat" is near enough right
|
|
|
Post by block30row19 on Sept 20, 2014 23:35:06 GMT
I feel happier with the point now that we lost :-)
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 21, 2014 6:20:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by bathstoke on Sept 21, 2014 6:20:35 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. Sidwell looked like a happy puppy copying Shawcross...
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 21, 2014 7:56:08 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. I think (as much as I like Charlie) he was right to bring him off as he'd been very poor all game. Sidwell actually did well when he came on but blotted his copybook with that late foul.
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 21, 2014 7:59:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 21, 2014 7:59:46 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. Defeat? Not defeat, but pretty poor really.
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Sept 21, 2014 8:05:13 GMT
We shouldn't have taken off Adam. Sidwells rash tackle led to our defeat. I think (as much as I like Charlie) he was right to bring him off as he'd been very poor all game. Sidwell actually did well when he came on but blotted his copybook with that late foul. Agree with this. They were starting to take hold of the midfield and Charlie was knackered and out of the game Sidwell put a few good tackles in and stopped their attacks and put us back on the front foot until the foul
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Sept 21, 2014 8:08:54 GMT
You can understand a player like Sidwell wanting a bit too much when coming on, but it was a stupid tackle anyway!
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 21, 2014 23:54:03 GMT
Not defeat, but pretty poor really. Thought it was a pretty entertaining game personally. Lennon on MOTD described us as 'breathtaking'. Maybe he and I watched a different game than yourself. Or maybe we weren't wearing tinted glasses. No doubt you'll retort with some random and/or bizarre statement or comment that bears little or no relevance to the subject matter rest assured if you do, I'll be bailing out a lot quicker than the last time I tried to have a sensible debate with you
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 7:22:54 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 7:22:54 GMT
Not defeat, but pretty poor really. Thought it was a pretty entertaining game personally. Lennon on MOTD described us as 'breathtaking'. Maybe he and I watched a different game than yourself. Or maybe we weren't wearing tinted glasses. No doubt you'll retort with some random and/or bizarre statement or comment that bears little or no relevance to the subject matter rest assured if you do, I'll be bailing out a lot quicker than the last time I tried to have a sensible debate with you I'm just fed up that the job wasn't finished against a poor side and that we just invited then onto us and that it was poor that when under no pressure we failed to hit the target. Know had that been any other managing that he'd have no doubt been slaughtered by not only yourself.
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 7:44:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 7:44:03 GMT
Ely.
And poor in the sense too that our defence for some reason or other just don't look at it and whatever has happened with Begovic I just don't know because for sone reason he looks totally shot to bits.
But anyway you keep those tinted specs to yourself.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Sept 22, 2014 12:41:35 GMT
Thought it was a pretty entertaining game personally. Lennon on MOTD described us as 'breathtaking'. Maybe he and I watched a different game than yourself. Or maybe we weren't wearing tinted glasses. No doubt you'll retort with some random and/or bizarre statement or comment that bears little or no relevance to the subject matter rest assured if you do, I'll be bailing out a lot quicker than the last time I tried to have a sensible debate with you I'm just fed up that the job wasn't finished against a poor side and that we just invited then onto us and that it was poor that when under no pressure we failed to hit the target. Know had that been any other managing that he'd have no doubt been slaughtered by not only yourself. What do you mean by your last sentence....? I genuinely don't understand the point you're trying to make there fella Ive just read it out loud to myself and it sounds as though Ive drunk 10 cans of special brew.......
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 12:47:54 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 12:47:54 GMT
I'm just fed up that the job wasn't finished against a poor side and that we just invited then onto us and that it was poor that when under no pressure we failed to hit the target. Know had that been any other managing that he'd have no doubt been slaughtered by not only yourself. What do you mean by your last sentence....? I genuinely don't understand the point you're trying to make there fella Ive just read it out loud to myself and it sounds as though Ive drunk 10 cans of special brew....... Seems as though certain folk are just burying their heads in the sand and failing to see it for what it is but its the very same who'd be quick to call it as it is had this happened under TP. Thank goodness we've picked up points away because at home things look a complete shambles.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Sept 22, 2014 12:49:11 GMT
What do you mean by your last sentence....? I genuinely don't understand the point you're trying to make there fella Ive just read it out loud to myself and it sounds as though Ive drunk 10 cans of special brew....... Seems as though certain folk are just burying their heads in the sand and failing to see it for what it is but its the very same who'd be quick to call it as it is had this happened under TP. Thank goodness we've picked up points away because at home things look a complete shambles. Aahh got you
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 12:56:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 12:56:01 GMT
Seems as though certain folk are just burying their heads in the sand and failing to see it for what it is but its the very same who'd be quick to call it as it is had this happened under TP. Thank goodness we've picked up points away because at home things look a complete shambles. Aahh got you Good. Keep an eye out for when Ely logs back on I'll blag his head a whole lot more.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Sept 22, 2014 12:58:25 GMT
Aahh got you Good. Keep an eye out for when Ely logs back on I'll blag his head a whole lot more. Im sure you will
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 22, 2014 13:05:01 GMT
Aahh got you Good. Keep an eye out for when Ely logs back on I'll blag his head a whole lot more. And, once again, I'm out (wave)
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 17:35:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 17:35:31 GMT
Good. Keep an eye out for when Ely logs back on I'll blag his head a whole lot more. And, once again, I'm out (wave) Lol. Before you do finally go then if you take those tinted specs off before burying your head back in the sand then that'll stop e'm from scratching.
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Sept 22, 2014 18:23:04 GMT
And, once again, I'm out (wave) Lol. Before you do finally go then if you take those tinted specs off before burying your head back in the sand then that'll stop e'm from scratching. The absolute pinnacle of hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Just Back
Sept 22, 2014 19:22:44 GMT
via mobile
Post by tazi on Sept 22, 2014 19:22:44 GMT
Lol. Before you do finally go then if you take those tinted specs off before burying your head back in the sand then that'll stop e'm from scratching. The absolute pinnacle of hypocrisy. Exactly.
|
|