|
Post by siggy on Sept 15, 2014 20:27:14 GMT
FFP is much more sly about being in the big clubs interests.
Whilst a rich owner can still come in and plough money in so long as they write the loan off or exchange it for shares, it restricts smaller clubs from having a rich owner come in buying players because its not the one off transfer fee thats a problem ( that can be written off over a few years or even some or all of the fee got back if they sell the player) but the wages bill is what causes the problem so if you can't afford the wages whilst the big clubs can you won't ever be able be able to attract the players they have their eyes on and if you find a hidden gem they can take him off you when he's out of contract.
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Sept 15, 2014 20:37:51 GMT
Interestingly, it was Swansea, the model for self sustaining ownership, who were the only club to object to FFP in the Premier League.
|
|