|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Sept 13, 2014 16:56:19 GMT
That coupled with the Marksmen's tirade in the Villa issue and I make that 26 different mentions of Pulis in two magazines so far this season. Nothing like 'moving on' is there  |
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Sept 13, 2014 16:59:35 GMT
Not heard Marks interview yet but he'd be correct if he said 'nothing dropped for us'.
|
|
|
|
Post by ross1982 on Sept 13, 2014 17:00:36 GMT
Nothing like a stoke loss to bring the usual shitty comments from you.Bringing up the same old shit, we lost, Tony's in sandbanks, please fuck off!
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Sept 13, 2014 17:01:38 GMT
Nothing like a stoke loss to bring the usual shitty comments from you.Bringing up the same old shit, we lost, Tony's in sandbanks, please fuck off! Tony is here. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Sept 13, 2014 17:05:13 GMT
Both magazines so far have included weighty Pulis related articles. Surprising, no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 17:06:11 GMT
Either we want a Pulis debate on here or we don't?
|
|
|
|
Post by ross1982 on Sept 13, 2014 17:06:18 GMT
Is he the voice in your head that drives you to be such a case?
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Sept 13, 2014 17:08:14 GMT
The writers are clearly trying to satisfy the insatiable Pulis related desires of the vocal minority momo.
Heard a wonderful one on the walk up to Heron Cross tonight. "We never used to lose at home under Tony". He really did attract the devotion of the more unhinged members of our support.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 13, 2014 17:19:24 GMT
Smudge pointed out at the start of the article that we wouldn't have mentioned TP in the magazine, other than when we played Palace, but his decision to quit (after our Villa printing deadline) couldn't be ignored.
Don't worry, there won't be many (if any) more mentions of him in the fanzine this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Sept 13, 2014 17:28:36 GMT
Smudge pointed out at the start of the article that we wouldn't have mentioned TP in the magazine, other than when we played Palace, but his decision to quit (after our Villa printing deadline) couldn't be ignored. Don't worry, there won't be many (if any) more mentions of him in the fanzine this season. What about the Marksman?  |
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Sept 13, 2014 17:50:34 GMT
Smudge pointed out at the start of the article that we wouldn't have mentioned TP in the magazine, other than when we played Palace, but his decision to quit (after our Villa printing deadline) couldn't be ignored. Don't worry, there won't be many (if any) more mentions of him in the fanzine this season. What about the Marksman? The Marksman's page in the oatcake is best skipped imo momo in an otherwise good fanzine,although i do miss the away day league. |
|
|
|
Post by stokerstayinup on Sept 13, 2014 17:50:53 GMT
That coupled with the Marksmen's tirade in the Villa issue and I make that 26 different mentions of Pulis in two magazines so far this season. Nothing like 'moving on' is there You mention him more than anyone! |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 13, 2014 17:54:08 GMT
What about the Marksman? The Marksman's page in the oatcake is best skipped imo momo in an otherwise good fanzine,although i do miss the away day league. Mark's article was excellent today. |
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Sept 13, 2014 18:12:37 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Sept 13, 2014 18:16:54 GMT
The Marksman's page in the oatcake is best skipped imo momo in an otherwise good fanzine,although i do miss the away day league. Mark's article was excellent today. Not read it today Dave so can't comment but like i say i normally skip it but i'll make an effort to read it sometime. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Sept 13, 2014 18:19:26 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great! Rubbish |
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Sept 13, 2014 18:20:14 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great! Oh for fucksake, we finished 9th. |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Sept 13, 2014 18:22:30 GMT
I read the article and I must say that I found it wholly unnecessary and spiteful. It belittled the normally very high standards in the fanzine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 13, 2014 18:24:27 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great! Are you for real? |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Sept 13, 2014 18:29:09 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great! Are you for real? Irrespective of his comments Dave, which I don't necessarily endorse, I think the article was entitled something like 'Poor show TP' and it was more a case of 'poor show, Oatcake'. You know that I'm usually very complimentary about the fanzine's content. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 13, 2014 18:31:50 GMT
I was replying to Bexhill Potter's ridiculous post March, which has nothing to do with the article in the fanzine.You're entitled to your opinion about the article, we wouldn't expect everyone to agree with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 13, 2014 18:56:04 GMT
Our greatest, most successful manager but we have moved on and so far not doing that great! You missed the whole of last season then? Last night we had the dossier taking credit for last season, now it doesn't exist. Indoctrination. |
|
|
|
Post by kidcrewbob on Sept 13, 2014 18:59:46 GMT
Pulis would NOT have lost the first two home matches - just sayin like....
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Sept 13, 2014 18:59:56 GMT
Have the oatcake ever done a piece on Mark Hughes's departure from Fulham?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 19:00:02 GMT
That coupled with the Marksmen's tirade in the Villa issue and I make that 26 different mentions of Pulis in two magazines so far this season. Nothing like 'moving on' is there I have "moved on". You are still counting, and therefore have not "moved on". |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Sept 13, 2014 19:01:05 GMT
That coupled with the Marksmen's tirade in the Villa issue and I make that 26 different mentions of Pulis in two magazines so far this season. Nothing like 'moving on' is there I have "moved on". You are still counting, and therefore have not "moved on". Nor has the oatcake but they do keep telling people to move on. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Sept 13, 2014 19:09:41 GMT
Pulis would NOT have lost the first two home matches - just sayin like.... And look at the great displays, results and goal feasts he orchestrated at the etihad. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 13, 2014 19:24:27 GMT
I have "moved on". You are still counting, and therefore have not "moved on". Nor has the oatcake but they do keep telling people to move on. Do we really? We've probably said that it would be good if people moved on, but we've never TOLD people to do so. What would be the point? |
|
|
|
Post by kidcrewbob on Sept 13, 2014 19:28:30 GMT
Pulis would NOT have lost the first two home matches - just sayin like.... And look at the great displays, results and goal feasts he orchestrated at the etihad. Not disputing away form - he was woeful for the most part BUT he knew that our home form was key to our survival - something Hughes has yet to learn seemingly..... |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Sept 13, 2014 19:29:30 GMT
Keeping that cauldron mixed?
Pathetic, pathetic man.
|
|
