|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Aug 31, 2014 9:48:10 GMT
Cleary isn't happy that we won at Man City! Coming across as very 'Pro' Man City. They were unlucky, shame for Joe Hart etc.... Prick lol
|
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Aug 31, 2014 9:49:17 GMT
He's been very complimentary about our defending.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Aug 31, 2014 9:50:59 GMT
Cleary isn't happy that we won at Man City! Coming across as very 'Pro' Man City. They were unlucky, shame for Joe Hart etc.... Prick lol You must have watched the alternative version. In the one I watched he was very complementary about us. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 9:51:30 GMT
His views on their "penalty" shout were fucking scandalous.
|
|
|
|
Post by adamsson on Aug 31, 2014 9:52:42 GMT
Completely wrong on the penalty if Eric touched him it was only because he was throwing him self to the floor
|
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Aug 31, 2014 9:55:01 GMT
They were both nailed on penalties.
|
|
|
|
Post by thepirehillpoet on Aug 31, 2014 9:57:43 GMT
Cleary isn't happy that we won at Man City! Coming across as very 'Pro' Man City. They were unlucky, shame for Joe Hart etc.... Prick lol Not what I watched, I thought he was very complimentary about us. Puzzled. |
|
|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Aug 31, 2014 9:59:34 GMT
Hmm maybe I just don't like him and my mind was tainted when writing the post. Oh well who cares we won at Man City!
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 31, 2014 10:09:54 GMT
They were both nailed on penalties. Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. |
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Aug 31, 2014 10:11:09 GMT
They were both nailed on penalties. Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 10:12:27 GMT
Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. He didn't touch him mate. The camera angle makes it look like he did but in reality he was nowhere near him. I was right in line with it and about 20 yards away...if that. |
|
|
|
Post by coates on Aug 31, 2014 10:13:21 GMT
Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. Difference is man city and toure are prime offenders for diving, so hard to know why they actually have been fouled. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 31, 2014 10:14:05 GMT
Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. He swung at it, missed and moved his leg, then Toure threw himself to the floor, there was no contact, its as simple as that. |
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Aug 31, 2014 10:17:32 GMT
Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. He didn't touch him mate. The camera angle makes it look like he did but in reality he was nowhere near him. I was right in line with it and about 20 yards away...if that. I'll have to see it again but I've seen it a few times and it looks clear as day. |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Aug 31, 2014 10:22:45 GMT
Whatever he's said about us today he's a fucking horrible gobshite.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 31, 2014 10:24:34 GMT
Both certain penalties. The first wasn't given because we're Stoke away at the champions and the linesman didn't have the balls to give it. The second was a pretty wild challenge, nowhere near the ball and Toure's theatrics have done for him but it was a certain penalty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Aug 31, 2014 10:30:12 GMT
I thought they were both penalties.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 10:33:34 GMT
The contact and that's whether there was any,wasn't anywhere near enough to hinder Toure's run,he could quite easily have carried on without even breaking stride,therefore not a foul.
Not every bit of contact is a foul,Toure dived and deserved what he got.
Noble is a twat for buying into this new fangled idea of if there is contact you have every right to go down.
It stinks and is nothing other than cheating,and when pundits and players alike are banging the same drum week in week out it will only get worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 31, 2014 10:35:05 GMT
Nope, you need contact for a pen, there wasn't any for the second until Toure threw himself to the floor. Pieters played the man and not the ball. That's a penalty regardless of what Toure's doing. He didn't touch him though!? He nearly does and it is an absolutely stupid asking for it challenge but if there's contact I'm the Pope. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 31, 2014 10:36:04 GMT
Both certain penalties. The first wasn't given because we're Stoke away at the champions and the linesman didn't have the balls to give it. The second was a pretty wild challenge, nowhere near the ball and Toure's theatrics have done for him but it was a certain penalty. No where near the ball or the man. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 11:20:05 GMT
One thing i don't understand is Costas shot goes through the goalkeepers legs and it's a great finish, but Diouf finishes the same way and it's bad goalkeeping!.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 12:05:03 GMT
One thing i don't understand is Costas shot goes through the goalkeepers legs and it's a great finish, but Diouf finishes the same way and it's bad goalkeeping!. Bit of a mixture of big club bias and the fact that it seems "cool" now to just rail on Joe Hart i think |
|
|
|
Post by coates on Aug 31, 2014 12:20:42 GMT
One thing i don't understand is Costas shot goes through the goalkeepers legs and it's a great finish, but Diouf finishes the same way and it's bad goalkeeping!. Bit of a mixture of big club bias and the fact that it seems "cool" now to just rail on Joe Hart i think Joe hart always has a mistake in him I think that's why. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Aug 31, 2014 12:28:49 GMT
One thing i don't understand is Costas shot goes through the goalkeepers legs and it's a great finish, but Diouf finishes the same way and it's bad goalkeeping!. I think hart could have done better. He had time to prepare himself That said fantastic goal great finishing |
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Aug 31, 2014 12:31:30 GMT
Noble is a very good player, and like Shawcross, an infinitely better player than many who are called up ahead of him.
Fabian Delph, Jack Colback...you're having a laugh Woy. Noble is a far better player than either of them.
As for him on TV this morning, I didn't see any of what the opening poster highlighted.
|
|
|
|
Post by ed5993 on Aug 31, 2014 13:04:34 GMT
Penalty decisions like both in question are debated week in week out... and are inevitably interpreted different ways by different people. But ultimately the bottom line is that the refereeing at the game yesterday was consistent.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 31, 2014 18:08:41 GMT
Penalty  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 31, 2014 18:11:30 GMT
If you can tell me 100% that there's contact there then you either have awesome eyes or you're a liar!  That shows bugger all! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2014 18:31:53 GMT
Penalty Proves nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 31, 2014 18:34:54 GMT
It proves he missed the ball (by a mile) and impeded the player. Clear penalty, as was ours.
|
|
That shows bugger all!
