|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Aug 23, 2014 16:11:28 GMT
Got to be worth a 2yr contract for a Championship side. Gouranga.  |
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Aug 23, 2014 17:07:58 GMT
Yes I was wondering if had signed elsewhere.
Surely some clubs will be looking for a player of his experience
Good luck to him
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 23, 2014 17:12:04 GMT
A winger who relies on pace without pace isn't exactly sought after?
|
|
|
|
Post by robinreliant on Aug 23, 2014 17:19:10 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington !
|
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Aug 23, 2014 17:26:18 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington ! been sacked left.
Can well believe he would want Crouch & SJW but not Matty & certainly not at that amount per week. |
|
|
|
Post by robinreliant on Aug 23, 2014 17:31:08 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington ! been sacked left.
Can well believe he would want Crouch & SJW but not Matty & certainly not at that amount per week.He qualified his comments by stating that one of the three (Matty) was out of contract and hence a free signing and renumeration would be negotiable. To give Parrish his due, he probably thought TP had lost his marbles ! |
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Aug 23, 2014 17:53:01 GMT
Pulis' interest in our players seems to have leaked out this weekend but I have it on fairly good authority that it was Crouch, Walters and Wilson that he wanted and is what led to his resignation as his chairman wouldn't sanction the moves.
The only interest in any of our players has come in "unofficial" contact from Pulis without the backing of his club.
He nearly left in January when his chairman refused to sanction a move for Etherington.
|
|
|
|
Post by kettle2013 on Aug 23, 2014 18:04:58 GMT
Past it
|
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Aug 23, 2014 18:35:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by slpmarc on Aug 23, 2014 18:36:43 GMT
Matty is at west ham on trial to get a contract
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 23, 2014 18:38:23 GMT
Pulis' interest in our players seems to have leaked out this weekend but I have it on fairly good authority that it was Crouch, Walters and Wilson that he wanted and is what led to his resignation as his chairman wouldn't sanction the moves. The only interest in any of our players has come in "unofficial" contact from Pulis without the backing of his club. He nearly left in January when his chairman refused to sanction a move for Etherington. But Tone is a man with a solid moral compass Dave, I read so on here!  |
|
|
|
Post by Linx on Aug 23, 2014 19:06:23 GMT
People forget that Tone has form for falling out with every chairman he's worked with, with the exception of PC and the bloke at Plymouth (I think).
|
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Aug 23, 2014 19:18:20 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington ! This is not bizarre at all..........it sounds exactly like TP, tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Aug 23, 2014 19:44:05 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington ! This is not bizarre at all..........it sounds exactly like TP, tbh. There's no way they'd have had to pay 50k a week for Walters and etherington |
|
|
|
Post by stokefaninde on Aug 23, 2014 19:47:45 GMT
Matty could do some work for a Championship team.
|
|
|
|
Post by rodriguez on Aug 23, 2014 20:04:40 GMT
Matty could do some work for a Championship team. He's a decent electrician I heard. Ha. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 23, 2014 20:18:44 GMT
Bizarrely Adrian Durham on Talksport gave the view earlier that TP left Palarse because he wanted to bring 3 x £50K a week players in : Crouch, Walters and Etherington ! been sacked left.
Can well believe he would want Crouch & SJW but not Matty & certainly not at that amount per week.I very much doubt it is. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 20:21:54 GMT
If that was true, there are all the reasons you need - three of them in fact - for him to have been sacked left.
Can well believe he would want Crouch & SJW but not Matty & certainly not at that amount per week. I very much doubt it is. Dunno about that Flaps,Mark Bright was on earlier saying exactly the same and that he is still very close to Palace and mates with Parish. Some truth in it I reckon. |
|
|
|
Post by Miles Offside on Aug 23, 2014 20:26:49 GMT
Dunno about that Flaps,Mark Bright was on earlier saying exactly the same and that he is still very close to Palace and mates with Parish. Some truth in it I reckon. Sounds like there might well be some truth in it. Pulis isn't unusual for going back for players who've played for him before. Most managers do it, don't they? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 20:30:42 GMT
Dunno about that Flaps,Mark Bright was on earlier saying exactly the same and that he is still very close to Palace and mates with Parish. Some truth in it I reckon. Sounds like there might well be some truth in it. Pulis isn't unusual for going back for players who've played for him before. Most managers do it, don't they? I really don't think Bright would be spouting that kind of talk on national radio if there wasn't some sort of truth in it as he is still close to the club and chairman. You're right in the fact that most managers do raid old clubs for players,but on the flip side I can see why Parish wouldn't sanction deals for the players mentioned,due to age,quality and resale value. All reasons as to why he was sacked here. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 23, 2014 20:40:35 GMT
Dunno about that Flaps,Mark Bright was on earlier saying exactly the same and that he is still very close to Palace and mates with Parish. Some truth in it I reckon. So you think Walters and Ethers would want 50k, he may be close but that sounds a bit far fetched tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 20:53:24 GMT
Dunno about that Flaps,Mark Bright was on earlier saying exactly the same and that he is still very close to Palace and mates with Parish. Some truth in it I reckon. So you think Walters and Ethers would want 50k, he may be close but that sounds a bit far fetched tbh. I wouldn't go as far as to say that the figures quoted are bang on but as far as I can remember Bright didn't mention any figures when I heard him. It wouldn't surprise me though if Pulis did want the players mentioned and also I can see why Parish wouldn't have wanted to sanction deals for them as well. If there is some truth in it and these are the reasons for Pulis jacking then he is a mard arse prick for leaving his employers in the shit like he has. I should imagine that there would be more to it than we will probably ever know but he has got previous for this kind of mard arsery. |
|
|
|
Post by mccfred on Aug 23, 2014 20:55:10 GMT
Would make a decent sub/ veteran presence in any squad Championship or below. Im sure some League 2 side would find it a big time signing.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 23, 2014 20:59:49 GMT
So you think Walters and Ethers would want 50k, he may be close but that sounds a bit far fetched tbh. I wouldn't go as far as to say that the figures quoted are bang on but as far as I can remember Bright didn't mention any figures when I heard him. It wouldn't surprise me though if Pulis did want the players mentioned and also I can see why Parish wouldn't have wanted to sanction deals for them as well. If there is some truth in it and these are the reasons for Pulis jacking then he is a mard arse prick for leaving his employers in the shit like he has. I should imagine that there would be more to it than we will probably ever know but he has got previous for this kind of mard arsery. It wouldn't surprise me if he wanted them either, he's the manager he should be given a budget and left to get on with it (if thats the deal they had), if they are within it then the chairman should keep his mouth shut, I don't see how Pulis is in the wrong here, he wanted some players (if true), was told no, and said fair enough I can't/won't work under these conditions see ya later. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 21:16:06 GMT
I wouldn't go as far as to say that the figures quoted are bang on but as far as I can remember Bright didn't mention any figures when I heard him. It wouldn't surprise me though if Pulis did want the players mentioned and also I can see why Parish wouldn't have wanted to sanction deals for them as well. If there is some truth in it and these are the reasons for Pulis jacking then he is a mard arse prick for leaving his employers in the shit like he has. I should imagine that there would be more to it than we will probably ever know but he has got previous for this kind of mard arsery. It wouldn't surprise me if he wanted them either, he's the manager he should be given a budget and left to get on with it (if thats the deal they had), if they are within it then the chairman should keep his mouth shut, I don't see how Pulis is in the wrong here, he wanted some players (if true), was told no, and said fair enough I can't/won't work under these conditions see ya later. It is all a load of guess work really but if the chairman has a vision for his club and it involves signing players with resale value and not signing quick fix players that don't suit his criteria for the football clubs future then the manager just accepts this and gets on with it,surely? The first sign of something not going his way he has fucked off and left them in the shit two days before the season kicked off. Plenty of managers have to work within constraints in their clubs and it seems to me that Pulis has got all high and mighty which I suppose some might say he is entitled to after last seasons work there,but I can see why Parish has stood his ground over this issue,after all hes only doing what Peter Coates finally woke up to in the end. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 23, 2014 21:22:19 GMT
It wouldn't surprise me if he wanted them either, he's the manager he should be given a budget and left to get on with it (if thats the deal they had), if they are within it then the chairman should keep his mouth shut, I don't see how Pulis is in the wrong here, he wanted some players (if true), was told no, and said fair enough I can't/won't work under these conditions see ya later. It is all a load of guess work really but if the chairman has a vision for his club and it involves signing players with resale value and not signing quick fix players that don't suit his criteria for the football clubs future then the manager just accepts this and gets on with it,surely? The first sign of something not going his way he has fucked off and left them in the shit two days before the season kicked off. Plenty of managers have to work within constraints in their clubs and it seems to me that Pulis has got all high and mighty which I suppose some might say he is entitled to after last seasons work there,but I can see why Parish has stood his ground over this issue,after all hes only doing what Peter Coates finally woke up to in the end. Surely if they both had different visions for the club then Pulis walking away was right for both parties, personally I don't think it should affect any decision that it was so close to kick off, thats not the managers problem, or the chairman for that matter. |
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Aug 23, 2014 21:40:06 GMT
People forget that Tone has form for falling out with every chairman he's worked with, with the exception of PC and the bloke at Plymouth (I think). he may not have fallen out with PC ,however the appointment of cartwright speaks volumes and was probably the beginning of the end for pulis |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 21:47:12 GMT
It is all a load of guess work really but if the chairman has a vision for his club and it involves signing players with resale value and not signing quick fix players that don't suit his criteria for the football clubs future then the manager just accepts this and gets on with it,surely? The first sign of something not going his way he has fucked off and left them in the shit two days before the season kicked off. Plenty of managers have to work within constraints in their clubs and it seems to me that Pulis has got all high and mighty which I suppose some might say he is entitled to after last seasons work there,but I can see why Parish has stood his ground over this issue,after all hes only doing what Peter Coates finally woke up to in the end. Surely if they both had different visions for the club then Pulis walking away was right for both parties, personally I don't think it should affect any decision that it was so close to kick off, thats not the managers problem, or the chairman for that matter. Pulis didn't have a vision though,he isn't bothered about future planning,he is all about the here and now and it will prove his downfall in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 23, 2014 22:03:39 GMT
Surely if they both had different visions for the club then Pulis walking away was right for both parties, personally I don't think it should affect any decision that it was so close to kick off, thats not the managers problem, or the chairman for that matter. Pulis didn't have a vision though,he isn't bothered about future planning,he is all about the here and now and it will prove his downfall in my opinion. I wouldn't know what his vision was for Palace tbh, I haven't read anything about it, but as I've said before if he doesn't change he won't get many offers, but I doubt he cares, half decent career, money in the bank and probably a few goes at being a pundit, nothing for him to worry about really. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2014 22:18:25 GMT
Pulis didn't have a vision though,he isn't bothered about future planning,he is all about the here and now and it will prove his downfall in my opinion. I wouldn't know what his vision was for Palace tbh, I haven't read anything about it, but as I've said before if he doesn't change he won't get many offers, but I doubt he cares, half decent career, money in the bank and probably a few goes at being a pundit, nothing for him to worry about really. Can't really argue with that Flaps. I'm off to bed now,early start tomorrow,drinking commences at 7.15  |
|
