|
|
Post by brumstokie on Apr 19, 2014 17:17:38 GMT
Elbow on Larsson - must be a ban - or are the FA that corrupt?
|
|
|
|
Post by NassauDave on Apr 19, 2014 17:18:28 GMT
It fucking should be. Then again it's Chelsea....
|
|
|
|
Post by delilah7 on Apr 19, 2014 17:20:02 GMT
He's a nasty little shitehawk, if the FA don't do him for it they really are corrupt.
|
|
|
|
Post by coates on Apr 19, 2014 17:21:14 GMT
Thug
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Apr 19, 2014 17:21:51 GMT
He's a nasty little shitehawk, if the FA don't do him for it they really are corrupt. Even if they charge him,it wont take away that they are still corrupt. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Apr 19, 2014 17:22:16 GMT
Disgraceful challenge of course a retrospective ban won't have the same effect of them going down to 10 men
|
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Apr 19, 2014 17:28:22 GMT
The most horrible player of a very horrible bunch at a club who are the most horrible of a very horrible bunch of clubs in the most horrible league out of a very horrible bunch of leagues in the world.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Apr 19, 2014 17:29:47 GMT
He better get a ban. This is what's making the title really tough to call. Something I hate about all the top four.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2014 17:30:35 GMT
Had visitors, but just caught a clip of that. How did the ref not see it! I know. They're saying that he didn't see it on sky, but he was right near the incident from what I saw. He's always struck me as a big club bias ref!
|
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Apr 19, 2014 17:30:51 GMT
Retro ban? But right in front of ref! Ref must have seen it and decided it was nothing?
|
|
|
|
Post by unknown182 on Apr 19, 2014 17:31:33 GMT
You can see him turn and look for Larsson before he swings which makes it worse. No idea how the ref didn't see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by BigKahunaBurger on Apr 19, 2014 17:32:45 GMT
Surely. If the ref says he saw it he needs sacking. If he says that he didn't see it it has to be a ban.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Apr 19, 2014 17:33:23 GMT
I can only think the ref was trying to look around them at that moment as chelsea were striding into the Sunderland area and chose two were in his vision.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Apr 19, 2014 17:40:14 GMT
Surely. If the ref says he saw it he needs sacking. If he says that he didn't see it it has to be a ban. ....but Fellini only got a retrospective 3 match ban because the ref said he witnessed the punch and the elbow on Ryan. He only missed the head butt. No action taken against the ref? |
|
|
|
Post by Jimm on Apr 19, 2014 17:41:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by MadMarko10 on Apr 19, 2014 17:44:12 GMT
Both Ramires and Larsson should be banned.
Ramires for lashing out with intent and Larsson for making such a meal of it.
Embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokesaint1 on Apr 19, 2014 17:54:32 GMT
No doubt Jose will dismiss it as nothing and the ass lickers at the FA will agree. Be interesting to see what happens with this.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Apr 19, 2014 17:59:51 GMT
On a separate note, doesn't Larsson look like Brandon from Highways 'thru Hell?  |
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Apr 19, 2014 18:01:55 GMT
Larsson's reaction is comical. He was lifted off the deck by both feet it's fucking hilarious. On a more serious note though these retrospective bans do not give the advantage to the right club. Chelsea have Norwich and Cardiff to play in their last 3 games thus handing any advantage of a ban to Derlands relegation rivals.
|
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Apr 19, 2014 18:03:42 GMT
Larsson's reaction is comical. He was lifted off the deck by both feet it's fucking hilarious. They're all wankers aren't they. Christ I hate football sometimes. |
|
|
|
Post by coates on Apr 19, 2014 18:50:56 GMT
Larsson's reaction is comical. He was lifted off the deck by both feet it's fucking hilarious. They're all wankers aren't they. Christ I hate football sometimes. Love to see him take a haymaker and see his recation then. |
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Apr 19, 2014 18:53:05 GMT
Just seen this on the highlights - ref didn't see it - so should be a retrospective red
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2014 21:59:39 GMT
Adam Johnson got away with that high foot...much worse than what Johnny Walters went for at Norwich!
Great consistency as always
|
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Apr 20, 2014 7:22:00 GMT
Mourinho's public lambasting of the ref was probably to deflect attention from this incident. The FA will bottle it for this reason alone while they consider his outburst. Didn't watch MOTD, if it wasn't mentioned by the great and good on there then it won't happen. Certainly nothing on BBC Sport website.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemanusa on Apr 20, 2014 10:40:24 GMT
The first fucking thing im doing is watching Adam's twitter feed after the result from the FA. Should be good.  |
|
|
|
Post by nononsense on Apr 20, 2014 13:04:42 GMT
Elbow on Larsson - must be a ban - or are the FA that corrupt? Who ?? |
|
|
|
Post by bignickhowes on Apr 20, 2014 13:09:46 GMT
not sure who this ramaries is.. did you mean ramires?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2014 13:12:13 GMT
Was there not a thread or post on here a few weeks ago saying that any individual can bring incidents to the attention of the FA and they'd have to look into it.
Bent twats anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by brumstokie on Apr 20, 2014 14:45:17 GMT
not sure who this ramaries is.. did you mean ramires? Yes that's the guy! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2014 19:14:02 GMT
Anything happened to this Cnut?.
|
|
