|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 19, 2008 0:08:03 GMT
yeah.like i say,we should play a certain amount of games and then wait for everybody to catch up.
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Mar 19, 2008 0:08:22 GMT
good shout stokelad......
so basically you play say 20 games in a season, and you play them when you can.....and when everyone has eventually played all there games we look at the league standings then....
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 19, 2008 0:10:29 GMT
i think we should have fixtures ;D then play eachother when we can.
|
|
|
Post by stokelad on Mar 19, 2008 0:12:29 GMT
sounds good luke as iam only on the oatie at night, so others might have played in the day so this way makes it fair.
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Mar 19, 2008 0:12:59 GMT
i'm going to get no sleep tonight ;D but it is a good shout......but then again will that mean no more 4-way games ???
|
|
|
Post by SuperRickyFuller on Mar 19, 2008 0:14:39 GMT
Unless.. This method is a bit more complicated but could give: 1) People who want to play loads, to play loads 2) People who don't have as much time on their hands chance to compete for the title Basically, instead of a total points tally, you have an 'Average Points Per Game' tally. For example, I play 50 games, win a couple, lose a couple, I'll average about 3 points a game Someone else plays 10 games, win a couple, lose a couple, they'll average about the same but isn't penalised for having less time than others It could be a better way of working it out. Therefore, you don't have a limit on how many games you play! You play as much or as little as you can but have the same chance of finishing top as everybody else Downside is that it could be a bit more time consuming, but fairer
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Mar 19, 2008 0:15:05 GMT
yeah well people will be available at different times.....so having a set amount of games means you can play when available.....i'm not always available through the day, so you can play whenever your preference....
|
|
|
Post by SuperRickyFuller on Mar 19, 2008 0:18:25 GMT
That's the great thing about this average points system. You play as much as you want, whenever you can but don't get penalised for having less time than others Therefore, the league can continue for as long as it can
|
|
|
Post by stokelad on Mar 19, 2008 0:33:05 GMT
sounds good srf
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 19, 2008 0:34:36 GMT
yeah the average thing is good.but a player must play over 10 games lets say?
|
|
|
Post by SuperRickyFuller on Mar 19, 2008 0:36:57 GMT
Yep. I mentioned that in the other thread Play a minimum of games to be eligible to get an average. Just keep a note of where people have come in every game, like we would have to if we used anyother system, then as soon as someone hits 10 games, calculate the average for that person
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Mar 19, 2008 1:03:40 GMT
so basically i'll be updating peoples scores every ten games.....
|
|
|
Post by stokelad on Mar 20, 2008 0:02:45 GMT
game anyone?
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Mar 20, 2008 15:13:31 GMT
anyone for a game of pool?
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Mar 20, 2008 19:18:17 GMT
anyone for a game of pool?
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 20, 2008 19:32:45 GMT
yeah go on.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Mar 20, 2008 20:07:05 GMT
ok, ill be on in a minute
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Mar 20, 2008 20:08:51 GMT
Right, i'm on now ;D
|
|