|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 28, 2013 23:20:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Jan 28, 2013 23:21:10 GMT
Not sure at all about Mackie's quality but it would be beneficial I guess to get rid of Crouch. Its clearly not working.
|
|
|
|
Post by DentySCFC on Jan 28, 2013 23:21:16 GMT
Don't want either at the club, one's ill suited to us, the other is just wank and is another Walters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dannyboy on Jan 28, 2013 23:21:57 GMT
Mackie is awful just a dog chasing a bone for 90 minutes...tones wet dream!
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 28, 2013 23:22:21 GMT
Do it
Mackie would suit the system far more than Crouch ever has/will
|
|
|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Jan 28, 2013 23:23:09 GMT
Thanks for the name check - far more shocking than the story itself is the fact I got to it before you!! I guess it was not obscure enough - if we had been scouting an Israeli under-21 striker who played in the German third division, you'd have been nailed on!!  |
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Jan 28, 2013 23:23:25 GMT
1. We would get rid of Crouch's wage.
2. We would get rid of a player who doesn't really suit us.
3. We would get a player who does suit us.
4. We would get the perfect replacement for Walters.
Sign the papers?
EDIT: 4. If Walters needs a "rest", which is unlikely I know.
EDIT: 5. We could now keep Jones and bring in Bent?
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 28, 2013 23:23:56 GMT
Swap deals never happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 28, 2013 23:24:17 GMT
Thanks for the name check - far more shocking than the story itself is the fact I got to it before you!! I guess it was not obscure enough - if we had been scouting an Israeli under-21 striker who played in the German third division, you'd have been nailed on!! Haha. I'm not as fast as I used to be, Jez. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Jan 28, 2013 23:26:09 GMT
Thanks for the name check - far more shocking than the story itself is the fact I got to it before you!! I guess it was not obscure enough - if we had been scouting an Israeli under-21 striker who played in the German third division, you'd have been nailed on!! Haha. I'm not as fast as I used to be, Jez. Fullermagic it has to be said you are a bit of an expert at gathering info during the transfer window! Much appreciated. |
|
|
|
Post by Championship Potter on Jan 28, 2013 23:27:08 GMT
I'd rather take cash to be honest. We've already got a good collection of one-paced players with limited ability!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2013 23:27:41 GMT
Quite surprised 'Arry's so keen to get rid - muck and bullets, run all day types like Mackie are, if anything, just the kind he needs at the moment. It's the Bosingwas and Hoiletts that have got them into this mess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2013 23:27:44 GMT
Desperate men doing desperate things, our transfer policy hasn't and never has had a inkling of strategic thinking to it and in any business thats a disaster , stop it now Mr Chairman and think again over the next few games about the long term .
|
|
|
|
Post by crouchbot on Jan 28, 2013 23:29:40 GMT
Sounds like we are building a side for the Championship!
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 28, 2013 23:30:37 GMT
Sounds like we are building a side for the Championship! Behave |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 28, 2013 23:31:23 GMT
It does seem to say, before the story gets blurry, that Mackie isn't keen on moving up north
|
|
|
|
Post by Dannyboy on Jan 28, 2013 23:31:26 GMT
Sounds like we are building a side for the Championship! It does ;D gotta laugh or id cry! |
|
|
|
Post by alexk on Jan 28, 2013 23:31:46 GMT
These swaps never happen. They're both shite though, and it would mean we'd paid £10M for Jamie Mackie, which would be the most hilarious piece of transfer business in history.
|
|
|
|
Post by forwardpass on Jan 28, 2013 23:32:22 GMT
Both striker moves point to a reduction in wages. KJ and Crouch will be on way more than Mackie and Graham.
I wonder if we have overspent!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Jan 28, 2013 23:32:26 GMT
These swaps never happen. They're both shite though, and it would mean we'd paid £10M for Jamie Mackie, which would be the most hilarious piece of transfer business in history. That simply doesn't bear thinking about when you put it like that! |
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 28, 2013 23:33:02 GMT
These swaps never happen. They're both shite though, and it would mean we'd paid £10M for Jamie Mackie, which would be the most hilarious piece of transfer business in history. Just like the £18m for Crouch Or £8m for Palacois depending which way you look at it |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2013 23:34:32 GMT
Pulis would never sell or swap Peter Crouch ....and Arry The Backander wouldn't sign him. He knew when he sold him that it was the best £ 10 million transfer he'd ever pulled off....
|
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 28, 2013 23:38:15 GMT
1. We would get rid of Crouch's wage. 2. We would get rid of a player who doesn't really suit us. 3. We would get a player who does suit us. 4. We would get the perfect replacement for Walters. Sign the papers? EDIT: 4. If Walters needs a "rest", which is unlikely I know. Agree with TD the price of the deal is crazy. But add to your list we could keep KJ and bring in Bent |
|
|
|
Post by DC1863 on Jan 28, 2013 23:41:45 GMT
Mackies could be a decent player for us, wouldnt be a bad swap if QPR chucked in a few million for Crouch, doubt he'd even pull £5m currently though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Championship Potter on Jan 28, 2013 23:43:20 GMT
These swaps never happen. They're both shite though, and it would mean we'd paid £10M for Jamie Mackie, which would be the most hilarious piece of transfer business in history. Whatever way you look at it, we got royally fucked on the Crouch deal. If Mackie brings more to the table (which is debatable) then it's certainly worth considering. |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 29, 2013 0:14:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2013 0:20:37 GMT
It could be a good move for all party's, if we get money thrown in the deal as well. Admittedly I haven't seen to much of Mackie but it seems as if he a more Stoke type of player.
Crouch will be happy to work with Harry again
QPR will happy to get a good player if used correctly
Stoke will be happy....we offload the player who broke our system and get one who could become useful in our squad + money.
|
|
|
|
Post by NG4POTTERS on Jan 29, 2013 0:20:47 GMT
Crouch for zamora. Done deal  ;D Roots ITK. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 29, 2013 0:46:16 GMT
If it means we end up keeping Kenwyne does it matter who we swap Crouch for?
???
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Jan 29, 2013 0:53:11 GMT
These swaps never happen. They're both shite though, and it would mean we'd paid £10M for Jamie Mackie, which would be the most hilarious piece of transfer business in history. Just like the £18m for Crouch Or £8m for Palacois depending which way you look at it 18m for Jamie Mackie, what a player! Look where we've come from paying 18m for a player..... ;D |
|
