|
|
Post by musik on Feb 16, 2012 22:53:15 GMT
Begovic - 9 Wilkinson - 9 Huth - 7 Shawcross - 9 [MoM] Wilson - 8 Pennant - 7 Palacios - 7 Delap - 7 Etherington - 7 Walters - 7 Crouch - 8 Subs: Whitehead - 9 Shotton - 7 Jerome - 7  |
|
|
|
Post by baystokie on Feb 16, 2012 22:56:18 GMT
Begovic - 9 Wilkinson - 9 Huth - 7 Shawcross - 9 [MoM] Wilson - 8 Pennant - 7 Palacios - 7 Delap - 7 Etherington - 7 Walters - 7 Crouch - 8 Subs: Whitehead - 9 Shotton - 7 Jerome - 7 With those scores, we must have won - did I miss a late brace in time added on  |
|
|
|
Post by stokieinyork on Feb 16, 2012 23:05:41 GMT
Begovic - 7
Wilkinson - 8
Huth - 7
Shawcross - 6
Wilson - 6
Pennant - 7
Palacios - 5
Delap - 6
Etherington - 6
Walters - 6
Crouch - 6
Subs:
Whitehead - 7
Shotton - 7
Jerome - 8
For what its worth and some will disagree but thats why we love the footy!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by musik on Feb 16, 2012 23:14:09 GMT
Well, you could take minus one from each and every player in my first post if you like. I would to be positive though. The swedish commentator at C Sports/Canal Plus said Begovic and above all Whitehead were fantastic!! At the same time he said Stoke now are hopeless of going through and Valencia have been so much better today.
Oh well.
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnyscfc on Feb 16, 2012 23:19:43 GMT
Begovic - 7
Wilkinson - 8
Huth - 6
Shawcross - 7
Wilson - 6
Pennant - 7
Palacios - 5
Delap - 6
Etherington - 6
Walters - 5
Crouch - 5
Subs:
Whitehead - 6
Shotton - 6
Jerome - 7
|
|
|
|
Post by pittshillplotter on Feb 16, 2012 23:22:28 GMT
Begovic 8
Wilkinson 9
Huth 6
Shawcross 8
Wilson 7
Pennant 7
Palacios 4
Delap 6
Etherington 6
Walters 7
Crouch 5
|
|
|
|
Post by multiplescoregasms on Feb 16, 2012 23:24:04 GMT
Begovic 8
Wilkinson 9
Huth 7
Shawcross 6
Wilson 6
Pennant 7
Palacios 4
Delap 6
Etherington 5
Walters 7
Crouch 6
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2012 23:26:36 GMT
Begovic - 6
Wilko - 8
Shawcross - 7
Huth - 6
Wilson - 6
Pennant - 7
Delap - 7
Palacios - 4
Etherington - 5
Walters - 7
Crouch - 5
|
|
|
|
Post by markfitdt on Feb 16, 2012 23:26:43 GMT
Begovic 5
Wilkinson 9
Huth 7
Shawcross 7
Wilson 6
Pennant 7
Palacios 5
Delap 5
Etherington 5
Walters 7
Crouch 6
Whitehead 7
Shotton 6
Jerome 7.5
|
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Feb 16, 2012 23:35:07 GMT
Begovic 5 Wilkinson 9 Huth 7 Shawcross 7 Wilson 6 Pennant 7 Palacios 5 Delap 5 Etherington 5 Walters 7 Crouch 6 Whitehead 7 Shotton 6 Jerome 7.5 Begovic 5? Kept us in the game with the save in the first half and had absolutely no chance with the goal. |
|
|
|
Post by markfitdt on Feb 16, 2012 23:38:22 GMT
Begovic 5 Wilkinson 9 Huth 7 Shawcross 7 Wilson 6 Pennant 7 Palacios 5 Delap 5 Etherington 5 Walters 7 Crouch 6 Whitehead 7 Shotton 6 Jerome 7.5 Begovic 5? Kept us in the game with the save in the first half and had absolutely no chance with the goal. I dont blame him for the goal at all - wonder strike but I thought he looked very nervous. There were countless times defenders were shielding the ball for him to come and get it and he just stayed on his line. I wasnt the only one around me who noticed it either. Maybe it should be a 6 not a 5 but after he dropped the ball early in the game he looked shaky to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Feb 16, 2012 23:40:12 GMT
Begovic - 6 (Made one good save, no chance with the goal, dropped a cross, little else do, average)
Wilkinson - 7 (Fully committed performance, poor distribution with the ball)
Huth - 7 (Steady game, nothing spectacular)
Shawcross - 7 (See above)
Wilson - 6 (Still does his fake with his left foot onto his right but not as much today, shame it was in our box when he did it, anyone does a scouting report on him & we're in deep s**t)
Pennant - 7 (Gave it a go, made an excellent tackle tracking back, poor corners/free kicks)
Palacios - 4 (Could have done with it been windy, he might have moved more & got closer to their players)
Delap - 5 (one good throw in, offered little else)
Etherington - 5 (just ran with no idea where he was going or how he was going to get there, lost his temper, got a stupid booking)
Walters - 6 (Ran his legs off, shot dragged wide early on but little else)
Crouch - 6 (One spectacular effort just past the post, little else)
Subs:
Whitehead - 7 (Gave the midfield more energy)
Shotton - 6 (Had an effort kinda of on goal via a massive deflection)
Jerome - 7 (Ran his legs off again)
Summary, we just didn't have enough about us to cause them any problems, we're too predictable & we badly lack someone who can cut a defence open with a pass. Having said that they didn't really cause us many problems, we were comfortable but we needed to give it more of a go today.
|
|
|
|
Post by mark71 on Feb 17, 2012 4:49:29 GMT
Begovic - 5 looked very shakey.
Wilko - 7 played well.
Shawcross - 8.5 Captain fantastic.
Huth - 6 poor distribution
Wilson - 6 not at his best
Pennant - 7 good game, crosses could of been better
Delap - 4 woeful, should be no where near the team.
Palacios - 5 faided badly, how did he ever pass a medical?
Etherington - 6 not involved enough.
Walters - 4 Jonny head down is just that. perhaps should call him forrest gump
Crouch - 6 not playing to his strengths.
whitehead-7 played well when he came on.
Jerome- 6 no service to do anything.
Shotts- 6 had a throw in, thats about that.
|
|
Stokie-Leek
Academy Starlet
Be Loyal, Be Proud, Be Stoke
Posts: 109
|
Post by Stokie-Leek on Feb 17, 2012 7:43:07 GMT
Begovic 5
Wilkinson 9
Huth 6
Shawcross 7
Wilson 6
Pennant 6
Palacios 5
Delap 5
Etherington 6
Walters 7
Crouch 6
Whitehead 8
Shotton 5
Jerome 6
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc1234 on Feb 17, 2012 9:21:29 GMT
Our midfield is truly woeful, no matter the combination. A few people seem to have marked Palacios down probably due tohigh expectations more than anything else. Yes, he was poor, but any midfielder would be with Delap in tandem.To say we need two new central midfielders as soon as possible is something of an understatement.
|
|
|
|
Post by ladyinred on Feb 17, 2012 9:22:39 GMT
How anybody can give Huth a higher mark than Shawcross in that match, I do not know.
IMO Shawcross was immense 1st half - saved Huth on a couple of occasions. Talking to Wilko was fantastic.
But football is a game of opinions.
|
|
|
|
Post by superjonnywalters on Feb 17, 2012 9:28:10 GMT
I must have been watching a different game as I thought Wilson was the better of the 2 full backs. The problem with Wilko is, he'll have 5 or 6 great moments where he sprints 50 yards and wins a ball that he has no right to win. The whole crowd then rise to their feet and sing his name. But there's another dozen times where he just kicks it straight to the opposition under no pressure.
Begovic - 7 Couldn't do anything about the goal, one great save
Huth - 7.5 Pretty steady, couple of great interceptions/tackles in the box
Shawcross - 7 Again, pretty steady. Won most of the stuff in the air
Wilson - 8 Composed on the ball, great defensively. Can't ask for much more than that
Pennant 7.5 - Worked his socks off, offered great width, some decent balls in. Could have done better with others.
Delap - 6 Poor distribution yet again. Improved slightly second half and won a few corners
Palacios - 6 Really not convinced with him. 6 months and still doesn't look an £8m player
Ethers - 6 Low confidence, poor performance. Long standing problem. Poor delivery.
Crouch - 7 Not a great deal of service, did ok.
Walters - 7.5 Worked his socks off and won some set pieces which we didn't make the most of.
Wilko - 7 Some great stuff, some very poor stuff
|
|
|
|
Post by anarchicalan on Feb 17, 2012 9:38:29 GMT
Begovic - 6 (looked shaky at times, no chance with the goal though)
Wilkinson - 9 (MOM and best game in ages from Andy)
Huth - 7 (booked for nowt in my opinion)
Shawcross - 7 (didn't win enough in the air and looked lost at times)
Wilson - 6 (injured and it showed)
Pennant - 8 (had a good game, about time he was back in the side)
Palacios - 4 (bloody woeful)
Delap - 8 (played well, especially in his defensive role)
Etherington - 5 (poor once again)
Walters - 5 (time to rest him)
Crouch - 7 (didn't win enough in the air, but the service wasn't there from the wings)
Subs:
Whitehead - 8 (did well when he came on, still gave too many balls away though)
Shotton - 6 (not really given a chance to get into the game)
Jerome - 8 (we look so much better when he's playing)
|
|
|
|
Post by jaybee on Feb 17, 2012 12:56:34 GMT
Bego - 6 - a couple of fumbles which is worrying Wilko - 9 - steady 1st half, immense 2nd Ryan - 8 - good display Huuuth - 7 - not up to his usual best Wilson - 7 - some good, some bad JP - 8 - couple of poor set pieces, but otherwise good WP - 6 - hmm, not sure Rory - 6 - good throws  Ethers - 7 - faded in and out JW - 7 - shoulda been on target in the 1st minute Crouchy - 7 - shame the ref had decided before the game that he was 'dirty' Deano - 7 - added some sparkle CJ - 6 - didn't do much Shotts - 6 - skinned with his first 'touch' but ok after |
|
|
|
Post by jaybee on Feb 17, 2012 13:03:42 GMT
Huth - 7 (booked for nowt in my opinion) He wasn't booked at all ... in my opinion  |
|
|
|
Post by nutterpotter on Feb 17, 2012 13:04:07 GMT
Begovic- 6- One good save. Everything else about average.
Wilkinson-9- Great display. Tough tackling.
Shawcross-9- Great display. Remember him helping out Huth a few times.
Huth-8- Good performance.
Wilson- 7- Good, but guy who he was supposed to be marking got away from him a few times.
Pennant-7- Thought he had an alright game. Quality of delivery from set pieces varied.
Palacios-5- Poor performance. One great bit of skill but he couldn't keep up with the pace of the game.
Delap-6- Don't know what to say.
Etherington-6.5-Not very sure what to do with the ball.
Crouch- 7- Needs to stop holding the defender when jumping up to head the ball.
Walters- 7- Worked 'aaaarrrdddddd.
|
|
|
|
Post by eriksson74 on Feb 17, 2012 13:09:02 GMT
How anybody can give Huth a higher mark than Shawcross in that match, I do not know. IMO Shawcross was immense 1st half - saved Huth on a couple of occasions. Talking to Wilko was fantastic. But football is a game of opinions. You forget the 3 excellent interceptions inside the 6 yard box, which I think prevented certain goals (2 first half and one just after half time) |
|
|
|
Post by superjonnywalters on Feb 17, 2012 13:12:31 GMT
How anybody can give Huth a higher mark than Shawcross in that match, I do not know. IMO Shawcross was immense 1st half - saved Huth on a couple of occasions. Talking to Wilko was fantastic. But football is a game of opinions. You forget the 3 excellent interceptions inside the 6 yard box, which I think prevented certain goals (2 first half and one just after half time) Spot on Eriksson. Some vital interceptions. |
|
